Hmmmm more injuries

[Westsider]

And a lot of hamstring/driver/calf injuries later in the season.... related to bike riding maybe?

[Hondo]

OK I think we all know no one is going to be injury free, I should have put "relatively" injury free

Correct me if Im wrong but Adelaides always seems to be longer than others...again correct me if Im wrong

This is the best I could come up with quickly, this is as at 12 Aug 2008

http://www.injuryupdate.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=6664

Interestingly, NM had a higher injury list than the Crows It shows Adelaide were at the lower end & WC/Freo/Ess were simply a disaster. It's just a snap shot I know, but if your theory had legs then the Crows would be clear leaders? It also shows that injury affects ALL clubs. No club ever has a "relatively" injury free year however if Essendon are the bench mark, the the Crows were actually low by their standards

In fact, the Elim final team wasn't missing many players other than the impact injuries like Porps and the Birdman. According to your theory, we should be struggling to find 22 players by September.

Dutchy, IMO there is nothing in your Adelaide injury theory. I think you think it's worse than it is because you are looking for it, to justify your pre-judgement.

We can track it more closely this year and see what's what in 2009.

[Dutchy]

One difference between the Crows and the Roos....

We play on the DOOM 15 times a year

[Psyber]

One difference between the Crows and the Roos....
We play on the DOOM 15 times a year

Perhaps it is time to relocate..
Sydney perhaps?

[Westsider]

One difference between the Crows and the Roos....
We play on the DOOM 15 times a year

Perhaps it is time to relocate..
Sydney perhaps?

Tassy