Better opposite foot: Pendlez or Danger?

Talk on the national game

Who has a better opposite foot?

Poll ended at Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:46 pm

Scott Pendlebury
30
71%
Patrick Dangerfield
12
29%
 
Total votes : 42

Re: Better opposite foot: Pendlez or Danger?

Postby nuggety goodness » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:17 pm

Johno6 wrote:
Sorry Dude wrote:Considering how many left footers can actually kick on their opposite foot, I would say Pendlebury is by far the best.

In regards to general field play, Pendlebury is naturally better than Dangerfield, but like it has been shown Dangerfield can do the impossible.

But, Sam Mitchell smokes both of them in this area, and is probably a better left foot kick than Pendlebury is ;)



Agree of Sam Mitchell being the best on both sides


Yep Mitchell is probably the best.. Other than him I've seen a few go ok. Hurley and Sidebottom are two I can think of
I am not talking to you for 3 minutes because you punched me in the head and it hurt and that was not okay for you to do
User avatar
nuggety goodness
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:52 pm
Has liked: 329 times
Been liked: 219 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: Better opposite foot: Pendlez or Danger?

Postby Sorry Dude » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:25 pm

Can probably add Heath Scotland to this list.
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:06 am
Has liked: 156 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Better opposite foot: Pendlez or Danger?

Postby The Dark Knight » Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:37 pm

Sorry Dude wrote:Can probably add Heath Scotland to this list.

Second best opposite foot kick in the AFL behind Sam Mitchell who is naturally left footed.
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
 
Posts: 35538
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:32 pm
Location: Gotham City
Has liked: 11670 times
Been liked: 1652 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Better opposite foot: Pendlez or Danger?

Postby Dogmatic » Tue Jul 23, 2013 8:05 pm

Dangerfield has the pace and strength to get onto his right.
Mitchell is slower therefore doesn't have the same time to dispose by foot as Dangerfield or Pendelbury to a lesser extent.
For every one I miss I am closer to a hole in one.
Dogmatic
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2055
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 8:26 pm
Location: 19th hole
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 32 times
Grassroots Team: Brahma Lodge

Re: Better opposite foot: Pendlez or Danger?

Postby NO-MERCY » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:20 am

Sorry Dude wrote:Can probably add Heath Scotland to this list.


I think i read Pendlez or Danger........mmmmm :roll: :roll:

Yes its Pendlez by a country mile. :lol:
NO-MERCY
Coach
 
Posts: 5336
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:21 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Better opposite foot: Pendlez or Danger?

Postby Booney » Wed Jul 24, 2013 9:45 am

Not many negatives to Dangerfields game, but I think his disposal can be suspect. Typically it's poor when he is going flat out at a clearance, but who can blame him at the pace he moves. If he can improve his efficiency by only a small amount it will help Adelaide immensly. His left footer against Brisbane was a ripper, but overall I think Pendelbury is the better user of the ball on both sides. Pendelbury does play more outside than inside though so he does have a little extra time.

One of my favourites to watch is Pendelbury, so smooth and seems to have so much time when in a tight space. Dangerfield is just crash and bash and shin it forward at all costs.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61119
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8080 times
Been liked: 11778 times

Re: Better opposite foot: Pendlez or Danger?

Postby footybitch » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:43 pm

What a difficult choice - Pendlebury is a fantastic player - but Danger is a tad more penetrating with his kicks.
footybitch
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 10:22 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Better opposite foot: Pendlez or Danger?

Postby cokadonkeytoo » Mon Jul 29, 2013 7:05 pm

james07 wrote:pendleburys opposite foot is better then both of clangerfields feet put together


You're a clown James07, you must go to the same football opinion school as days.

Rubbish post

I suppose you think John Butcher kicks better than danger aswell
Get that corn outta my face!!
User avatar
cokadonkeytoo
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 44 times
Grassroots Team: Para Hills

Re: Better opposite foot: Pendlez or Danger?

Postby Bob Loblaw » Mon Jul 29, 2013 7:08 pm

cokadonkeytoo wrote:
james07 wrote:pendleburys opposite foot is better then both of clangerfields feet put together


You're a clown James07, you must go to the same football opinion school as days.

Rubbish post

Well have you tried kicking with both feet put together???
Bob Loblaw
Under 18s
 
Posts: 627
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:32 pm
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 8 times

Previous

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |