by overloaded » Tue Jun 21, 2011 1:38 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Pseudo » Tue Jun 21, 2011 5:09 pm
overloaded wrote:This Sunday night on CI. Anyone going to watch it?
Can someone brief me on the case?
by overloaded » Tue Jun 21, 2011 5:17 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by JAS » Tue Jun 21, 2011 6:17 pm
Pseudo wrote:overloaded wrote:This Sunday night on CI. Anyone going to watch it?
Can someone brief me on the case?
You've seriously never heard about that case?![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger
Don't reckon I'll watch it. I suspect that even my usually stoic demeanour would be upset by it.
by woodublieve12 » Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:28 pm
by BIG SEXY » Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:24 pm
by bayman » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:26 pm
by bayman » Sat Jun 25, 2011 8:52 am
by JK » Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:31 am
by JAS » Sat Jun 25, 2011 5:41 pm
JK wrote:I had to stop reading that one Jac, that's abominable .. It's not my place to say I guess, but whether it's via legal means or otherwise, those perpetrators I believe, should have their license to exist revoked.
by woodublieve12 » Sat Jun 25, 2011 6:34 pm
BIG SEXY wrote:thats incorrect wood, it was a fabricated story.
the 2 offenders were released, given new identeties and ordered to stay within the UK so they could be monitored by UK authorities.
another report 12 months or so ago was that one of them had been caught with kiddy porn, not sure how correct that is.
yet another report was the other was married with a child.
i was appaled as anyone when this happened, however how many of us can say weve never made a mistake in our youth, oktheirs was a cock up of monumental proportions and it did take a child away from his parents however they were young and i believe in rehabilitation. if they show they are remorseful and realise what they did was a heinous why not release them after their sentence is served.
rant end.......now
by BIG SEXY » Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:05 am
woodublieve12 wrote:BIG SEXY wrote:thats incorrect wood, it was a fabricated story.
the 2 offenders were released, given new identeties and ordered to stay within the UK so they could be monitored by UK authorities.
another report 12 months or so ago was that one of them had been caught with kiddy porn, not sure how correct that is.
yet another report was the other was married with a child.
i was appaled as anyone when this happened, however how many of us can say weve never made a mistake in our youth, oktheirs was a cock up of monumental proportions and it did take a child away from his parents however they were young and i believe in rehabilitation. if they show they are remorseful and realise what they did was a heinous why not release them after their sentence is served.
rant end.......now
they should never see the light of day again!!!! yeah ive made mistakes, none which result of bashing a 3 year old, which includes sodamising (cant spell, theres a mistake!!) with bottles, then ended on train tracks... this wasnt a mistake, this was premeditated. evil children!!!! if they got away with that, they would kill again and continue to do so until caught!!! i personally feel its a disgrace they got hidden identities. but thats just my opinion.
by overloaded » Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:33 am
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by BIG SEXY » Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:45 pm
by JAS » Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:30 pm
BIG SEXY wrote:its not secretive what they did. its secretive where they are now. with the world full of people who would take it upon themselves to exact revenge on them i think its probably a good idea to supress where they are and what theyre doing now
Anti-paedophile campaign (2000)
The paper began a controversial campaign to name and shame alleged paedophiles in 2000 following the abduction and murder of Sarah Payne. The paper's decision led to angry mobs terrorising those they suspected of being child sex offenders,[8] which included several cases of mistaken identity, including one instance where a paediatrician had her house vandalised[9] and another where a man was confronted because he had a neck brace similar to one a paedophile was wearing when pictured.[10][11] The campaign was labelled "grossly irresponsible" journalism by the then Chief Constable of Gloucestershire, Tony Butler.[12] The paper also campaigns for the introduction of 'Sarah's Law' to allow public access to the Sex Offenders Register.
by gadj1976 » Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:32 pm
overloaded wrote:I didnt really get into the production last night. It was all baout the mum.
Why is it so seceretive what those scumbags did to James?
by BIG SEXY » Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:59 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |