footy1992 wrote:OnSong wrote:Tom is wrong.
Russell clearly plays the better game and just because the jury have some sour grapes about getting sucked into his game and being beaten by him, he doesn't win.
The jury vote should count for the second prize, the top prize needs to be decided some other way, because this is twice the show has delivered a DISGRACEFUL verdict.
Correct me if wrong.
OUTWIT, OUTLAST, OUTPLAY
is the motto of the show,
Clearly russel did. Clearly russel should win.
End of story
Russell's very good at the first two. Not so good at the last. There is a strong social aspect which will mean Russell could play another 10 series and he'd never win.