SA Footy

South Adelaide v Adelaide | Flinders University Stadium | Saturday June 24th 2:10pm

SANFL Now | AFL Live App & AFL.com.au | Live radio on 1629 SEN SA & SEN App

SOUTH

League

F: Fitt, Shillabeer, Freitag

HF: Kirkland, Heaslip, Wilkinson

C: Mutch, O’Neill, Sampson

HB: Dunkin, Haines, Ramsay

B: S. Skinner, Summerton, Clavarino

R: Brooksby, Davis, Gibbs

INT: Mitton, Broadbent, Rogers, Megins, Birt, Hayes, Schuback

IN: Gibbs, Mitton, Birt, Megins, Schuback

OUT: Cockshell, Nye

ADELAIDE

Reserves

F: Smithson, Madgen, Himmelberg

HF: McAdam, Dowling, Boyle

C: Hately, Crouch, Nankervis

HB: Bond, Keane, Newchurch

B: Parnell, Borlase, Hamill

R: Strachan, Berry, Brown

INT: Haysman, Wright, O’Loughlin, Sharrad

IN: O’Loughlin, Sharrad, Smithson

OUT: Cook (AFL), Schoenberg (AFL), Gollant (AFL)

souf will throw everything at the crows reserves but it wont be enough, crows in a close one by 10pts

Difficult to see a South win eventuating, as is the crowd figure reaching 4 digits.

Gibbs back big difference.

Getting Adelaide the right side of their league game a bonus.

Free piss before the game. Gold

South by a point

I sense another article in the coming days bemoaning the hurtful comments from the opposition supporters… ;-)

South are woeful

Utter rubbish!!!!

The afl reserves so good for our competition, they create so much interest.

South - 22 inside 50’s, good lord…

How long before Gibbsy take over this season?

South are pathetic.
Wright is out of ideas and needs to go.
We can't score to save ourselves.
President nowhere to be seen, where is the leadership?

Yuck, game was over after 20 minutes. Broke even from there on, but the final scoreboard was flattering. Struggled to string together a cohesive passage of play all afternoon. The second term with the strong wind was almost as poor as the first, repeatedly handing the ball back to the opposition at half forward.

In South's defense it's a pretty good Crows side.

Yes a weak insipid performance, no question.
Half of the team by their actions yesterday dont give a toss, and there are a few big names amongst them.

However, as mentioned the crows had a very good side in- Gollant, Cook and schoenberg all played, and played very well.
South were down 3 rotations by half time- 2 concussions and an ankle;2 other players were also carrying injuries- 5 mins into the last qtr lost another with a broken collarbone.

A previous comment mentioned that the coach has to go....
the coach does'nt miss tackles, turn the ball over,put their hands on their hips like a tea pot and fail to chase, kick the ball out of bounds from a set shot from 25 m.; try to outmark from behind, and basically fail to provide a contest.
Also..
I fail to see how the attendance of the clubs president at matches will improve the clubs onfield performance....

"A previous comment mentioned that the coach has to go....
the coach does'nt miss tackles, turn the ball over,put their hands on their hips like a tea pot and fail to chase, kick the ball out of bounds from a set shot from 25 m.; try to outmark from behind, and basically fail to provide a contest."

Correct me if I'm wrong but...........doesn't the coach COACH them not to do those things?

gazzamagoo wrote:"A previous comment mentioned that the coach has to go....
the coach does'nt miss tackles, turn the ball over,put their hands on their hips like a tea pot and fail to chase, kick the ball out of bounds from a set shot from 25 m.; try to outmark from behind, and basically fail to provide a contest."

Correct me if I'm wrong but...........doesn't the coach COACH them not to do those things?

The coach takes the credit when winning, surely the coach must also take the blame when losing.

gazzamagoo wrote:"A previous comment mentioned that the coach has to go....
the coach does'nt miss tackles, turn the ball over,put their hands on their hips like a tea pot and fail to chase, kick the ball out of bounds from a set shot from 25 m.; try to outmark from behind, and basically fail to provide a contest."

Correct me if I'm wrong but...........doesn't the coach COACH them not to do those things?

cant coach effort though..

blueandwhite wrote:

gazzamagoo wrote:"A previous comment mentioned that the coach has to go....
the coach does'nt miss tackles, turn the ball over,put their hands on their hips like a tea pot and fail to chase, kick the ball out of bounds from a set shot from 25 m.; try to outmark from behind, and basically fail to provide a contest."

Correct me if I'm wrong but...........doesn't the coach COACH them not to do those things?

cant coach effort though..

If they're not making an effort then they should quit, or be sacked
someone else will make an effort.

blueandwhite wrote:Yes a weak insipid performance, no question.
Half of the team by their actions yesterday dont give a toss, and there are a few big names amongst them.

However, as mentioned the crows had a very good side in- Gollant, Cook and schoenberg all played, and played very well.
South were down 3 rotations by half time- 2 concussions and an ankle;2 other players were also carrying injuries- 5 mins into the last qtr lost another with a broken collarbone.

A previous comment mentioned that the coach has to go....
the coach does'nt miss tackles, turn the ball over,put their hands on their hips like a tea pot and fail to chase, kick the ball out of bounds from a set shot from 25 m.; try to outmark from behind, and basically fail to provide a contest.
Also..
I fail to see how the attendance of the clubs president at matches will improve the clubs onfield performance....

Coach is in his 6th year and we have gone backwards at an alarming rate. We can't score at all. 6 years is plenty of time to establish a winning game plan this isn't happening so time for a change. President being at games won't effect on field at all however it might show she cares. Does she actually go to the games?

Panther Pack wrote:

blueandwhite wrote:Yes a weak insipid performance, no question.
Half of the team by their actions yesterday dont give a toss, and there are a few big names amongst them.

However, as mentioned the crows had a very good side in- Gollant, Cook and schoenberg all played, and played very well.
South were down 3 rotations by half time- 2 concussions and an ankle;2 other players were also carrying injuries- 5 mins into the last qtr lost another with a broken collarbone.

A previous comment mentioned that the coach has to go....
the coach does'nt miss tackles, turn the ball over,put their hands on their hips like a tea pot and fail to chase, kick the ball out of bounds from a set shot from 25 m.; try to outmark from behind, and basically fail to provide a contest.
Also..
I fail to see how the attendance of the clubs president at matches will improve the clubs onfield performance....

Coach is in his 6th year and we have gone backwards at an alarming rate. We can't score at all. 6 years is plenty of time to establish a winning game plan this isn't happening so time for a change. President being at games won't effect on field at all however it might show she cares. Does she actually go to the games?

your first point, re the coach
-Jarrad Wright is contracted for next year. Id be very sure that South - like most other SANFL clubs atm, dont have the financial resources to pay a coach out of his contract.
Your second point,re the President.
short answer is Yes.