by Hopeful Jelly » Sat Dec 05, 2020 3:26 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Dec 05, 2020 3:27 pm
Yes, a very creative way of getting around the rules. Hopefully that loophole will be closed for the 2022 seasonHopeful Jelly wrote:Cam Sutcliffe has been confirmed as the Power reserves marquee player with the very real possibility that Port will also rookie list Tyson Goldsack so he can provide on-field leadership to its young players in the SANFL.
by Brett » Sat Dec 05, 2020 6:02 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Dec 05, 2020 6:03 pm
Yep. Definitely has to go.Brett wrote:I dont see the need for a Marquee player , its a load of crock IMO
by Dutchy » Sat Dec 05, 2020 6:21 pm
Hopeful Jelly wrote:Cam Sutcliffe has been confirmed as the Power reserves marquee player with the very real possibility that Port will also rookie list Tyson Goldsack so he can provide on-field leadership to its young players in the SANFL.
by Brett » Sat Dec 05, 2020 6:42 pm
by amber_fluid » Sat Dec 05, 2020 6:49 pm
Dutchy wrote:Hopeful Jelly wrote:Cam Sutcliffe has been confirmed as the Power reserves marquee player with the very real possibility that Port will also rookie list Tyson Goldsack so he can provide on-field leadership to its young players in the SANFL.
Isnt there a rule that a Marque player cant have played AFL in past 2 seasons?
by Spargo » Sat Dec 05, 2020 7:01 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Dutchy wrote:Hopeful Jelly wrote:Cam Sutcliffe has been confirmed as the Power reserves marquee player with the very real possibility that Port will also rookie list Tyson Goldsack so he can provide on-field leadership to its young players in the SANFL.
Isnt there a rule that a Marque player cant have played AFL in past 2 seasons?
They just mentioned on Ch 7 that Goldsack has nominated for the AFL draft so the Magpies can pick him as a marquee player if he’s not picked up.
Another loophole
by amber_fluid » Sat Dec 05, 2020 7:10 pm
Spargo wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Dutchy wrote:Hopeful Jelly wrote:Cam Sutcliffe has been confirmed as the Power reserves marquee player with the very real possibility that Port will also rookie list Tyson Goldsack so he can provide on-field leadership to its young players in the SANFL.
Isnt there a rule that a Marque player cant have played AFL in past 2 seasons?
They just mentioned on Ch 7 that Goldsack has nominated for the AFL draft so the Magpies can pick him as a marquee player if he’s not picked up.
Another loophole
Umm, 2 marque players?
by amber_fluid » Sat Dec 05, 2020 7:17 pm
Spargo wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Dutchy wrote:Hopeful Jelly wrote:Cam Sutcliffe has been confirmed as the Power reserves marquee player with the very real possibility that Port will also rookie list Tyson Goldsack so he can provide on-field leadership to its young players in the SANFL.
Isnt there a rule that a Marque player cant have played AFL in past 2 seasons?
They just mentioned on Ch 7 that Goldsack has nominated for the AFL draft so the Magpies can pick him as a marquee player if he’s not picked up.
Another loophole
Umm, 2 marquee players?
by Dogs64 » Sat Dec 05, 2020 7:38 pm
by Brett » Sat Dec 05, 2020 8:00 pm
by Brett » Sat Dec 05, 2020 8:03 pm
Dogs64 wrote:So they complain about list size reductions then pull this crap. Again, SANFL are spineless.
by bertiebeatle » Sat Dec 05, 2020 8:27 pm
by stan » Sat Dec 05, 2020 8:30 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Spargo wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Dutchy wrote:[quote="Hopeful Jelly"]Cam Sutcliffe has been confirmed as the Power reserves marquee player with the very real possibility that Port will also rookie list Tyson Goldsack so he can provide on-field leadership to its young players in the SANFL.
Isnt there a rule that a Marque player cant have played AFL in past 2 seasons?
They just mentioned on Ch 7 that Goldsack has nominated for the AFL draft so the Magpies can pick him as a marquee player if he’s not picked up.
Another loophole
Umm, 2 marquee players?
by DOC » Sat Dec 05, 2020 8:43 pm
bertiebeatle wrote::lol: oh man, I thought this thread would produce the goods tonight and it has.
You blokes live a miserable life
Nothing wrong with what Port is doing, its taking up a list spot that would have been taken by another SANFL player anyway but you guys are too thick to realise that.
by Spargo » Sat Dec 05, 2020 9:06 pm
DOC wrote:bertiebeatle wrote::lol: oh man, I thought this thread would produce the goods tonight and it has.
You blokes live a miserable life
Nothing wrong with what Port is doing, its taking up a list spot that would have been taken by another SANFL player anyway but you guys are too thick to realise that.
Why would the "list spot" be taken by a SANFL player?
by amber_fluid » Sat Dec 05, 2020 9:12 pm
bertiebeatle wrote::lol: oh man, I thought this thread would produce the goods tonight and it has.
You blokes live a miserable life
Nothing wrong with what Port is doing, its taking up a list spot that would have been taken by another SANFL player anyway but you guys are too thick to realise that.
by Reddeer » Sat Dec 05, 2020 10:01 pm
Dogs64 wrote:So they complain about list size reductions then pull this crap. Again, SANFL are spineless.
by bertiebeatle » Sat Dec 05, 2020 10:16 pm
amber_fluid wrote:bertiebeatle wrote::lol: oh man, I thought this thread would produce the goods tonight and it has.
You blokes live a miserable life
Nothing wrong with what Port is doing, its taking up a list spot that would have been taken by another SANFL player anyway but you guys are too thick to realise that.
You can’t rookie list players from other states?
Umm ok!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |