R21 - WWT Eagles v Glenelg @ Woody

[Mickyj]

I think you are missing the point Mickyj. The tribunal inconsistency is the gripe here mate.. Sadly I think you don't get that. You're making it too personal when it isn't the case..

Lets just move onto the Parade this week and stitch up top spot that will leave us 1 win from a grand final

Ok I just see the complaining about Boyd but I'll do what you say

[Itchy Tiger]

Get over yourself Micky. Good work Human Torpedo, the voice of reason!

[Mickyj]

I give up

[Big Phil]

Was the bump shown in the highlights the actual incident Woodall was suspended for?

I don't know, just assumed that it was due to it being shown in the package, in relation to Boyd's injury...

Could have been for a separate incident altogether?

[Eagles2014]

Was the bump shown in the highlights the actual incident Woodall was suspended for?

I don't know, just assumed that it was due to it being shown in the package, in relation to Boyd's injury...

Could have been for a separate incident altogether?

Was not the incident everyone is talking about, happened after that. Video footage was not great. Was ordinary what Woodall did. He deserved four matches. Lokan to use same tactics tomorrow against Sturt, Bays players won't be able to sneeze and they will be penalised!

[Spargo]

Was the bump shown in the highlights the actual incident Woodall was suspended for?

I don't know, just assumed that it was due to it being shown in the package, in relation to Boyd's injury...

Could have been for a separate incident altogether?

Was not the incident everyone is talking about, happened after that. Video footage was not great. Was ordinary what Woodall did. He deserved four matches. Lokan to use same tactics tomorrow against Sturt, Bays players won't be able to sneeze and they will be penalised!

What did he do to deserve 4? No one else can tell us.

[Eagles2014]

Was the bump shown in the highlights the actual incident Woodall was suspended for?

I don't know, just assumed that it was due to it being shown in the package, in relation to Boyd's injury...

Could have been for a separate incident altogether?

Was not the incident everyone is talking about, happened after that. Video footage was not great. Was ordinary what Woodall did. He deserved four matches. Lokan to use same tactics tomorrow against Sturt, Bays players won't be able to sneeze and they will be penalised!

What did he do to deserve 4? No one else can tell us.

Raised his elbow, this contributed to Boyd's injury. Not that clear on video, but he got what he deserved. Four reports in last year or so equals thug. Was pinching Boyd all game, how about trying to get a kick!

[ferret]

You are spot on Eagles2014 and you are in a position to KNOW.
It is ridiculous for any bay supporter to even suggest that the Eagles went out to with the intention of matching the bay's niggling, sniping and general thuggery. The Eagles players had everything to lose, so the message was not to get sucked in. Woodall upended Boyd just a few seconds after the starting bounce with the ball nowhere in the vicinity.
It seems to me that if Woodall was reported three times in the reserves last year and Boyd was reported in an incident earlier this season with Woodall, it appears that all Woodall does is try to intimidate with dubious tactics.
Was starting to think the bays had made a very good choice in Lokan - having doubts now. He should have taken the opportunity in the last few games to see what his players could actually do by giving them a bit of freedom and possibly play some positive football and learn some new structures. Great opportunity lost. Just fired up the Eagles for their next clash against the bays.

[Magellan]

Was pinching Boyd all game

Ouchies.

Shades of Craig Kelly, or perhaps it was the first day of the month.