Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL finals

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby johntheclaret » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:08 pm

Dog Day Afternoon wrote:
Jim05 wrote:This is where the whole system is wrong. Once you have played a set number of AFL games you should be unable to play SANFL finals then you dont have all this crap to work out


Crap :shock: Your club voted for this. :lol:

His club voted for it, doesn't mean he agrees with it or that he had any say in which way his club voted.

This "your club voted for it" is just a load crap
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13279
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby Dog Day Afternoon » Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:31 pm

johntheclaret wrote:
Dog Day Afternoon wrote:
Jim05 wrote:This is where the whole system is wrong. Once you have played a set number of AFL games you should be unable to play SANFL finals then you dont have all this crap to work out


Crap :shock: Your club voted for this. :lol:

His club voted for it, doesn't mean he agrees with it or that he had any say in which way his club voted.

This "your club voted for it" is just a load crap


So you say he is a victim? A club is owned and controlled by the members of that club. About time the victims on this site stood up for what they believe in. Just my opinion.
Dog Day Afternoon
Member
 
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:09 am
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 21 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby CUTTERMAN » Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:45 am

What did you do to persuade you club not to vote yes Dog Day?
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2954
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 213 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby whufc » Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:28 am

CUTTERMAN wrote:What did you do to persuade you club not to vote yes Dog Day?


Mini protests at each home game last year once the debate came up for one
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 27453
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5565 times
Been liked: 2519 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby johntheclaret » Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:45 am

Dog Day Afternoon wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:
Dog Day Afternoon wrote:
Jim05 wrote:This is where the whole system is wrong. Once you have played a set number of AFL games you should be unable to play SANFL finals then you dont have all this crap to work out


Crap :shock: Your club voted for this. :lol:

His club voted for it, doesn't mean he agrees with it or that he had any say in which way his club voted.

This "your club voted for it" is just a load crap


So you say he is a victim? A club is owned and controlled by the members of that club. About time the victims on this site stood up for what they believe in. Just my opinion.

Not saying he's a victim at all. But how many members actually had a say in which way their club voted.
Did any of the SANFL clubs hold a vote with their members?
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13279
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby SANFLnut » Wed Sep 03, 2014 12:17 am

Squawk wrote:
SANFLnut wrote:O'Shea not qualified after playing Rd 22.


He was an emergency only. He didn't play.

O'Shea played AFL RD 22 and had 18 touches v Carlton. It was the Port website that have the list and said that if he played Rd 22 then he'd be ineligible.
SANFLnut
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:06 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 65 times
Grassroots Team: Happy Valley

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby SANFLnut » Wed Sep 03, 2014 12:27 am

#1 Steven Summerton
#2 Cameron Hitchcock
#3 Campbell Heath
#4 Brent Renouf*
#6 Jake Johansen
#7 Louis Sharrad
#8 Danny Butcher
#9 Angus Bruggemann
#10 Ben Haren
#11 John Butcher
#12 Matt Venter
#13 Cam O’Shea^
#14 Paul Stewart
#15 Lewis Stevenson
#16 Nathan Krakouer
#17 Tom Clurey
#18 Ben Sawford
#20 Henry Slattery
#22 Mason Shaw
#23 Sam Gordon
#26 Andrew Moore
#29 Anthony Biemans
#30 Sam Colquhoun*
#31 Mitch Harvey
#32 Jake Neade
#33 Darcy-Byrne Jones
#37 Kane Mitchell
#38 Ben Newton
#41 Brendon Ah Chee
#42 Zac Hawkins
#43 Karl Amon
#44 Tom Logan
#45 Daniel Flynn
#46 Sam Gray
#47 Sam Russell
#50 Robbie Young
#54 Aseri Raikiwasa

* in long-term injury rehabilitation
^ will no longer qualify if named to play AFL in Round 22
SANFLnut
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:06 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 65 times
Grassroots Team: Happy Valley

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby SimonH » Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:49 am

SANFLnut wrote:
Squawk wrote:
SANFLnut wrote:O'Shea not qualified after playing Rd 22.


He was an emergency only. He didn't play.

O'Shea played AFL RD 22 and had 18 touches v Carlton. It was the Port website that have the list and said that if he played Rd 22 then he'd be ineligible.
They mis-spoke, to use the current jargon. Round 22 had already been played when that list was published. They were referring to round 23 (which was each AFL club's 22nd match of the H&A season due to everyone having a bye at some stage). Having played in neither place last weekend, he remains at the moment on 10 SANFL and 9 AFL games. So presuming the rules are actually applied as written (i.e. they don't cease operating just 'cos the minor round is finished), he will not have "played... the majority of his football at SANFL level" if he plays AFL this weekend and it becomes 50:50. (Of course all sorts of permutations could follow if, e.g. Pahhhhhr AFL win, Pahhhhhr SANFL lose, he gets dropped and then plays a SANFL prelim final while Pahhhhhr AFL remain alive—he would then qualify for the SANFL GF if they make it.)

BTW, it's meaningless to publish the 'eligible players' list in the form that Port Adelaide published it. Gee, their SANFL-contracted players who are not on an AFL list, are eligible to play SANFL finals. Who knew? The point of the exercise should have been to identify only the AFL-listed players who were eligible.
SimonH
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:32 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 62 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby SimonH » Wed Sep 03, 2014 2:14 am

Rising Power wrote:
Squawk wrote:Plus Moore - 8 SANFL and 6 AFL, qualifies
Even though the PAFC website lists him as qualified with no disclaimers, if my reading of the wording of the rule is right—it doesn't say "during the minor round" and in fact directs attention to the period during which the AFL side is alive—then Andrew Moore could yet be disqualified from the SANFL GF if Port Adelaide reserves make it. He plays AFL this weekend, the Pahhhhhr win, plays AFL the next weekend (the Pahhhhr must lose otherwise the whole debate is redundant because they'll still be playing on SANFL GF weekend), then he's on 8:8, hasn't played the majority of his footy in the SANFL, and would not be eligible for selection in the SANFL GF.
SimonH
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:32 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 62 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby Rising Power » Wed Sep 03, 2014 11:51 am

SimonH wrote:
Rising Power wrote:
Squawk wrote:Plus Moore - 8 SANFL and 6 AFL, qualifies
Even though the PAFC website lists him as qualified with no disclaimers, if my reading of the wording of the rule is right—it doesn't say "during the minor round" and in fact directs attention to the period during which the AFL side is alive—then Andrew Moore could yet be disqualified from the SANFL GF if Port Adelaide reserves make it. He plays AFL this weekend, the Pahhhhhr win, plays AFL the next weekend (the Pahhhhr must lose otherwise the whole debate is redundant because they'll still be playing on SANFL GF weekend), then he's on 8:8, hasn't played the majority of his footy in the SANFL, and would not be eligible for selection in the SANFL GF.


No biggy. Apparently our top ups are too good so that will overcome the loss of any AFL players being ruled ineligible.
User avatar
Rising Power
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 5:14 pm
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 44 times
Grassroots Team: Hectorville

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby SimonH » Wed Sep 03, 2014 12:47 pm

Rising Power wrote:No biggy. Apparently our top ups are too good so that will overcome the loss of any AFL players being ruled ineligible.
If the PAFC website hype is right and Port Adelaide have 42 AFL-listed players to choose from this weekend, then it's a pretty safe bet that a couple of short strides will be put in, in 'holding back' AFL emergencies who are unlikely to be needed on Sunday (with late withdrawals of first- or second-year AFL-listed players from the SANFL side for 'general soreness' being a solid 2nd option). Because if only 22 were allocated to the AFL side, that would leave 20 AFL-listed players in the SANFL team. That's right: captain Steve Summerton alone among the 'top ups'. The chop would come to vice-captain and official 'leadership player' Henry Slattery (I'm sure he'll provide awesome leadership from the sidelines), Angus Bruggemann (with no Haren either, good luck in the ruck) and Nathan Krakouer. It'd be irrelevant whether Jake Johansen was fit for selection, 'cos he couldn't be picked.

Because Port won't drop AFL-listed players from its 2nds side in favour of mere 'top-ups', will it?
SimonH
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:32 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 62 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby Booney » Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:22 pm

It's quite interesting. The amount of time you lot spend working on excuses for not being able to beat Port, when clearly the coaches of your clubs spend time on actually beating us, as evident in a few games this year.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58211
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7467 times
Been liked: 10755 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby SimonH » Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:36 pm

Booney wrote:It's quite interesting. The amount of time you lot spend working on excuses for not being able to beat Port, when clearly the coaches of your clubs spend time on actually beating us, as evident in a few games this year.
Gee, you've obviously been paying close attention to the results this year if you think we're not able to beat Port.

BTW, I'm a supporter. My role in beating Port is confined to supporting from the sidelines. You'd be amazed how many people who post on SA Footy have such a modest role to play. If you have a larger role to play in beating Norwood, shouldn't you get back to work and stop messing around on the internet?
SimonH
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:32 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 62 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby Booney » Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:42 pm

SimonH wrote:
Booney wrote:It's quite interesting. The amount of time you lot spend working on excuses for not being able to beat Port, when clearly the coaches of your clubs spend time on actually beating us, as evident in a few games this year.


Gee, you've obviously been paying close attention to the results this year if you think we're not able to beat Port.

BTW, I'm a supporter. My role in beating Port is confined to supporting from the sidelines. You'd be amazed how many people who post on SA Footy have such a modest role to play. If you have a larger role to play in beating Norwood, shouldn't you get back to work and stop messing around on the internet?


Gee, you obviously can't read. :lol:

As for how I spend my time, very, very wisely. Thanks. ;)
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58211
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7467 times
Been liked: 10755 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby Rising Power » Wed Sep 03, 2014 2:33 pm

SimonH wrote:
Rising Power wrote:No biggy. Apparently our top ups are too good so that will overcome the loss of any AFL players being ruled ineligible.
If the PAFC website hype is right and Port Adelaide have 42 AFL-listed players to choose from this weekend, then it's a pretty safe bet that a couple of short strides will be put in, in 'holding back' AFL emergencies who are unlikely to be needed on Sunday (with late withdrawals of first- or second-year AFL-listed players from the SANFL side for 'general soreness' being a solid 2nd option). Because if only 22 were allocated to the AFL side, that would leave 20 AFL-listed players in the SANFL team. That's right: captain Steve Summerton alone among the 'top ups'. The chop would come to vice-captain and official 'leadership player' Henry Slattery (I'm sure he'll provide awesome leadership from the sidelines), Angus Bruggemann (with no Haren either, good luck in the ruck) and Nathan Krakouer. It'd be irrelevant whether Jake Johansen was fit for selection, 'cos he couldn't be picked.

Because Port won't drop AFL-listed players from its 2nds side in favour of mere 'top-ups', will it?


You forgot to mention that Campbell Heath being given a light run after 8 weeks out with a busted knee takes precedence over Slattery or Krakouer providing experience and leadership to a relatively young team in a SANFL League Semi Final.
User avatar
Rising Power
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 5:14 pm
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 44 times
Grassroots Team: Hectorville

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby sjt » Wed Sep 03, 2014 8:16 pm

Where are those advocates of the reserves debacle that were claiming port would come back to the pack, as injuries started to take their toll later in the season. Port have 19 full time professionals to choose from this weekend. They've probably got the smallest injury list of any sanfl club. As Roy laird said the advantage of not having to work and being able to recover has massive advantages (as well as afl facilities).

Anyway go power, hope you thrash the bendover club. Pickard can't lose regardless.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby matt35 » Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:25 pm

Yep because Port are completely dominant and unbeatable, just as their record of winning 2 of their last 7 games suggests.
No Surrender!
matt35
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: Darwin
Has liked: 513 times
Been liked: 51 times
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby sjt » Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:44 pm

matt35 wrote:Yep because Port are completely dominant and unbeatable, just as their record of winning 2 of their last 7 games suggests.


Missed the point.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby Rising Power » Wed Sep 03, 2014 10:05 pm

Here's an idea. Howabout the opposition coach selects Port's team for them? Better take that one to the next SANFL committee meeting.
User avatar
Rising Power
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 5:14 pm
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 44 times
Grassroots Team: Hectorville

Re: Magpies - Rules for Selection Eligibility in SANFL final

Postby CUTTERMAN » Wed Sep 03, 2014 10:06 pm

How about they just **** off
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2954
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 213 times
Been liked: 124 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 12 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |