Re: Crows Disgrace
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:24 pm
I spose 1 good thing to come out of this is that the "The Magpies Are Now The AFL Power Reserves" thread has stopped going round & around & around.
cracka wrote:I spose 1 good thing to come out of this is that the "The Magpies Are Now The AFL Power Reserves" thread has stopped going round & around & around.
topsywaldron wrote:The relentless f*ckwitdness of the Crows and Power supporters on this thread reminds me what we've lost when we admitted their f*cktard ilk into the SANFL.
topsywaldron wrote:The relentless f*ckwitdness of the Crows and Power supporters on this thread reminds me what we've lost when we admitted their f*cktard ilk into the SANFL.
kickinit wrote:topsywaldron wrote:The relentless f*ckwitdness of the Crows and Power supporters on this thread reminds me what we've lost when we admitted their f*cktard ilk into the SANFL.
English would be nice
topsywaldron wrote:kickinit wrote:topsywaldron wrote:The relentless f*ckwitdness of the Crows and Power supporters on this thread reminds me what we've lost when we admitted their f*cktard ilk into the SANFL.
English would be nice
Ilk throw you oik?
whufc wrote:Mainly aimed at the Crows fans
But would it be fair to see the majority of south australian football fans don't support the crows, when you take into account power supporters, interstate afl clubs supporters, SANFL ammo country fans who don't follow or support a side in the afl
whufc wrote:Mainly aimed at the Crows fans
But would it be fair to see the majority of south australian football fans don't support the crows, when you take into account power supporters, interstate afl clubs supporters, SANFL ammo country fans who don't follow or support a side in the afl
HH3 wrote:Do you know whats funny. How John Olsens on his way back to Adelaide to find out why Adelaide were given the go ahead to use the guernsey, and maybe renegotiate the revenue being split between the AFC and the 9 SANFL clubs, instead of the South Australian Crows keeping all the money.
Also, there was a reason the SANFL didnt sell the State guernsey in shops. It was to keep the jumper sacred, and so only deserving players were able to own one. Now thats ****** isnt it.
kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:Mainly aimed at the Crows fans
But would it be fair to see the majority of south australian football fans don't support the crows, when you take into account power supporters, interstate afl clubs supporters, SANFL ammo country fans who don't follow or support a side in the afl
Current membership tally for the crows is 46,275 and port is 39,706 difference off 6,569. I think a collingwood, hawthorn or essendon would make up the 7,000 shortfall themselves.
Jim05 wrote:kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:Mainly aimed at the Crows fans
But would it be fair to see the majority of south australian football fans don't support the crows, when you take into account power supporters, interstate afl clubs supporters, SANFL ammo country fans who don't follow or support a side in the afl
Current membership tally for the crows is 46,275 and port is 39,706 difference off 6,569. I think a collingwood, hawthorn or essendon would make up the 7,000 shortfall themselves.
Was just over 4,400 SA based Essendon members last year and they are aiming for 6,000 this year.
Would think Collingwood, Hawthorn and Carlton would have silmilar if not more
kickinit wrote:So the wonderful Graham Cornes has written a article saying port sabotage the crows wearing the state jumper because we are jealous. The funny thing about this, is our club was actually played through all of those years. Maybe his 2 sons could give him a lesson about the PAFC. I don't know how these people are even allowed in the media.
http://m.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/w ... 6820926106
kickinit wrote:I only heard the recap on triple m this afternoon, but apparently Whicker stated that the SANFL didn't actually own the state jumper, but also proceeded to say the crows would never wear it. So if the SANFL don't own it how can they say no? has Whicker lost the plot?
I actually wouldn't mind if the crows did a state jumper for heritage round. Singled out a year say 1994 and put all the players names that played that state game on the jumper. Then sold them off at a reasonable price and the proceeds went back to the SANFL clubs.
kickinit wrote:topsywaldron wrote:kickinit wrote:topsywaldron wrote:The relentless f*ckwitdness of the Crows and Power supporters on this thread reminds me what we've lost when we admitted their f*cktard ilk into the SANFL.
English would be nice
Ilk throw you oik?
nope didn't throw me, just trying to understand what you where saying. What have you lost. What has any power support on this thread said, to remind you of your so call loss?
kickinit wrote:Jim05 wrote:kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:Mainly aimed at the Crows fans
But would it be fair to see the majority of south australian football fans don't support the crows, when you take into account power supporters, interstate afl clubs supporters, SANFL ammo country fans who don't follow or support a side in the afl
Current membership tally for the crows is 46,275 and port is 39,706 difference off 6,569. I think a collingwood, hawthorn or essendon would make up the 7,000 shortfall themselves.
Was just over 4,400 SA based Essendon members last year and they are aiming for 6,000 this year.
Would think Collingwood, Hawthorn and Carlton would have silmilar if not more
completely forgot about carlton. Those 4 clubs always seem to have a very good following in Adelaide.
topsywaldron wrote:I rest my case re the whole English as a second language thing
Just sh*ts me to tears that you mindless sheep who follow the two AFL teams from Adelaide thinks the sun shines out of your collective ar*es.
You know what, I don't give a flying *uck what the Power or the Crowz do, pretend clubs in an artificial league, they do not, and will never, represent South Australian football heritage no matter how many state jumpers or creeds exploited for commercial advantage they flog off to the brain dead twerps who think they barrack for them.