SA Footy

FULL TIME @ GLIDEROL STADIUM

LEAGUE:

Final Scores

North - 17.10 = 112

Glenelg - 12.13 = 85

Roosters win by 27 points




GOAL KICKERS:

North - L.Johnston, L.Ryswyk 3, D.Stewart, C.Thiele, M.Clinch 2, J.Allan, C.Alleway, J.Bennett, M.Handby, A.Young 1

Glenelg - R.Kirkby, J.Trembath, D.Kirk 2, J.Lyons, K.Tenace, C.Curran, B.McIntyre, J.Davenport, T.Logan 1





FINAL STATS WINNERS: (Courtesy of Champion Data)

http://sanfl.championdata.com/matches/1 ... mmary.html




CROWD: 3,007 @ Gliderol Stadium




RESERVES:

Final Scores

North - 10.5 = 65

Glenelg - 7.15 = 57

Roosters win by 8 points




GOAL KICKERS:

North - J.Boras 5, L.Davey 2, J.Gregg, H.Cumming, Z.Makins 1

Glenelg - L.Hender 2, J.Weir, C.Nicholson, H.Gill, J.Hinge, T.McIntyre 1

Great win for the Roosters

Yeah Boi

You beautiful Cock's, Well Done

Tommy lynch 33 and 11 tackles. Pretty big game

we were shite except for 15 minutes of the 2nd term, bad delivery cost us dearly and north killed us on the turnover

the joker wrote:Tommy lynch 33 and 11 tackles. Pretty big game

AFL listed Tom Lynch

you little beauty, Thailand is celebrating!

North harder at the ball most of the game (and once too bloody hard at the man off the play...), especially the first quarter. Bays tried to get away with a sneaky win but North just lifted enough when it mattered. A missed opportunity for us.

As always Allan and Bennett sensational for North. K Thompson was very, very good in the second half. Lynch and Davenport stood out for the Bays.

Other than Norwood at the top, it seems a very even competition.

Pottsy wrote:North harder at the ball most of the game (and once too bloody hard at the man off the play...)

All reports were it was a fair hip and shoulder.

To be fair, I didn't actually see it, as I was busy yakking. But not all reports were so glowing - the four blokes I was standing with that saw it seemed to think it was a little off colour.

Great win (in the end!) but we conspired to let them back in twice when we were clearly controlling the game and that could have lost the game for us but at least we gutted it out!

A good all round effort lead by the usual suspects - Allan, Bennett, Thompson, Ivens etc. but I have to question the final 21 selected today?

Knowing Kirk (who was good for the Bays) was named to line up Fwd we gambled on dropping Hall because it was likely to be wet and that the Bays would play Kirk down back on 1 of our 3 tall fwds.

BUT NO we gambled on Blee to look after him all day! Blee is not up to playing on a much bigger opponent like Kirk. Blee is struggling to keep his place in the League team IMO so the the only other option was to move Miles which would have meant either Alleway or Johnston to CHB so we were lucky?

Surely after Hall kept his last 2 opponents in his past 2 games to 1 goal between them he would be considered at least as a defensive back up on the bench???

Go in next week with only Blee and Miles as key defenders then we will not get close to Nwd.

It was right in front of where I was standing. It was a fair shepherd just as the player with the ball kicked it. Considering that no Glenelg players seemed to protest the bump, suggests that it wasn't that bad.

Pottsy wrote:To be fair, I didn't actually see it, as I was busy yakking. But not all reports were so glowing - the four blokes I was standing with that saw it seemed to think it was a little off colour.

You by your own admission didn't see it so why would you comment??? Were the 4 blokes standing with you "off colour" meaning they are the typical Glenelg Sunday afternoon supporter or interested neutral, wear no GFC colours and only go to the Bay when the sun shines on the Sunday???

The Sleeping Giant wrote:

Pottsy wrote:North harder at the ball most of the game (and once too bloody hard at the man off the play...)

All reports were it was a fair hip and shoulder.

IMO, nothing really wrong with it. A bit late but thats footy.

Pottsy wrote:North harder at the ball most of the game. Bays tried to get away with a sneaky win but North just lifted enough when it mattered. A missed opportunity for us.

Sums it up IMO.

A radio commentator called for the hip and shoulder to be "looked at" and "toned down".

Can't blame football for getting soft, as the rule makers are just following main stream societies lead.

on the rails wrote:

Pottsy wrote:To be fair, I didn't actually see it, as I was busy yakking. But not all reports were so glowing - the four blokes I was standing with that saw it seemed to think it was a little off colour.

You by your own admission didn't see it so why would you comment??? Were the 4 blokes standing with you "off colour" meaning they are the typical Glenelg Sunday afternoon supporter or interested neutral, wear no GFC colours and only go to the Bay when the sun shines on the Sunday???

a) Because I'm opinionated, and don't like North Adelaide.

b) Colours.