SA Footy

FINAL SCORES @ ELIZABETH

LEAGUE:

Full Time

Central - 22.11 = 143

Glenelg - 6.14 = 50

Doggies win by 93 points



GOAL KICKERS:

Central - A.Obst 6, R.Williams 4, J.Sutherland, C.O'Sullivan 3, T.Dunne, L.Habel 2, J.Gowans, J.Schiller, I.Callinan 1

Glenelg - R.Kirkby, S.Snook 2, D.Meyer, A.Lally 1



FINAL STATS: http://www.sanfl.com.au/livestats/match3/

Mickan gooooooooone!

Notwithstanding the outstanding nature of the dogs, the bays team "on paper" is too good for that, youngsters or not

Which says to me it has become largely psychological

Mickan a clearly talented coach but can't see how he can remain given where this season is heading

something has to give

Just got home from the game very disappointing from Glenelg i expected a closer game i did not realise Glenelg were that bad not a bad effort by the Dogs with their B side well done good see some Bay supporters at the Ponderosa

stampy wrote:something has to give

hate to say it....coaching panel perhaps stampy?

I knew Glenelg were bad but I didn't know they were THAT bad.

Centrals jumped right out of the blocks, slamming home 6.4 to 0.4 in the first quarter, and the party continued up until 3 quarter time, where Centrals extended to lead to 90 points. The last quarter, with the game well and truly won for Centrals, saw Glenelg come back into it, but Centrals even outscored Glenelg by 3 points in the last quarter to win by 93 points.

The scary thing is this was an injury depleted Centrals side that did this carnage, with several of their young players playing very well today.

A very good win leading into the bye.

tigerpie wrote:

stampy wrote:something has to give

hate to say it....coaching panel perhaps stampy?

it doesnt look too good for rubbers

wow, woeful effort, what has happened to the bays? can they regroup next year to have anohter tilt or has their premiership window well and truly closed with this lot? 86 is 25 years ago, might have to wait at least another 6 years to have another crack??? comments on that one anybody?

hows the emperors position looking???

Embarrassing & shit. That's my match summary.

Wouldnt read too much into it, 5 day break shouldnt happen in SANFL, esp this time of year, Why wouldnt you play this game on Sunday with no AFL on in town?

'Tis strange programming. But the sort we've seen time and again.

Dutchy wrote:Wouldnt read too much into it, 5 day break shouldnt happen in SANFL, esp this time of year, Why wouldnt you play this game on Sunday with no AFL on in town?

Tends to explain why the Bays looked shagged from about the 3 minute mark......how close do you think you would have got tomorrow ???

Mr Irate wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Wouldnt read too much into it, 5 day break shouldnt happen in SANFL, esp this time of year, Why wouldnt you play this game on Sunday with no AFL on in town?

Tends to explain why the Bays looked shagged from about the 3 minute mark......how close do you think you would have got tomorrow ???

Dont think it would have changed the result, esp the way we are playing, but could of helped. Its no excuse but it is a contributing factor.

Dutchy wrote:Wouldnt read too much into it, 5 day break shouldnt happen in SANFL, esp this time of year, Why wouldnt you play this game on Sunday with no AFL on in town?

The Bays want the Queens Bday game, and they sign off on the schedule at the start of the season. Plenty of time to prepare for it. But if you want to make excuses go for it.

Mr Irate wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Wouldnt read too much into it, 5 day break shouldnt happen in SANFL, esp this time of year, Why wouldnt you play this game on Sunday with no AFL on in town?

Tends to explain why the Bays looked shagged from about the 3 minute mark......how close do you think you would have got tomorrow ???

The break reason is bullshit. Could've given us a 10 day break and we still would've been smashed.

Dutchy wrote:Wouldnt read too much into it, 5 day break shouldnt happen in SANFL, esp this time of year, Why wouldnt you play this game on Sunday with no AFL on in town?

Norwood had no problem with the 5 day break.

Nwd's 5 day break v Sth's 14 day break didn't do them any harm. But then again, Sth were s***

Still dumb programming though.

SJABC wrote:

Mr Irate wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Wouldnt read too much into it, 5 day break shouldnt happen in SANFL, esp this time of year, Why wouldnt you play this game on Sunday with no AFL on in town?

Tends to explain why the Bays looked shagged from about the 3 minute mark......how close do you think you would have got tomorrow ???

The break reason is bullshit. Could've given us a 10 day break and we still would've been smashed.

.....or a 14 day break, a home game, and an opposition with 17 fit blokes for half a game......I always said our 6 day break was a contributing factor to not winning by more that day.......

But for poor kicking GL would have beaten Obst easily today