SA Footy

New thread for season 2011 so that people don't have to dredge through the old thread from the last couple of seasons...

Will post any new and info on players being reported and then of course the outcome of their tribunal hearing...

Port Magpies' player John Butcher is free to play this weekend after having his striking charge withdrawn...

Butcher was reported in the season opener at AAMI Stadium last Saturday morning and was reported for striking Norwood skipper James Gallagher...

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6033841005

I assume Our Twins got off then?

Goes without saying.

CENTURION wrote:I assume Our Twins got off then?

That's a bit of a personal question don't you think Gazza?

The Gowans twins have opted for an early guilty plea BEFORE they are reported !

SDK wrote:The Gowans twins have opted for an early guilty plea BEFORE they are reported !

Guilty until proven innocent you reakon SDK

CENTURION wrote:I assume Our Twins got off then?

Apparantly after the team photo.

For the Gowans guilty until proven MORE guilty.

SDK wrote:The Gowans twins have opted for an early guilty plea BEFORE they are reported !

SDK wrote:For the Gowans guilty until proven MORE guilty.

As they say: Do unto others before they do unto you!

yes, Ackland is MUCH bigger than C. Gowans too!

Alleway (cleared) and Jonas (1 week) were the only cases heard tonight, as far as Im aware.

Constance_Perm wrote:Alleway (cleared) and Jonas (1 week) were the only cases heard tonight, as far as Im aware.

Yeah, just the 2 hearings tonight CP...

Interesting to read, as was mentioned earlier, the SANFL now have the points system the same as that in the AFL.

Jonas' suspension comes about based on the following:

http://www.sanfl.com.au/league/reports/ ... e_reports/

Intentional - Low Impact - High to Body
225 Base Points
-56.25 Good Record
168.75 Total
1 Match

How many points does he get for playing the game hard like a man and how it should be played.
Compare this non offence to the one in the GF that breaks a guy's jaw in a deliberate premeditated act that gets nothing !

SDK wrote:How many points does he get for playing the game hard like a man and how it should be played.
Compare this non offence to the one in the GF that breaks a guy's jaw in a deliberate premeditated act that gets nothing !

Ian Callinan didn't pre-meditate breaking Phillips' jaw SDK, he did intend on making contact with him in the act of the shepparding attempt and obviosuly last year, this new AFL style points system for the tribunal was not adopted so that's not relevant.

That being said though, it would be interesting to see the results of incidents from season's gone by had this new system been in place then. Callinan might have found himself missing games, James Gowans would have probably got more than 3 weeks for the 2007 GF Schubert incident.

I agree with CP's thoughts on the North v Port thread, this is not good that the SANFL have adopted this system now, I don't think there will be too many decisions that will please.

Big Phil wrote:

SDK wrote:How many points does he get for playing the game hard like a man and how it should be played.
Compare this non offence to the one in the GF that breaks a guy's jaw in a deliberate premeditated act that gets nothing !

Ian Callinan didn't pre-meditate breaking Phillips' jaw [/b]SDK, he did intend on making contact with him in the act of the shepparding attempt and obviosuly last year, this new AFL style points system for the tribunal was not adopted so that's not relevant.

That being said though, it would be interesting to see the results of incidents from season's gone by had this new system been in place then. Callinan might have found himself missing games, James Gowans would have probably got more than 3 weeks for the 2007 GF Schubert incident.

I agree with CP's thoughts on the North v Port thread, this is not good that the SANFL have adopted this system now, I don't think there will be too many decisions that will please.

At the same game were we big guy?

suck the last bit of juice from those sour grapes.

Big Phil wrote:Ian Callinan didn't pre-meditate breaking Phillips' jaw

staritski wrote:At the same game were we big guy?

As a matter of fact staritski, I was sitting on the boundary line for LifeFM and was about 10m away from where the bump was laid on Phillips by Callinan.

Enough said on that though, it is in the past, what has happened happened, Phillips himself said he felt there was nothing wrong with what Callinan did, it was just one of those footy things.

Anyway, this thread is about 2011 Reports and Tribunal hearings, probably best if we all just leave 2010 alone and move on, myself included.

Big Phil wrote:

Big Phil wrote:Ian Callinan didn't pre-meditate breaking Phillips' jaw

staritski wrote:At the same game were we big guy?

As a matter of fact staritski, I was sitting on the boundary line for LifeFM and was about 10m away from where the bump was laid on Phillips by Callinan.

Enough said on that though, it is in the past, what has happened happened, Phillips himself said he felt there was nothing wrong with what Callinan did, it was just one of those footy things.

Anyway, this thread is about 2011 Reports and Tribunal hearings, probably best if we all just leave 2010 alone and move on, myself included.

delete.