Page 1 of 1

Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 2:34 pm
by Ecky
1 page instead of 2 pages in Friday's paper
1 page instead of 2 pages in Monday's paper

why?

Plus the Sunday Mail/Advertiser gave 3 different versions of the Glenelg goalscorers in the Sunday/Monday papers, all of which were wrong!

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 2:39 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
because now port are one club they can halve the coverage

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:19 pm
by Squawk
They probably want less in print and more emphasis on the online content.

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:32 pm
by topsywaldron
haven't read this in the paper anywhere.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/zzz ... 6033102822

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:35 pm
by Big Phil
topsywaldron wrote:haven't read this in the paper anywhere.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/zzz ... 6033102822


I think it only became public news this morning, perhaps there will be something in tomorrow's paper?

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:00 pm
by spell_check
Squawk wrote:They probably want less in print and more emphasis on the online content.


As opposed to the AFL content, where they want more in print and more online.

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:18 pm
by Aerie
Can't say I've bought the paper for a while. The online coverage is excellent though and has improved greatly in the last couple of years. Overall I reckon it's better now than it has been for a long time.

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:29 pm
by mal
Ecky wrote:1 page instead of 2 pages in Friday's paper
1 page instead of 2 pages in Monday's paper

why?

Plus the Sunday Mail/Advertiser gave 3 different versions of the Glenelg goalscorers in the Sunday/Monday papers, all of which were wrong!


But we still get front page coverage of the AFL clubs !

Saturday 26/3/2011
There was a front page picture of Nathan Van Berlo, Chris Mcdermott, and some woman born on the day AC first played HW
On page 3 a 25 year old guy was amazingly cured of cancer
He was given days to live, took a new drug, and was cured in a few days
But then again the Crows are more important than a potential Cancer Cure

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:22 pm
by CENTURION
easy....CENTRALS weren't playing!!

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:51 pm
by Dogwatcher
Mal, the Crows are a cancer.

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 10:23 pm
by Mark_Beswick
On the Glenelg Goal-kickers,

The SANFL Site, Glenelg Stats Page, And Sunday Mail differ - Which source is correct?

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 10:49 pm
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR
Mark_Beswick wrote:On the Glenelg Goal-kickers,

The SANFL Site, Glenelg Stats Page, And Sunday Mail differ - Which source is correct?

Normally I'd go with the Glenelg stat's page off Snouts, but I just noticed Drew Clayfield's goal is missing from there.

Should be: Goals: Kirkby 3, Kane, Adlington, Tenace, Murphy, Ruwoldt, Agnew, Cranston, Grima, Kirk, Hancock" plus Clayfield
14 Goals from 12 different players - Bays fans, we have gotta be happy with that :D

Re: Advertiser SANFL Coverage halved?

PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:02 am
by Ecky
Correct WAGY!