by Sojourner » Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:39 am
by Barto » Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:21 pm
Under the proposed arrangement, the clubs will share office and social club facilities and offer joint AFL-SANFL club membership, providing huge savings and the ability to generate more revenue
by Mark_Beswick » Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:55 pm
by Lynwood » Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:33 pm
by bayman » Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:40 pm
Barto wrote:It doesn't appear to be a full merger:Under the proposed arrangement, the clubs will share office and social club facilities and offer joint AFL-SANFL club membership, providing huge savings and the ability to generate more revenue
Isn't this is what is happening now anyway? I dont have a problem with it, let them go.
I still think if a full merger went ahead, the Power would just wrap the Magpies up saying it's all too hard, keep all the assets and blame everyone else. The Power supporters are a strange mob, declaring that the Magpies are a fake club formed in 1997 stealing their heritage.
by birdmanptr » Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:51 pm
by beenreal » Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:09 pm
bayman wrote:Barto wrote:It doesn't appear to be a full merger:Under the proposed arrangement, the clubs will share office and social club facilities and offer joint AFL-SANFL club membership, providing huge savings and the ability to generate more revenue
Isn't this is what is happening now anyway? I dont have a problem with it, let them go.
I still think if a full merger went ahead, the Power would just wrap the Magpies up saying it's all too hard, keep all the assets and blame everyone else. The Power supporters are a strange mob, declaring that the Magpies are a fake club formed in 1997 stealing their heritage.
read todays budget on the port page which is on page 36 & there it is in black & white (pun intended) club formed 1870 & as most of us know the magpies ARE THE REAL PORT & the power are an afl franchise using the port name
by Voice » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:51 am
beenreal wrote:bayman wrote:Barto wrote:It doesn't appear to be a full merger:Under the proposed arrangement, the clubs will share office and social club facilities and offer joint AFL-SANFL club membership, providing huge savings and the ability to generate more revenue
Isn't this is what is happening now anyway? I dont have a problem with it, let them go.
I still think if a full merger went ahead, the Power would just wrap the Magpies up saying it's all too hard, keep all the assets and blame everyone else. The Power supporters are a strange mob, declaring that the Magpies are a fake club formed in 1997 stealing their heritage.
read todays budget on the port page which is on page 36 & there it is in black & white (pun intended) club formed 1870 & as most of us know the magpies ARE THE REAL PORT & the power are an afl franchise using the port name
BLAH, BLAH, BLAH.. love other supporters telling us all about OUR club. Why don't you worry about your own club's increasingly embarrassing history?
by CENTURION » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:53 am
by Booney » Mon Oct 04, 2010 12:52 pm
bayman wrote:Barto wrote:It doesn't appear to be a full merger:Under the proposed arrangement, the clubs will share office and social club facilities and offer joint AFL-SANFL club membership, providing huge savings and the ability to generate more revenue
Isn't this is what is happening now anyway? I dont have a problem with it, let them go.
I still think if a full merger went ahead, the Power would just wrap the Magpies up saying it's all too hard, keep all the assets and blame everyone else. The Power supporters are a strange mob, declaring that the Magpies are a fake club formed in 1997 stealing their heritage.
read todays budget on the port page which is on page 36 & there it is in black & white (pun intended) club formed 1870 & as most of us know the magpies ARE THE REAL PORT & the power are an afl franchise using the port name
by Barto » Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:20 pm
Booney wrote:Yep, you're just so spot on it is hard to believe. 14 years of debate and you just nail it in one sentence.
by Media Park » Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:51 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by beenreal » Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:27 pm
Media Park wrote:Port Adelaide Magpies FC- great club, tremendous history, impressive resume, even if they are in a bit of a lull at the mo.
Port Adelaide FC (The Power)- Crap. No history, so they've stolen the history of another football Club.
by Media Park » Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:35 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by beenreal » Mon Oct 04, 2010 6:18 pm
by Media Park » Mon Oct 04, 2010 6:20 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by heater31 » Mon Oct 04, 2010 6:24 pm
beenreal wrote:For a period of history, there was only one Germany until 1945. When they were divided, which was the real one?
by beenreal » Mon Oct 04, 2010 6:38 pm
heater31 wrote:beenreal wrote:For a period of history, there was only one Germany until 1945. When they were divided, which was the real one?
you can't compare the 2 Port Adelaide Football Clubs to Post war Germany![]()
Legally speaking and it has been mentioned on here several times before that the Port Adelaide Magpies Football Club is the real Port Adelaide FC.
I am by no way a Port Adelaide fan but nothing irks me more than seeing images of the back of the Power's jumper with Est 1870. The AFL Port Adelaide should have Est 1996 FFS!
by Media Park » Mon Oct 04, 2010 6:44 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by heater31 » Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:06 pm
beenreal wrote:heater31 wrote:beenreal wrote:For a period of history, there was only one Germany until 1945. When they were divided, which was the real one?
you can't compare the 2 Port Adelaide Football Clubs to Post war Germany![]()
Legally speaking and it has been mentioned on here several times before that the Port Adelaide Magpies Football Club is the real Port Adelaide FC.
I am by no way a Port Adelaide fan but nothing irks me more than seeing images of the back of the Power's jumper with Est 1870. The AFL Port Adelaide should have Est 1996 FFS!
Quite simply, you can't compare because you don't want to.
As a PAFC Member, I wasn't asked to vote to create a team for the AFL, I was asked to vote to move from the SANFL to the AFL.
And as a PAFC Member, at the same meeting I was asked to vote on maintaining (not create) a presence in the SANFL.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |