Page 1 of 5
Qualifying Final 2010 Glenelg v Norwood
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:39 pmby bayman
can norwood bounce back from their defeat by glenelg last week ? both teams have some injury concerns but i think glenelg will overcome a gallant norwood & win running away as they did last time at the bay, the extra days rest could prove vital as both teams played on a boggy ground, bays by 5 or 6 goals
Qualifying Final - Glenelg v Norwood @ AAMI (Sun 12/9)
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:40 pmby Big Phil
This will be an intruiging game, both sides carrying a couple of injuries into the game to key players...
Not sure at this early stage what way it will go, Glenelg may just have too much experience in finals for the Legs...
Re: Qualifying Final - Glenelg v Norwood @ AAMI (Sun 12/9)
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:41 pmby csbowes
I'm happy to pump the Bays up... I'll be surprised if Norwood get within 8 goals by siren time.
Re: Qualifying Final - Glenelg v Norwood @ AAMI (Sun 12/9)
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:42 pmby Big Phil
From what I hear, it sounds like Ben Mules may be the only injured Bay player that wont come up for next week...
Re: qualifying final 2010 glenelg v norwood
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:53 pmby Aerie
There was a lot of talk from various coaches about Norwood being the best team they've played this season.
I just can't see it. Glenelg and Central are a cut above and will be surprised if any of the other 3 get within 5 goals of them this finals series.
Re: qualifying final 2010 glenelg v norwood
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:54 pmby am Bays
I think it is best if we give all games at least 24 hrs before we start discussing next weeks games.
Re: qualifying final 2010 glenelg v norwood
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:04 pmby twosheds
am Bays wrote:I think it is best if we give all games at least 24 hrs before we start discussing next weeks games.
OK Dad.
Re: qualifying final 2010 glenelg v norwood
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:08 pmby 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR
am Bays wrote:I think it is best if we give all games at least 24 hrs before we start discussing next weeks games.
I've had the last 24 hrs to live through our Rnd 23 loss am Bays please let me start looking forward and focussing on next week... please
Re: qualifying final 2010 glenelg v norwood
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:10 pmby therisingblues
twosheds wrote:am Bays wrote:I think it is best if we give all games at least 24 hrs before we start discussing next weeks games.
OK Dad.
Careful, there'll be no supper for you if you push him.
Re: qualifying final 2010 glenelg v norwood
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:14 pmby bayman
am Bays wrote:I think it is best if we give all games at least 24 hrs before we start discussing next weeks games.
usually, but finals are more important than reviews of round 23
Re: qualifying final 2010 glenelg v norwood
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:29 pmby JAS
am Bays wrote:I think it is best if we give all games at least 24 hrs before we start discussing next weeks games.
Spot on...very inconsiderate and disrespectful of todays games imo
Regards
JAS
Re: Qualifying Final 2010 Glenelg v Norwood
Posted:
Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:35 pmby SpionKopster
Nah JAS! Embrace what's in front of us.
3rd spot, fabulous effort from our club after a 0-4 start!
Blah, blah, blah ......... bring on Sunday, I can't wait!
I'm confident Norwood will progress to the 2nd Semi Final.
Legs by a couple of kicks!
Re: qualifying final 2010 glenelg v norwood
Posted:
Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:04 amby NFC
JAS wrote:am Bays wrote:I think it is best if we give all games at least 24 hrs before we start discussing next weeks games.
Spot on...very inconsiderate and disrespectful of todays games imo
Regards
JAS
Seriously?
Re: Qualifying Final 2010 Glenelg v Norwood
Posted:
Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:10 amby Jimmy
gays by 4 goals, too strong for the legs.
Re: qualifying final 2010 glenelg v norwood
Posted:
Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:25 amby JAS
NFC wrote:JAS wrote:am Bays wrote:I think it is best if we give all games at least 24 hrs before we start discussing next weeks games.
Spot on...very inconsiderate and disrespectful of todays games imo
Regards
JAS
Seriously?
Yes seriously...it's my opinion and I stand by it.
Not only that but itthe Finals threads also seem to have proved confusing for some on here as I ended up having to move posts out of the other finals thread because people started posting about todays game in that one.
24hrs grace to allow people to concentrate on todays games wouldn't have killed anyone.
Regards
JAS
Re: Qualifying Final 2010 Glenelg v Norwood
Posted:
Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:31 amby dedja
Jimmy wrote:gays by 4 goals, too strong for the legs.
FFS get it right ... happy and gay.
Re: Qualifying Final 2010 Glenelg v Norwood
Posted:
Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:14 amby Voice
dedja wrote:Jimmy wrote:gays by 4 goals, too strong for the legs.
FFS get it right ... happy and gay.
If you ask that Melbourne school teacher it should be happy and
fun 
Re: Qualifying Final 2010 Glenelg v Norwood
Posted:
Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:27 amby Grahaml
Why do we have to tell people what they can talk about and when? Surely anyone wanting to discuss the last game all week (as dogs fans will this week with nothing else to do) they should be able to while anyone wanting to talk about the next game right away should be able to. Heck, some people might even be skilled enough to do both!
Re: Qualifying Final 2010 Glenelg v Norwood
Posted:
Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:07 amby Mad Mat
Grahaml wrote:Why do we have to tell people what they can talk about and when? Surely anyone wanting to discuss the last game all week (as dogs fans will this week with nothing else to do) they should be able to while anyone wanting to talk about the next game right away should be able to. Heck, some people might even be skilled enough to do both!
Nah, they'll be in this thread offering us all their insightful central centric comments.
