by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:02 pm
by devilsadvocate » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:28 pm
by RoosterMarty » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:34 pm
by 71/72 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:38 pm
by Punk Rooster » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:41 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by drifter » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:42 pm
by devilsadvocate » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:48 pm
by MUNGO JERRY » Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:07 pm
by Royal City » Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:32 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:All players on both sides did quite well in shocking conditions. I missed the 1st q and the 2nd was rubbish, but the 2nd half was a cracker considering.
I thought the umpiring was an absolute disgrace. They didn't favour either side but they just picked out some baffling and soft frees for both sides. FFS let the play go in **** conditions you fame seeking wankers.
I was really impressed yet again with port's endeavour. Every player was 100% committed to the cause and having lead for the majority of the day it was very disappointing to lose.
Once again costly mistakes in crucial positions at crucial moments just killed us. I guess that's life with so many young inexperienced players. I'm sure bangers will help them turn it around and providing the current crop stays together, the Magpies will be better for their 2010 experience next year.
Despite the disappointment of losing so many games by bugger all in 2010, I'm really positive about what Port achieved and am looking forward to some progression in 2011.
by FlyingHigh » Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:07 pm
by robranisgod » Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:15 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Crowd according to AdelaideNow 2272. Pretty good I would have thought given the conditions and nothing on it for the teams.
by am Bays » Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:45 pm
by fish » Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:02 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Crowd according to AdelaideNow 2272. Pretty good I would have thought given the conditions and nothing on it for the teams.
by G » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:01 pm
by Lynwood » Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:17 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Crowd according to AdelaideNow 2272. Pretty good I would have thought given the conditions and nothing on it for the teams.
by beenreal » Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:05 am
Royal City wrote:How the might have fallen. YAWN!!!!
by Lynwood » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:15 am
by robranisgod » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:40 am
beenreal wrote:Royal City wrote:How the might have fallen. YAWN!!!!
Hope you didn't put more than 3 hours of intensely, creative thought into that post?
Port lead for most of the day and looked the better side. North put their score on the board in bursts, including the burst that mattered near the end of the game.
Typical with kids, they thought they had the game won and took their foot off the pedal at a crucial time, allowing a more experienced side to seize the moment.
Not happy with losing but very happy with the improvement in talent, discipline and endeavour over the season.
by Royal City » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:10 pm
beenreal wrote:Royal City wrote:How the mighty have fallen. YAWN!!!!
Not happy with losing but very happy with the improvement in talent, discipline and endeavour over the season.
by on the rails » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:16 pm
robranisgod wrote:beenreal wrote:Royal City wrote:How the might have fallen. YAWN!!!!
Hope you didn't put more than 3 hours of intensely, creative thought into that post?
Port lead for most of the day and looked the better side. North put their score on the board in bursts, including the burst that mattered near the end of the game.
Typical with kids, they thought they had the game won and took their foot off the pedal at a crucial time, allowing a more experienced side to seize the moment.
Not happy with losing but very happy with the improvement in talent, discipline and endeavour over the season.
The only thing I could disagree with is according to the statistics in the budget Port had the more experienced side in terms of games played and average age of the players.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |