'Stirling'gate

All discussions to do with the SANFL

'Stirling'gate

Postby Big Phil » Fri Sep 03, 2010 10:55 am

User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20299
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby JK » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:05 am

Whilst less accepted in society these days, a decent blue with your mates while on the gas certainly is a bonding exercise.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby devilsadvocate » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:11 am

Constance_Perm wrote:Whilst less accepted in society these days, a decent blue with your mates while on the gas certainly is a bonding exercise.


Sorry mate, disagree. I know the other side of the story and North's involvement is a disgrace. If it was a fair, even fight then I might be able to understand, but what actually happened was far from.

The article fails to mention what happened to the other involved parties in all this.

Glen Elliot has a vested interest obviously. His son works at the hotel and he is good mates with the owner apparently. This will no doubt be swept under the carpet and kept as quiet as possible.
User avatar
devilsadvocate
Coach
 
Posts: 6872
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:28 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby JK » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:14 am

devilsadvocate wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:Whilst less accepted in society these days, a decent blue with your mates while on the gas certainly is a bonding exercise.


Sorry mate, disagree. I know the other side of the story and North's involvement is a disgrace. If it was a fair, even fight then I might be able to understand, but what actually happened was far from.

The article fails to mention what happened to the other involved parties in all this.

Glen Elliot has a vested interest obviously. His son works at the hotel and he is good mates with the owner apparently. This will no doubt be swept under the carpet and kept as quiet as possible.


My point wasn't necessarily about the Stirling situation, I guess more a hark back to the old days when a bit of a dust up alongside your teammates certainly contributed to the bonding process.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:22 am

devilsadvocate wrote:Sorry mate, disagree. I know the other side of the story and North's involvement is a disgrace. If it was a fair, even fight then I might be able to understand, but what actually happened was far from.

The article fails to mention what happened to the other involved parties in all this.

Glen Elliot has a vested interest obviously. His son works at the hotel and he is good mates with the owner apparently. This will no doubt be swept under the carpet and kept as quiet as possible.


Perhaps you could fill us in then. The article also failed to identify the other parties, let alone what happened to them or their role in the fracas, and I'm mystified as to why you would think Glen Elliot's "vested interest" would be swept under the carpet.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby darley16 » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:27 am

This is a big deal :roll: ? Hardly, this is M Rucci's baby to attack NAFC while promoting PAMFC and Power merger painting NAFC as the enemy of both Port's in his pathetic style of seeking revenge on all those that simply question or resist propping up a club with SANFL monies or merging the two Port's to the possible detriment of the entire comp. Footy club punch ups are not a good look but it's been happening ever since mixing too many young blokes with too many beers.
User avatar
darley16
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:07 am
Has liked: 232 times
Been liked: 58 times

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby hawkseye » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:31 am

From what i have been told some of the locals up there didnt like the way the boys took over their pub and decided to belt one of them from behind and it escalated from there with a few of the bigger rooster boys sorting a few locals out.....
Thats what im talkin aboooouuuut!!!!!!
User avatar
hawkseye
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3053
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: chappell bar
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: West Croydon

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby Royal City » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:33 am



Oh Rucci. You make it so obvious.
Royal City
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:12 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby The Apostle » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:34 am

darley16 wrote:This is a big deal :roll: ? Hardly, this is M Rucci's baby to attack NAFC while promoting PAMFC and Power merger painting NAFC as the enemy of both Port's in his pathetic style of seeking revenge on all those that simply question or resist propping up a club with SANFL monies or merging the two Port's to the possible detriment of the entire comp. Footy club punch ups are not a good look but it's been happening ever since mixing too many young blokes with too many beers.

Exactly!!!
The Apostle
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1702
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby Ronnie » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:36 am

darley16 wrote:This is a big deal :roll: ? Hardly, this is M Rucci's baby to attack NAFC while promoting PAMFC and Power merger painting NAFC as the enemy of both Port's in his pathetic style of seeking revenge on all those that simply question or resist propping up a club with SANFL monies or merging the two Port's to the possible detriment of the entire comp. Footy club punch ups are not a good look but it's been happening ever since mixing too many young blokes with too many beers.


I tend to agree, put it this way, the prominence it was given the other day by the paper (was it Tuesday?), seemed very surprising to me. Rucci was in full flight yet normally can't get a sliver of SANFL news in the paper unless it is related to Port merger efforts. The comibination of North and negativity was too much.
Ronnie
Reserves
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby devilsadvocate » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:44 am

demonseye wrote:From what i have been told some of the locals up there didnt like the way the boys took over their pub and decided to belt one of them from behind and it escalated from there with a few of the bigger rooster boys sorting a few locals out.....


Didn't happen :roll:
User avatar
devilsadvocate
Coach
 
Posts: 6872
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:28 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby devilsadvocate » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:46 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote:Perhaps you could fill us in then. The article also failed to identify the other parties, let alone what happened to them or their role in the fracas, and I'm mystified as to why you would think Glen Elliot's "vested interest" would be swept under the carpet.


GE is mates with the hotel owner and his son works there. A huge street fight out the front of the Stirling is Bad publicity for both the NA and Stirling hotel.

Why wouldn't he want to sweep it under the carpet?
User avatar
devilsadvocate
Coach
 
Posts: 6872
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:28 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:50 am

devilsadvocate wrote:
demonseye wrote:From what i have been told some of the locals up there didnt like the way the boys took over their pub and decided to belt one of them from behind and it escalated from there with a few of the bigger rooster boys sorting a few locals out.....


Didn't happen :roll:


Don't tell us what didn't happen, tell us what did.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:52 am

devilsadvocate wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Perhaps you could fill us in then. The article also failed to identify the other parties, let alone what happened to them or their role in the fracas, and I'm mystified as to why you would think Glen Elliot's "vested interest" would be swept under the carpet.


GE is mates with the hotel owner and his son works there. A huge street fight out the front of the Stirling is Bad publicity for both the NA and Stirling hotel.

Why wouldn't he want to sweep it under the carpet?


You honestly think a couple of footballers getting into a scrape would prevent people from attending the pub? If that were the case, most pubs in Australia would have closed down by now.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby mick » Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:53 am

A storm in a tea cup stirred with a Stirling silver teaspoon. In today's Advertiser it says the SANFL is happy with North's response so far. What possible influence this could have on the merger of the two Port entitities is beyond me? I don't think NAFC or anyone else will be changing their minds over this minor incident. Mr Rucci is simply maintaining his reputation as a hard hitting contraversial football journalist :lol:
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby hawkseye » Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:09 pm

devilsadvocate wrote:
demonseye wrote:From what i have been told some of the locals up there didnt like the way the boys took over their pub and decided to belt one of them from behind and it escalated from there with a few of the bigger rooster boys sorting a few locals out.....


Didn't happen :roll:

Right then. I will go back to my source and he can tell the rooster involved he is a liar.
Thats what im talkin aboooouuuut!!!!!!
User avatar
hawkseye
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3053
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: chappell bar
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: West Croydon

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby EAGLES » Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:12 pm

any truth that one of the north players involved was not of legal drinking age?
EAGLES
Member
 
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:07 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby topsywaldron » Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:30 pm

mick wrote:Stirling silver teaspoon


We're good honest working class types up here Mick.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby devilsadvocate » Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:47 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
devilsadvocate wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Perhaps you could fill us in then. The article also failed to identify the other parties, let alone what happened to them or their role in the fracas, and I'm mystified as to why you would think Glen Elliot's "vested interest" would be swept under the carpet.


GE is mates with the hotel owner and his son works there. A huge street fight out the front of the Stirling is Bad publicity for both the NA and Stirling hotel.

Why wouldn't he want to sweep it under the carpet?


You honestly think a couple of footballers getting into a scrape would prevent people from attending the pub? If that were the case, most pubs in Australia would have closed down by now.


Most people no. But have you been to the Stirling recently? It's not really pitching at the outback-punchon-with-ya-mates-Walkabout type clientelle.

The place has been upgraded significantly to attract non fighting patrons, so any news of a massive fight out the front is hardly going to bring these people rushing through the doors is it.

I hope it doesn't impact the Stirling's business as the owner has done a lot of hard work to bring the place up to the standard it is today.
User avatar
devilsadvocate
Coach
 
Posts: 6872
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:28 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 'Stirling'gate

Postby CUTTERMAN » Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:27 pm

What I want to know is where was Leigh Treeby when this was happening :)
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |