by magpie in the 80's » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:33 pm
by stampy » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:45 pm
by Dutchy » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:53 pm
by blues2002 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:01 pm
Dutchy wrote:Good result for the bays, thanks Sturt
by topsywaldron » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:09 pm
Dutchy wrote:Good result for the bays, thanks Sturt
by Dog-boy » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:13 pm
by blues2002 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:13 pm
topsywaldron wrote:And Norwood as well.
by blues2002 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:15 pm
Dog-boy wrote:The problem is teams seem to have issues backing up after beating the Dogs.
Time will tell!!
by cennals05 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:21 pm
topsywaldron wrote:Dutchy wrote:Good result for the bays, thanks Sturt
And Norwood as well.
by blues2002 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:26 pm
by cennals05 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:30 pm
blues2002 wrote:Wow, looking at Round 23, what a perfect set of matchups:
Central District v Glenelg (Elizabeth)
Most likely be the battle for top spot. Hard hitout pre finals, deserves an 8000+ crowd.
Norwood v West Adelaide (Norwood)
Eagles v Sturt (Woodville)
All four teams playing to finish anywhere from 3rd to 7th.
Port Magpies v North Adelaide (Alberton)
Maybe one of these teams will have a mathematical chance to make the finals. I'd consider going just to see devilsadvocate get angry about being robbed again by that cheating umpire they had today (I hope he gets the job for this rematch).
by CUTTERMAN » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:39 pm
by Dutchy » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:42 pm
cennals05 wrote:blues2002 wrote:Wow, looking at Round 23, what a perfect set of matchups:
Central District v Glenelg (Elizabeth)
Most likely be the battle for top spot. Hard hitout pre finals, deserves an 8000+ crowd.
Norwood v West Adelaide (Norwood)
Eagles v Sturt (Woodville)
All four teams playing to finish anywhere from 3rd to 7th.
Port Magpies v North Adelaide (Alberton)
Maybe one of these teams will have a mathematical chance to make the finals. I'd consider going just to see devilsadvocate get angry about being robbed again by that cheating umpire they had today (I hope he gets the job for this rematch).
I'm hoping we finish 2nd, to really get the psychological advantage over Glenelg.
by Mr Irate » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:56 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Great game, thought it was umpired reasonably well, skills were lacking, lots of turnovers and bad disposal by foot. The amount of time Centrals kicked along the ground, as in worm burners, not sure what was going on. Thought it was a good move with Hinge in defence, he had a good game. Sturt still are lacking with forward crumbers and it's been our problem for many years.
Attendance was disappointing but well behaved apart from a few wankers after the game infront of the McKay stand on both sides.
End result- Sturt live another week and Doggies roll on.
by CUTTERMAN » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:02 pm
Mr Irate wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Great game, thought it was umpired reasonably well, skills were lacking, lots of turnovers and bad disposal by foot. The amount of time Centrals kicked along the ground, as in worm burners, not sure what was going on. Thought it was a good move with Hinge in defence, he had a good game. Sturt still are lacking with forward crumbers and it's been our problem for many years.
Attendance was disappointing but well behaved apart from a few wankers after the game infront of the McKay stand on both sides.
End result- Sturt live another week and Doggies roll on.
How much does it cost to put up that temporary fence ? Would the punters who actually paid at the gate covered the cost ?
by EasyE » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:07 pm
by Mr Irate » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:12 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Mr Irate wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Great game, thought it was umpired reasonably well, skills were lacking, lots of turnovers and bad disposal by foot. The amount of time Centrals kicked along the ground, as in worm burners, not sure what was going on. Thought it was a good move with Hinge in defence, he had a good game. Sturt still are lacking with forward crumbers and it's been our problem for many years.
Attendance was disappointing but well behaved apart from a few wankers after the game infront of the McKay stand on both sides.
End result- Sturt live another week and Doggies roll on.
How much does it cost to put up that temporary fence ? Would the punters who actually paid at the gate covered the cost ?
Not sure what the break even costs are, but it costs us about $2000-$3000 more per game than any other club to host a home game.
Makes you wonder why port magpies are in the **** they are!!!!!!!!!!
by on the rails » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:12 pm
blues2002 wrote: Port Magpies v North Adelaide (Alberton)
Maybe one of these teams will have a mathematical chance to make the finals. I'd consider going just to see devilsadvocate get angry about being robbed again by that cheating umpire they had today (I hope he gets the job for this rematch).
by CUTTERMAN » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:25 pm
EasyE wrote:Awesome that 95% of the scoring today was at the end where no one can get near. Couldn't tell what happened for most of the game as i wasn't carrying a telescope. Steak sandwich was a lot better than what ive had in the past there.
by fish » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:39 pm
stampy wrote:well done sturt, got to hand it to them, they seem to have the game plan to knock those doggies off regularly, wish the bays had their secret!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |