RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

All discussions to do with the SANFL

RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby magpie in the 80's » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:33 pm

Final Score
Sturt 12.13 (85)
Central 9.7 (61)

Goals
Sturt: Vassal 3, Johncock, Giles 2; Hassan, Evans, Nelson, McIntyre, Bode ea 1
Central: Callinan 4; Sansbury, Spurr, Thomas, Habel, Switala ea 1

Best
Sturt: Gum, Vassal, Hinge, Johncock, Thurstans, McGlone, Bode.
Central: Callinan, Spurr, Thomas, Nash, Boyd

QxQ
Sturt......5.3....6.4...11.10..12.13 (85)
Central...0.0...5.4.....7.5......9.7 (61)


Reserves
Sturt: 9.8.62
Central: 12.6.78

U/18's
Sturt 14.13-97
Central 4.4-28
I went to a fight the other night, and a hockey game broke out. - Rodney Dangerfield (1921 - 2004)
User avatar
magpie in the 80's
Coach
 
 
Posts: 35437
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 7:56 pm
Location: in the quiz books
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 24 times

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby stampy » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:45 pm

well done sturt, got to hand it to them, they seem to have the game plan to knock those doggies off regularly, wish the bays had their secret!
Go The Tiges!!!
stampy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has liked: 75 times
Been liked: 364 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby Dutchy » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:53 pm

Good result for the bays, thanks Sturt
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45967
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2579 times
Been liked: 4197 times

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby blues2002 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:01 pm

Dutchy wrote:Good result for the bays, thanks Sturt


You're most welcome.
User avatar
blues2002
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:14 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 6 times
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby topsywaldron » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:09 pm

Dutchy wrote:Good result for the bays, thanks Sturt


And Norwood as well.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby Dog-boy » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:13 pm

The problem is teams seem to have issues backing up after beating the Dogs.
Time will tell!!
Dog-boy
Member
 
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:17 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby blues2002 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:13 pm

topsywaldron wrote:And Norwood as well.


You're welcome too.

Now if you can all go and beat Westies for us, that would be nice.
User avatar
blues2002
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:14 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 6 times
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby blues2002 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:15 pm

Dog-boy wrote:The problem is teams seem to have issues backing up after beating the Dogs.
Time will tell!!


North will be favourites against the Blues next week for that very reason.
User avatar
blues2002
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:14 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 6 times
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby cennals05 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:21 pm

topsywaldron wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Good result for the bays, thanks Sturt


And Norwood as well.


No coincidence that both teams play on small grounds? Centrals don't play Norwood or Unley well.

Looking forward to next week.

Good to see Evil in the crowd. Looking fitter than when he played. Hopefully see him in some capacity before the end of the season.
cennals05
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:43 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 146 times
Been liked: 248 times

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby blues2002 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:26 pm

Wow, looking at Round 23, what a perfect set of matchups:

Central District v Glenelg (Elizabeth)
Most likely be the battle for top spot. Hard hitout pre finals, deserves an 8000+ crowd.

Norwood v West Adelaide (Norwood)
Eagles v Sturt (Woodville)
All four teams playing to finish anywhere from 3rd to 7th.

Port Magpies v North Adelaide (Alberton)
Maybe one of these teams will have a mathematical chance to make the finals. I'd consider going just to see devilsadvocate get angry about being robbed again by that cheating umpire they had today (I hope he gets the job for this rematch).
User avatar
blues2002
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:14 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 6 times
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby cennals05 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:30 pm

blues2002 wrote:Wow, looking at Round 23, what a perfect set of matchups:

Central District v Glenelg (Elizabeth)
Most likely be the battle for top spot. Hard hitout pre finals, deserves an 8000+ crowd.

Norwood v West Adelaide (Norwood)
Eagles v Sturt (Woodville)
All four teams playing to finish anywhere from 3rd to 7th.

Port Magpies v North Adelaide (Alberton)
Maybe one of these teams will have a mathematical chance to make the finals. I'd consider going just to see devilsadvocate get angry about being robbed again by that cheating umpire they had today (I hope he gets the job for this rematch).


I'm hoping we finish 2nd, to really get the psychological advantage over Glenelg.
cennals05
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:43 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 146 times
Been liked: 248 times

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby CUTTERMAN » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:39 pm

Great game, thought it was umpired reasonably well, skills were lacking, lots of turnovers and bad disposal by foot. The amount of time Centrals kicked along the ground, as in worm burners, not sure what was going on. Thought it was a good move with Hinge in defence, he had a good game. Sturt still are lacking with forward crumbers and it's been our problem for many years.
Attendance was disappointing but well behaved apart from a few wankers after the game infront of the McKay stand on both sides.
End result- Sturt live another week and Doggies roll on.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby Dutchy » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:42 pm

cennals05 wrote:
blues2002 wrote:Wow, looking at Round 23, what a perfect set of matchups:

Central District v Glenelg (Elizabeth)
Most likely be the battle for top spot. Hard hitout pre finals, deserves an 8000+ crowd.

Norwood v West Adelaide (Norwood)
Eagles v Sturt (Woodville)
All four teams playing to finish anywhere from 3rd to 7th.

Port Magpies v North Adelaide (Alberton)
Maybe one of these teams will have a mathematical chance to make the finals. I'd consider going just to see devilsadvocate get angry about being robbed again by that cheating umpire they had today (I hope he gets the job for this rematch).


I'm hoping we finish 2nd, to really get the psychological advantage over Glenelg.


Do that and theres a chance you wont play us!
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45967
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2579 times
Been liked: 4197 times

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby Mr Irate » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:56 pm

CUTTERMAN wrote:Great game, thought it was umpired reasonably well, skills were lacking, lots of turnovers and bad disposal by foot. The amount of time Centrals kicked along the ground, as in worm burners, not sure what was going on. Thought it was a good move with Hinge in defence, he had a good game. Sturt still are lacking with forward crumbers and it's been our problem for many years.
Attendance was disappointing but well behaved apart from a few wankers after the game infront of the McKay stand on both sides.
End result- Sturt live another week and Doggies roll on.


How much does it cost to put up that temporary fence ? Would the punters who actually paid at the gate covered the cost ?
"This windfall from the Adelaide Oval decision cannot be turned into a moment when the SANFL sells off the farm to underwrite its lazy league clubs."
User avatar
Mr Irate
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 843
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 12:54 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby CUTTERMAN » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:02 pm

Mr Irate wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:Great game, thought it was umpired reasonably well, skills were lacking, lots of turnovers and bad disposal by foot. The amount of time Centrals kicked along the ground, as in worm burners, not sure what was going on. Thought it was a good move with Hinge in defence, he had a good game. Sturt still are lacking with forward crumbers and it's been our problem for many years.
Attendance was disappointing but well behaved apart from a few wankers after the game infront of the McKay stand on both sides.
End result- Sturt live another week and Doggies roll on.


How much does it cost to put up that temporary fence ? Would the punters who actually paid at the gate covered the cost ?

Not sure what the break even costs are, but it costs us about $2000-$3000 more per game than any other club to host a home game.
Makes you wonder why port magpies are in the shit they are!!!!!!!!!!
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby EasyE » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:07 pm

Awesome that 95% of the scoring today was at the end where no one can get near. Couldn't tell what happened for most of the game as i wasn't carrying a telescope. Steak sandwich was a lot better than what ive had in the past there.
User avatar
EasyE
Member
 
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:17 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby Mr Irate » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:12 pm

CUTTERMAN wrote:
Mr Irate wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:Great game, thought it was umpired reasonably well, skills were lacking, lots of turnovers and bad disposal by foot. The amount of time Centrals kicked along the ground, as in worm burners, not sure what was going on. Thought it was a good move with Hinge in defence, he had a good game. Sturt still are lacking with forward crumbers and it's been our problem for many years.
Attendance was disappointing but well behaved apart from a few wankers after the game infront of the McKay stand on both sides.
End result- Sturt live another week and Doggies roll on.


How much does it cost to put up that temporary fence ? Would the punters who actually paid at the gate covered the cost ?

Not sure what the break even costs are, but it costs us about $2000-$3000 more per game than any other club to host a home game.
Makes you wonder why port magpies are in the **** they are!!!!!!!!!!


Would be an interesting exercise to see how many turn up without a fence.......and how much they would spend on food/drinks etc...
"This windfall from the Adelaide Oval decision cannot be turned into a moment when the SANFL sells off the farm to underwrite its lazy league clubs."
User avatar
Mr Irate
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 843
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 12:54 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby on the rails » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:12 pm

blues2002 wrote: Port Magpies v North Adelaide (Alberton)
Maybe one of these teams will have a mathematical chance to make the finals. I'd consider going just to see devilsadvocate get angry about being robbed again by that cheating umpire they had today (I hope he gets the job for this rematch).


You have to be joking if you think either will make the 5. As it is North are 3 games ahead of Port at present and have no chance themselves!
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby CUTTERMAN » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:25 pm

EasyE wrote:Awesome that 95% of the scoring today was at the end where no one can get near. Couldn't tell what happened for most of the game as i wasn't carrying a telescope. Steak sandwich was a lot better than what ive had in the past there.

You idiot! Unley is one of the small grounds in the SANFL and you're complaining that you need a telescope to see the other end of the ground, what happens when the ball is down theother end to you at Flea Park? get a life.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: RD16 - Sturt v Central Match Review

Postby fish » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:39 pm

stampy wrote:well done sturt, got to hand it to them, they seem to have the game plan to knock those doggies off regularly, wish the bays had their secret!

Except for in finals of course. 8)
User avatar
fish
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:28 pm
Has liked: 190 times
Been liked: 48 times

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |