THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

All discussions to do with the SANFL

THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby CENTURION » Sun May 23, 2010 9:42 pm

There seems to be a lot more unrest with the performances of the umpires lately. I mentioned something on another thread last week & I would like some serious (yes me, serious) discussion about my opinion on how to increase the performances of the umps. I said that in my opinion, there should be 2 field umps, 1 does the left, the other the right & there should be 4 boundary umps, 2 go to the left, 2 to the right. The boundary umps are to have more power to over-ride the field umps decisions, or assist in the decision making, like linesmen. Your thoughts?
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby bayman » Sun May 23, 2010 9:50 pm

i think the depth of umpires is at low point & not up to the standard, therefore they should revert to 2 umpires at least for the time being
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby Dog_ger » Sun May 23, 2010 9:54 pm

Where would we be without "Umpires"

Our universe would not be possible....

Without gravity we could not play ball sports.

Without Umpires we could not play our great game.

Full Stop

:partyman: :drinkers:
Smile :)

It's only Money $$$ :)

What is happening to our SANFL guys...
User avatar
Dog_ger
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
Location: Salisbury Downs
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 19 times

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby FlyingHigh » Sun May 23, 2010 9:55 pm

Alternatively go to four umpires who are all ex league players. Guess the problem with this is it takes out the participation of a certain group of footy enthusiasts.
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4907
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby PhilH » Sun May 23, 2010 10:05 pm

Confession Time ... I have now joined the umpiring ranks :shock:

Thankfully it's only goal umpire for the Happy Valley U8's but this still posses some unique challenges.

My son was in just his 3rd game today and when in the forward third he is usually the link man from the half forward flank to a player in the goal square.

Of course as soon I'm there he moves to full foward ... takes a mark and lines up for a shot, 10-15m out 45 degree angle.

I can't honestly say what I would have does if there was a close call to make but alas (or thankfully) he missed pretty clearly for a behind.
User avatar
PhilH
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:04 am
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 163 times
Grassroots Team: Happy Valley

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby Dog_ger » Sun May 23, 2010 10:18 pm

FlyingHigh wrote:Alternatively go to four umpires who are all ex league players. Guess the problem with this is it takes out the participation of a certain group of footy enthusiasts.


If we had 36 umpires we would still complain.

We tend to look for an excuse.

It's not the umpires. It's your team. ;) :D

Crows are Carp. It is not the umpires fault. :D

It's the team. ;)
Smile :)

It's only Money $$$ :)

What is happening to our SANFL guys...
User avatar
Dog_ger
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
Location: Salisbury Downs
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 19 times

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby G » Sun May 23, 2010 10:23 pm

I can just imagine some trumped up boundary umpire delighting in going to great lengths to over-ride a field umpires decision and make a name for himself :oops: :oops:
G
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:34 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby Dutchy » Sun May 23, 2010 10:28 pm

Name a year when we havent complained about umpiring?

FWIW I think giving the boundary umpires some responsibility does have merit for the obvious free kicks that the field umpire cannot see e.g. a throw, mark that hit the ground

Many other major sports allow their linesmen to make make decisions.

Makes sense
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45963
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2576 times
Been liked: 4191 times

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby topcat10 » Sun May 23, 2010 10:39 pm

I agree,especially after seeing field umpires spend half of a game looking into the sun by officiating from the centre of the ground, and some distance from the play. Stands to reason that both sides of the play are covered if the boundary umpire stays boundaryside while the field ump is in the middle.
topcat10
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:34 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby whufc » Sun May 23, 2010 10:43 pm

topcat10 wrote:I agree,especially after seeing field umpires spend half of a game looking into the sun by officiating from the centre of the ground, and some distance from the play. Stands to reason that both sides of the play are covered if the boundary umpire stays boundaryside while the field ump is in the middle.


yeah they did the same at Elizabeth, in the last quarter the sun was above the grandstand yet the umpires persisted in umpiring with there backs to the outer and looking at the members.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28553
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5907 times
Been liked: 2820 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby whufc » Sun May 23, 2010 10:45 pm

I think all these different rule changes/interpretations are making their job impossible.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28553
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5907 times
Been liked: 2820 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby scott » Sun May 23, 2010 10:52 pm

Leave the game alone! Bring back the rules of 10 years ago and stop changing everything cause that's what's stuffing everything up.

Boundary umpires making field umpire decisions?? That's not bloody football!!! They throw the ball in, the three men in white make the calls, the two mustache men in lab coats signal goals. Leave it like that. That's how we love it.

Let's just play footy and leave the game the f#ck alone!
User avatar
scott
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3760
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Noarlunga Oval
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby HeartBeatsTrue » Mon May 24, 2010 8:36 am

CENTURION wrote:There seems to be a lot more unrest with the performances of the umpires lately. I mentioned something on another thread last week & I would like some serious (yes me, serious) discussion about my opinion on how to increase the performances of the umps. I said that in my opinion, there should be 2 field umps, 1 does the left, the other the right & there should be 4 boundary umps, 2 go to the left, 2 to the right. The boundary umps are to have more power to over-ride the field umps decisions, or assist in the decision making, like linesmen. Your thoughts?
We already have 3 umpires making poor and inconsistant decisions, do we really need 6?
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:24 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Pooraka

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby twosheds » Mon May 24, 2010 8:59 am

scott wrote:Leave the game alone! Bring back the rules of 10 years ago and stop changing everything cause that's what's stuffing everything up.

Boundary umpires making field umpire decisions?? That's not bloody football!!! They throw the ball in, the three men in white make the calls, the two mustache men in lab coats signal goals. Leave it like that. That's how we love it.

Let's just play footy and leave the game the f#ck alone!


What he said !
Get your own Arts Show ya fairy !
User avatar
twosheds
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Back in Adelaide
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 18 times

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby CENTURION » Mon May 24, 2010 9:01 am

the game is faster & they see less, get one of the field, the boundary umps have more time to see things as well, because they don't have to worry about positioning themselves so much.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby LPH » Mon May 24, 2010 9:27 am

PhilH wrote:Confession Time ... I have now joined the umpiring ranks :shock:

Thankfully it's only goal umpire for the Happy Valley U8's but this still posses some unique challenges.

My son was in just his 3rd game today and when in the forward third he is usually the link man from the half forward flank to a player in the goal square.

Of course as soon I'm there he moves to full foward ... takes a mark and lines up for a shot, 10-15m out 45 degree angle.

I can't honestly say what I would have does if there was a close call to make but alas (or thankfully) he missed pretty clearly for a behind.


Me too !!!!
But FIELD & U12s @ GSFL (Full Oval) - Heart Attack is not far away!!

Oh, The Irony!
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:45 am
Location: Craven Cottage
Has liked: 541 times
Been liked: 326 times
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby CUTTERMAN » Mon May 24, 2010 9:30 am

I wonder just how much AFL umpiring and rules are being pushed onto the SANFL, it seems like alot more now to a few years ago, if this is so, does the SANFL umpiring fraternity detail these changes and interpretations to the clubs as the AFL do at the start of the season?
I also think some of the positioning of umpires is pretty bad and they feel compelled to make a decision regardless of a good view of the situation or not. There have been times when the boundary ump has had a clear vision and would be able to confer with the field ump. I think we have to stick with 3 field unless we can incorporate the boundary umps view, doesn't have to be all the time just occasionally. What happened to the days when the field ump would be on the boundary line facing the ruck contest during a throw in?
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby twosheds » Mon May 24, 2010 9:37 am

CENTURION wrote:the game is faster & they see less, get one of the field, the boundary umps have more time to see things as well, because they don't have to worry about positioning themselves so much.



"the game is faster" - this sounds like AFL media-speak for any perceived "issue' -how do they see less ?
Two field and four boundary umpires gives you six blokes with potential for disagreement, less consistency, six egos possibly looking to be massaged
If they postioned themselves correctly ( coaching issue) there is no "worry" about positioning
In a perfect world they would officiate in the spirit of the game rather than the letter of the law(s) but - never gonna happen !
Any way going to the footy and giving the umps a spray probably save the country millions of dollars in mental health funding, its a catharsis.
Get your own Arts Show ya fairy !
User avatar
twosheds
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Back in Adelaide
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 18 times

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby Wedgie » Mon May 24, 2010 9:59 am

twosheds wrote:
CENTURION wrote:the game is faster & they see less, get one of the field, the boundary umps have more time to see things as well, because they don't have to worry about positioning themselves so much.



"the game is faster" - this sounds like AFL media-speak for any perceived "issue' -how do they see less ?
Two field and four boundary umpires gives you six blokes with potential for disagreement, less consistency, six egos possibly looking to be massaged

Ive seen it trialled once and it resulted in more consistency and was the best display of SANFL umpiring Ive seen in the last 10 years. It results in more consistency as a person who can actually see what's happened can have input into just about every decision as opposed to the constant guessing there usually is in a game.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: THE BLOODY UMPIRES.

Postby MightyEagles » Mon May 24, 2010 10:33 am

I think that the SANFL umpires watch to much AFL and try and copy what those umpires.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |