Page 1 of 1
Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 6:02 pm
by scott
All updated:

Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 6:08 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
eagles won ressies by about 5-6 goals but dunno exact scores
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 6:09 pm
by sapaul
Some reserves scores on page 1 of the live scores thread today

Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 6:12 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
Final Ressies Score
Sturt 14.13.97
Port 15.6.96
just cut ans pasting from the live scores thread that SAPAUL alluded too.
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 6:12 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
final score reserves: North 14.13 West 7.6.
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 6:14 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
thanks to those posting the ressies scores
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 6:15 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
the top 4 all won, so no upsets, ressies that is
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 6:32 pm
by bulldogproud2
An interesting stat from the table is that Central have only won 57% of quarters. Can't wait for the boys to finally put four quarters together!
Cheers
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 6:36 pm
by scott
Updated to include all U/18 matches. Thanks for posting those scores above guys for the ressies but I cant update it until I have a bit more detailed info which I'll get shortly.
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 6:41 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
scott wrote:Updated to include all U/18 matches. Thanks for posting those scores above guys for the ressies but I cant update it until I have a bit more detailed info which I'll get shortly.
yeah you need the full details, just thought it was interesting to look as the ressies definately get overlooked
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 8:54 pm
by spell_check
I think you'll find the ladder doesn't include our League points for and against this week. (funnily enough neither does the SANFL website on the front page - more copy and paste jobs on the part of the SANFL?) The 2nd and 3rd placings should look like:
Eagles 803 for 722 against 52.66%
Glenelg 746 for 671 against 52.65%
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 10:31 pm
by Mr Irate
Central F & A also needs updating
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 10:33 pm
by Squawk
Thanks for posting these ladders each week - very informative analysis is provided within them Scott.
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 10:54 pm
by spell_check
Squawk wrote:Thanks for posting these ladders each week - very informative analysis is provided within them Scott.
I second that.

Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sat May 22, 2010 11:02 pm
by Columbo
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:eagles won ressies by about 5-6 goals but dunno exact scores
Were 5 goals up after 7 minutes of the 1st and were up 9.1 to 1.2 at 1/4 tm, Dogs slowly pegged the margin back after that to to get back to under 3 goals midway through the last.
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sun May 23, 2010 1:51 am
by scott
spell_check wrote:I think you'll find the ladder doesn't include our League points for and against this week. (funnily enough neither does the SANFL website on the front page - more copy and paste jobs on the part of the SANFL?) The 2nd and 3rd placings should look like:
Eagles 803 for 722 against 52.66%
Glenelg 746 for 671 against 52.65%
My bad, thanks spelly. For some reason the game score didn't update for both Eagles and Centrals but everything else did. I am sorry as I know detailed stats are only as useful as a car without petrol if they're not accurate. This won't happen again, I promise.

Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sun May 23, 2010 10:49 am
by MightyEagles
For those who care The Eagles def Central in the u18s.
Eagles 19.7.121
Central 4.12.36
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sun May 23, 2010 4:52 pm
by Booney
Port having the lowest average losing margin shows just how competitive the bottom placed ( for now ) team has been.
Re: Ladders after Rd 9

Posted:
Sun May 23, 2010 6:48 pm
by am Bays
Booney wrote:Port having the lowest average losing margin shows just how competitive the bottom placed ( for now ) team has been.
Not sure how long they will be bottom for Booney based one of the sides I saw yesterday....