by magpie in the 80's » Sat May 15, 2010 5:42 pm
by Jimmy » Sat May 15, 2010 5:43 pm
by csbowes » Sat May 15, 2010 6:51 pm
by NFC » Sat May 15, 2010 6:54 pm
csbowes wrote:The match certainly wasn't one for the archives. The first quarter saw Sturt explode out of the blocks with a couple of quick goals, but that's about as much free flowing football as you were going to see for the day. The Panthers then strangled Sturt out of its running game and the match became a real arm wrestle from then on with not much in the way of good football and a lot in the way of just scrappy, contested, close-in, scrambling scrums going one way or another.
For me, I thought South did a great job in keeping Sturt under pressure. This stopped the Blues from running free, as when they did get the ball away from the packs, they were able to run cleanly, mark up forward and score easy goals. But they were rare moments, in amongst constant too-ing and fro-ing from both sides as they battled from half-forward to half-back and back again. Sturt kicked away in the 3rd to about a 3 goal lead, the biggest lead for the game, but South reeled it in.
Likewise, Sturt kicked away in the last to a 3 goal lead and while South almost reeled it in, this time they couldn't. So the margin was probably a fair reflection of the difference between the two sides.
The most disappointing aspect of the game was the attrocious umpiring. When South had 7 majors on the board, 4 or more were from generally poor frees straight in front of goal. People can whine all they like about whether they were there or not, but I'd dispute some of them strongly. Rewarding players for ducking into tackles to get frees, sends the wrong message and certainly Joyce, an ex-South junior, enjoyed umpiring in the South forward line.
Enuff'said.
For me, glad we got the two points, but a long...... long..... long way to go.
For South fans, umpiring was no reflection on them, they were tough and hard, 100% improvement under Fuller.
by csbowes » Sat May 15, 2010 7:17 pm
NFC wrote:How was Aiden Riley on debut mate? Look alright?
by Cambridge Clarrie » Sat May 15, 2010 7:17 pm
by FlyingHigh » Sat May 15, 2010 8:46 pm
magpie in the 80's wrote:Final Score:
QxQ
Sturt 4.0 - 7.1 - 11.1 - 15.8 (98)
South 3.2 - 7.5 - 9.8 - 12.9 (81)
Reserves
Sturt 19.8.122
South 15.5.95
U/18's
Sturt 15.8.98
South 12.9.81
Really?
Crowd:
2622
by purch » Sat May 15, 2010 9:23 pm
by bosvit » Sat May 15, 2010 9:29 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:magpie in the 80's wrote:Final Score:
QxQ
Sturt 4.0 - 7.1 - 11.1 - 15.8 (98)
South 3.2 - 7.5 - 9.8 - 12.9 (81)
Reserves
Sturt 19.8.122
South 15.5.95
U/18's
Sturt 15.8.98
South 12.9.81
Really?
Crowd:
2622
by JAS » Sat May 15, 2010 9:34 pm
by prowling panther » Sat May 15, 2010 9:47 pm
purch wrote:Well I'm happy for the 2 points, but once again not happy about the way our game is going.
I've had a rubbish week in jury serviceI am in a letter/speech writing mood. Can someone please give me (and other SANFL supporters) the proper lines to get in contact with Shane Harris? It's now past the time when we should let out feelings known.
Thanks in advance.
by CUTTERMAN » Sat May 15, 2010 10:41 pm
purch wrote:Well I'm happy for the 2 points, but once again not happy about the way our game is going.
I've had a rubbish week in jury serviceI am in a letter/speech writing mood. Can someone please give me (and other SANFL supporters) the proper lines to get in contact with Shane Harris? It's now past the time when we should let out feelings known.
Thanks in advance.
by godoubleblues » Sat May 15, 2010 10:49 pm
Jimmy wrote:
umps got a serve as they left the ground.
by purch » Sun May 16, 2010 12:58 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:From what I heard today, 3rd hand from one of your own officials is that there has been a " Chambo Rule" implemented regarding 25's.
by southee » Sun May 16, 2010 1:05 am
by smithy » Sun May 16, 2010 1:07 am
southee wrote:So Sturt supporters did not see the last 1/4 of football ????
Im sure that would have evened the frees for and against up a bit
by purch » Sun May 16, 2010 1:09 am
southee wrote:So Sturt supporters did not see the last 1/4 of football ????
Im sure that would have evened the frees for and against up a bit
by klaan » Sun May 16, 2010 1:15 am
purch wrote:Well I'm happy for the 2 points, but once again not happy about the way our game is going.
I've had a rubbish week in jury serviceI am in a letter/speech writing mood. Can someone please give me (and other SANFL supporters) the proper lines to get in contact with Shane Harris? It's now past the time when we should let out feelings known.
Thanks in advance.
by purch » Sun May 16, 2010 1:18 am
klaan wrote:purch wrote:Well I'm happy for the 2 points, but once again not happy about the way our game is going.
I've had a rubbish week in jury serviceI am in a letter/speech writing mood. Can someone please give me (and other SANFL supporters) the proper lines to get in contact with Shane Harris? It's now past the time when we should let out feelings known.
Thanks in advance.
Reckon its shaneh@sanfl.com.au!
by southee » Sun May 16, 2010 1:25 am
purch wrote:southee wrote:So Sturt supporters did not see the last 1/4 of football ????
Im sure that would have evened the frees for and against up a bit
Agreed we got the best of it in the last 1/4 southee. That is not the point. The umpiring was woeful from start to finish, and the free kick count was almost double to South at the end of the day still. And IF what cutterman's informant said is true then it is bad for all of us.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |