Page 1 of 1
Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Fri May 14, 2010 11:29 pm
by Dutchy
Final Score
West 13.10.88
Port 11.9.75
Goal Kickers:
West: Ferguson, Bennett 3, N. Caruso 2, Ezard 2, Willits, Ben Fisher, Beech ea 1
Port: Cloke, Summerton, Solly 2, Harder, Rose, Milera, Meiklejohn, Madden ea 1
Best Players:
West: Ferguson, Caire, Birss, Fielke, Ezard, Bennett
Port: Clayton, Thurgood, Carr, Miller, Summerton, Gray
QxQ
West 7.3 10.5 11.9 13.10.88
Port 2.2 3.6 7.7 11.9.75
Reserves:
West: 7.6.48
Port: 11.10.76
U/18's
West 10.11.71
Port 17.10.112
Crowd:
3583
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Fri May 14, 2010 11:33 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
A few weeks back, West were well on top of Norwood in general field play (especially in midfield), but somehow only won by about 3 goals, aided by a last quarter fade out. Was that the case tonight? If so, is it fitness?
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Fri May 14, 2010 11:45 pm
by bayman
while port were as brave & resilient as ever west was never ever going to lose & i think the fact that west had 1 left on the bench helped port a bit, poor old chubby sprinted to do a sheperd in front of the benches & 'twang' the hamstring went so he'll be missed for a few weeks, i thought ferguson was outstanding especially early & i think he looks more dangerous a forward than willets does so perhaps willets could go to chb with ferguson to a more permanent chf, caruso (n), ezard & bennett for his 3 goals were the better players for west while for port it was the usual cloke, kirkwood, i also like the look of rose, solly, milera & mcinerney as future great players for them, i also think clinch has improved from last year........i just wish the siren went 4 seconds earlier
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 12:08 am
by mal
Another honourable defeat by PA
Imagine what might happen if they get off to a good first qtr start
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 12:32 am
by mighty_tiger_79
port havent won a 1st 1/4 this season, cant afford to give away such big starts as they did tonight
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 12:46 am
by goraw
good win for west , im whacking $500 on west for the premiership next year, as soon as the market comes up! will be decent odds and experienced at winning.get on em next year!!
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 1:15 am
by GWW
Anyone know how serious Webb's injury is? Will he be out for the rest of the season?
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 8:44 am
by scott
Despite the fade out, it'd be a happy time at Westies overall - third in both the league and reserves.

Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 8:48 am
by Big Phil
Great to see West Adelaide get the 3,000+ they needed last night to better there total home crowd figure for last season, only into Round this year.
Last night there was 3,583 people, which is what most estimated on the night...
Great stuff Westies, night footy a winner !!
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 9:09 am
by bayman
GWW wrote:Anyone know how serious Webb's injury is? Will he be out for the rest of the season?
don't know about webb sorry but chubb pulled a hamstring (right leg) so he'll be out for 3-5 weeks
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 9:34 am
by nickname
Adelaide Hawk wrote:A few weeks back, West were well on top of Norwood in general field play (especially in midfield), but somehow only won by about 3 goals, aided by a last quarter fade out. Was that the case tonight? If so, is it fitness?
I wouldn't think it's fitness AH; we came home hard against the Dogs out at Elizabeth in the last quarter, and against the Eagles in the last quarter. I suspect it's more mental - over the last few years we haven't had much experience at being 7 goals up during a game.
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 10:07 am
by bloods08
I think it is more to do with being forced into having limited rotations late in a game.
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 8:48 pm
by Macca19
So the league and U18s score was exactly the same? Wouldnt have happened too many times I wouldnt think (with league and one of the other leagues).
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 9:19 pm
by Hopeful Jelly
Macca19 wrote:So the league and U18s score was exactly the same? Wouldnt have happened too many times I wouldnt think (with league and one of the other leagues).
And Port only 1 point away from kicking the same score in league, reserves and U18s.
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 9:40 pm
by JAS
Hopeful Jelly wrote:Macca19 wrote:So the league and U18s score was exactly the same? Wouldnt have happened too many times I wouldnt think (with league and one of the other leagues).
And Port only 1 point away from kicking the same score in league, reserves and U18s.
The U18's result as listed on the SANFL website...
http://www.sanfl.com.au/maccas_cup/u18_results/West Adelaide 10.11-71
def. by
Port Adelaide Magpies 17.10-112
Regards
JAS
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 9:46 pm
by bosvit
Thanks JAS looks like a few posters are suffering from CODS
CODS is not necessarily a male condition as it stands for Co-Ordination Deficiency Syndrome....
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 9:49 pm
by JAS
bosvit wrote:Thanks JAS looks like a few posters are suffering from CODS
CODS is not necessarily a male condition as it stands for Co-Ordination Deficiency Syndrome....

I'll bet it is...like reading instructions or asking for directions
You're welcome...although there's no guarantee that the SANFL figures are right either lol
Regards
JAS
Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sat May 15, 2010 10:44 pm
by Hopeful Jelly
bosvit wrote:Thanks JAS looks like a few posters are suffering from CODS
CODS is not necessarily a male condition as it stands for Co-Ordination Deficiency Syndrome....
Sorry, I, and I assume Macca, were just commenting based on the scores provided at the start of the thread - next time I'll make sure I go to the game before making such an ill-informed comment.

Anyway, shouldn't the condition you speak about be named CDS as 'coordination' is a single word and not hyphenated? Perhaps a deficiency in coordination of syllables?

Re: Round 8 - West v Port @ Richmond Review Thread

Posted:
Sun May 16, 2010 11:36 am
by beenreal
Great night under lights at Richmond.
Another "Plucky" effort by the Magpies but they just keep shooting themselves in the foot with the slow starts and poor conversion in front of goal.
With some bigger bodies in Kory Beard, Daniel Stanley and a tall J Butcher due to play within a couple of weeks, there's plenty to look forward to.