Page 1 of 2

Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:28 pm
by MagareyLegend
Norwood coach Nathan Bassett has been fined $800 by the SANFL Tribunal for using abusive language to an umpire, during the match against the Panthers on Thursday night at the Parade.

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:34 pm
by Barto
They probably deserved a spray.

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:09 am
by Peter Griffen
Probably money well spent!

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:07 am
by Adelaide Hawk
Well, it has cost Bassett $800 to learn what some of us already knew. It's pointless giving an umpire a spray, they don't listen anyway.

Whereas it's comforting to know our coach is passionate about his job, he can't allow his emotions to dictate to his actions during the game.

We are in for more frustrating moments during 2010, so Bassett needs to buckle himself in for the ride, and forget about abusing umpires.

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 5:35 pm
by Bulldogga55
Hope the fine didnt blow the salary cap for this year?

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 5:50 pm
by Go Legs
Getting conflicting stories on the Bass Report, some say he gave the umpires a spray at 3/4 time, other say he gave them a spray as they left the ground after the game. :shock:

Personally I give the a spray all the time :evil: and then some more

Cheers

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:18 pm
by hereselmo1
I'm surprised Bassett did that, he always seems so cool, calm and collected. Then again so am I when I am not on the sporting field, lol.

Umpires probably deserved the spray, Bassett probably deserved the fine.

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:48 am
by HeartBeatsTrue
Go Legs wrote:Getting conflicting stories on the Bass Report, some say he gave the umpires a spray at 3/4 time, other say he gave them a spray as they left the ground after the game. :shock:

Probably both!

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:38 am
by whufc
Probably doesn't set the best example, will be hard to drag a player off the ground if he gives away 25 meteres for mouthing off at an umpire hey.

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 10:58 am
by Dogwatcher
Can't drag him but the precedent has now been set at the Parade. Fine him $800 ;)
Put it in the footy trip funds.

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:43 am
by dedja
Reasonable amount of coin to put in the swear jar ...

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:45 am
by whufc
dedja wrote:Reasonable amount of coin to put in the swear jar ...


Not a problem at Norwood we all know how many millions there players are on hence the salary cap breach.

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 1:09 pm
by Go Legs
whufc wrote:
dedja wrote:Reasonable amount of coin to put in the swear jar ...


Not a problem at Norwood we all know how many millions there players are on hence the salary cap breach.


Don't throw stones in glass houses ;)

Cheers

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:18 pm
by mal
I would get frustrated if I coached NW on Friday night as well
IF
2-3 players who could not come back on the ground after 1/2 time
A delegation of an AFL club monitoring a certain player who was only allowed a 69er playing time
4 players overseas when the club needs all hands on deck
And to concede a 4 goal start to the perennial wooden spoon dwellars of this decade[and be equal at 3/4 time and lose by end, pending on when Nath swore]

Yeah I would be

_________________
Please note this post is not meant to be a derogative cheap sniggering of South Adelaides lack of recent success
Also if anything I have posted about the NW football club is incorrect I apologise

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:03 pm
by westcoastpanther
mal wrote:And to concede a 4 goal start to the perennial wooden spoon dwellars of this decade


Best get your facts right mal.

2000 - Glenelg
2001 - Glenelg
2002 - Glenelg
2003 - North
2004 - Norwood
2005 - West
2006 - West
2007 - West
2008 - West
2009 - South

In fact since 1991 and the intro of a nine team comp South have only won two spoons, 97 & 09

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:39 pm
by Wedgie
He's got ya there mal!

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:50 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
And the fact none of the reasons given was the umpires fault.

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 4:57 pm
by The Yetti
westcoastpanther wrote:
mal wrote:And to concede a 4 goal start to the perennial wooden spoon dwellars of this decade


Best get your facts right mal.

2000 - Glenelg
2001 - Glenelg
2002 - Glenelg
2003 - North
2004 - Norwood
2005 - West
2006 - West
2007 - West
2008 - West
2009 - South

In fact since 1991 and the intro of a nine team comp South have only won two spoons, 97 & 09





Not too sure if a team WINS a wooden spoon

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:21 pm
by westcoastpanther
The Yetti wrote:
westcoastpanther wrote:
mal wrote:And to concede a 4 goal start to the perennial wooden spoon dwellars of this decade


Best get your facts right mal.

2000 - Glenelg
2001 - Glenelg
2002 - Glenelg
2003 - North
2004 - Norwood
2005 - West
2006 - West
2007 - West
2008 - West
2009 - South

In fact since 1991 and the intro of a nine team comp South have only won two spoons, 97 & 09





Not too sure if a team WINS a wooden spoon


Not sure if you need the extra o in to either, guess your lucky I'm not an anal pedantic!! :roll:

Re: Bassett Decision

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:22 pm
by mal
mal wrote:I would get frustrated if I coached NW on Friday night as well
IF
2-3 players who could not come back on the ground after 1/2 time
A delegation of an AFL club monitoring a certain player who was only allowed a 69er playing time
4 players overseas when the club needs all hands on deck
And to concede a 4 goal start to the MOSTLY NEAR perennial wooden spoon dwellars of this decade, AND THE 2009 WOODEN SPOONERS[and be equal at 3/4 time and lose by end, pending on when Nath swore]

Yeah I would be

_________________
Please note this post is not meant to be a derogative cheap sniggering of South Adelaides lack of recent success
Also if anything I have posted about the NW football club is incorrect I apologise


Please note anything typed on CAPITALS on the above quote, and incorrect I apologise ...