by Sojourner » Wed Feb 10, 2010 7:49 pm
by pipers » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:00 pm
Sojourner wrote:It is a setback for the PAFC, yet its not by any means the final round yet for the club despite the dire predictions that have been made in the media.
by JK » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:02 pm
pipers wrote:Sojourner wrote:It is a setback for the PAFC, yet its not by any means the final round yet for the club despite the dire predictions that have been made in the media.
It is not a set-back at all. It is exactly the kick up the arse that we need to wake up to the fact that we don't actually have a god-given right to exist simply because we are Port Adelaide.
Now is the time to mobilise the latent supported base. Any attempts to do it prior to today's ruling were destined to fail as they would have received no support from the club as those in charge had been conned by the best bit of spin since Old Trafford in 1993.
I signed up today with my usual Portonian package, and one for my son. So did 230+ others.
Presumably those 230 didn't want to see their hard-earned going to the bastard-spawn either.
by rod_rooster » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:07 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:pipers wrote:Sojourner wrote:It is a setback for the PAFC, yet its not by any means the final round yet for the club despite the dire predictions that have been made in the media.
It is not a set-back at all. It is exactly the kick up the arse that we need to wake up to the fact that we don't actually have a god-given right to exist simply because we are Port Adelaide.
Now is the time to mobilise the latent supported base. Any attempts to do it prior to today's ruling were destined to fail as they would have received no support from the club as those in charge had been conned by the best bit of spin since Old Trafford in 1993.
I signed up today with my usual Portonian package, and one for my son. So did 230+ others.
Presumably those 230 didn't want to see their hard-earned going to the bastard-spawn either.
What a super SUPER post mate, congratulations.
As I posted somewhere else, Port have lost a few battles over the years but they've never lost a war ... IT won't be easy but worthwhile things never are and Im very confident your mob can get through this.
Congrats again on your outlook mate!
by Wedgie » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:08 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by am Bays » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:09 pm
by spell_check » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:29 pm
pipers wrote:Sojourner wrote:It is a setback for the PAFC, yet its not by any means the final round yet for the club despite the dire predictions that have been made in the media.
It is not a set-back at all. It is exactly the kick up the arse that we need to wake up to the fact that we don't actually have a god-given right to exist simply because we are Port Adelaide.
Now is the time to mobilise the latent supported base. Any attempts to do it prior to today's ruling were destined to fail as they would have received no support from the club as those in charge had been conned by the best bit of spin since Old Trafford in 1993.
I signed up today with my usual Portonian package, and one for my son. So did 230+ others.
Presumably those 230 didn't want to see their hard-earned going to the bastard-spawn either.
by eddie eagle » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:47 pm
pipers wrote:Sojourner wrote:It is a setback for the PAFC, yet its not by any means the final round yet for the club despite the dire predictions that have been made in the media.
It is not a set-back at all. It is exactly the kick up the arse that we need to wake up to the fact that we don't actually have a god-given right to exist simply because we are Port Adelaide.
Now is the time to mobilise the latent supported base. Any attempts to do it prior to today's ruling were destined to fail as they would have received no support from the club as those in charge had been conned by the best bit of spin since Old Trafford in 1993.
I signed up today with my usual Portonian package, and one for my son. So did 230+ others.
Presumably those 230 didn't want to see their hard-earned going to the bastard-spawn either.
by am Bays » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:10 pm
eddie eagle wrote:
That is cruel for your son. I emailed the club today asking about their two year membership package for $88. I asked if I sign up for two years 2010 & 2011 and worst case that they do not compete in 2011, do I get my money back or do I must I join the line up of unsecured creditors hoping for perhaps 35 cents in the dollar back?
Awaiting a reply
by goraw » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:22 pm
eddie eagle wrote:pipers wrote:Sojourner wrote:It is a setback for the PAFC, yet its not by any means the final round yet for the club despite the dire predictions that have been made in the media.
It is not a set-back at all. It is exactly the kick up the arse that we need to wake up to the fact that we don't actually have a god-given right to exist simply because we are Port Adelaide.
Now is the time to mobilise the latent supported base. Any attempts to do it prior to today's ruling were destined to fail as they would have received no support from the club as those in charge had been conned by the best bit of spin since Old Trafford in 1993.
I signed up today with my usual Portonian package, and one for my son. So did 230+ others.
Presumably those 230 didn't want to see their hard-earned going to the bastard-spawn either.
That is cruel for your son. I emailed the club today asking about their two year membership package for $88. I asked if I sign up for two years 2010 & 2011 and worst case that they do not compete in 2011, do I get my money back or do I must I join the line up of unsecured creditors hoping for perhaps 35 cents in the dollar back?
Awaiting a reply
by Barto » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:25 pm
by The Apostle » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:26 pm
eddie eagle wrote:That is cruel for your son. I emailed the club today asking about their two year membership package for $88. I asked if I sign up for two years 2010 & 2011 and worst case that they do not compete in 2011, do I get my money back or do I must I join the line up of unsecured creditors hoping for perhaps 35 cents in the dollar back?
Awaiting a reply
by pipers » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:35 pm
by devilsadvocate » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:57 pm
eddie eagle wrote:That is cruel for your son. I emailed the club today asking about their two year membership package for $88. I asked if I sign up for two years 2010 & 2011 and worst case that they do not compete in 2011, do I get my money back or do I must I join the line up of unsecured creditors hoping for perhaps 35 cents in the dollar back?
Awaiting a reply
by devilsadvocate » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:01 pm
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:26 am
by Barto » Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:18 am
by Macca19 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:07 am
by on the rails » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:16 am
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:" If we lose the Port Adelaide Magpies we might as well put a closed sign on all of Port Adelaide - tourism, business, you name it."
by TimmiesChin » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:26 am
Barto wrote:Despite their assertion that the rest of the league wants them gone out of spite, it is just not true.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |