Page 1 of 6
A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:21 pm
by Dog_ger
An 8 team competition.
Sitting back, it looks like the early stages of the SANFL disappearing altogether.
What next, a 7 team comp....?
I hope we all learnt from losing West Torrens.
If we had our time over, would we have allowed an Eagles merger between 2 great clubs.
Entering the AFL, took away more than we can imaging but I think it was neccessary...

Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:32 pm
by Barto
Draw a line in the sand and sign a heads of agreement to make sure no one else goes to the wall. I think we're fine because the clubs seem to be generating their own incomes at the moment. Even Norwood who were struggling are talking new facilities at the Parade.
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:01 pm
by Wedgie
8 or 10 team comp would be much better for all involved, no bye means a much better SANFL IMHO.
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:03 pm
by Psyber
I think 8 teams is more viable than 9 or 10.
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:37 pm
by Brucetiki
if/when the SANFL comp becomes an 8 team comp, how many rounds should we play?
Best option IMO would be 21 rounds (play each team 3 times with 2 split rounds making a 23 week minor round). M
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:41 pm
by Mickyj
Brucetiki wrote:if/when the SANFL comp becomes an 8 team comp, how many rounds should we play?
Best option IMO would be 21 rounds (play each team 3 times with 2 split rounds making a 23 week minor round). M
Sounds good me lets start it in 2010

Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:49 pm
by woodwt
no more bye cool
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:59 pm
by gadj1976
That's my concern with letting Port disappear. What next - when some other club can't subsidising itself with Pokies, they have to either merge or leave as well? The SANFL should be doing everything in it's power (pun) to ensure that the clubs stay afloat. Without the clubs, the SANFL dies too.
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:06 pm
by Mickyj
gadj1976 wrote:That's my concern with letting Port disappear. What next - when some other club can't subsidising itself with Pokies, they have to either merge or leave as well? The SANFL should be doing everything in it's power (pun) to ensure that the clubs stay afloat. Without the clubs, the SANFL dies too.
And sturt got how much as a handout from the SANFL when they were struggling !
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:10 pm
by Apachebulldog
Too much paranoia i reckon if the merger does not go ahead some one will bail them out, you cannot let one of the original footy clubs in this state disappear, however 90% of their supporters jumped on the Power bandwagon and have not looked back since to see whats happening at the real Magpies. Tho i am surprised at the apathy from most of their supporters in this crisis you think by now hundreds of ex Maggy players who are well off and business people who love this club would of all chipped in by now ???? I guess when you have got two split camps it would be very tough.
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:11 pm
by Booney
Wedgie wrote:8 or 10 team comp would be much better for all involved, no bye means a much better SANFL IMHO.
A much better SANFL just because a bye is gone?
Is this really such a disruptive element to the SANFL season?
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:12 pm
by Wedgie
Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:8 or 10 team comp would be much better for all involved, no bye means a much better SANFL IMHO.
A much better SANFL just because a bye is gone?
Is this really such a disruptive element to the SANFL season?
Yes.
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:13 pm
by Booney
That explains it all then.

Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:14 pm
by gadj1976
Mickyj wrote:gadj1976 wrote:That's my concern with letting Port disappear. What next - when some other club can't subsidising itself with Pokies, they have to either merge or leave as well? The SANFL should be doing everything in it's power (pun) to ensure that the clubs stay afloat. Without the clubs, the SANFL dies too.
And sturt got how much as a handout from the SANFL when they were struggling !
That's my point. I've got NO problem with handouts to be honest - because the SANFL needs the history and tradition - that's what makes the competition it is.
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:16 pm
by Booney
gadj1976 wrote:Mickyj wrote:gadj1976 wrote:That's my concern with letting Port disappear. What next - when some other club can't subsidising itself with Pokies, they have to either merge or leave as well? The SANFL should be doing everything in it's power (pun) to ensure that the clubs stay afloat. Without the clubs, the SANFL dies too.
And sturt got how much as a handout from the SANFL when they were struggling !
That's my point. I've got NO problem with handouts to be honest - because the SANFL needs the history and tradition - that's what makes the competition it is.
That truy is revolutionary thinking guys. I applaud the way you're gone and thought outside the square.
Bravo...BRAVO!
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:22 pm
by Mr Irate
Booney wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Mickyj wrote:gadj1976 wrote:That's my concern with letting Port disappear. What next - when some other club can't subsidising itself with Pokies, they have to either merge or leave as well? The SANFL should be doing everything in it's power (pun) to ensure that the clubs stay afloat. Without the clubs, the SANFL dies too.
And sturt got how much as a handout from the SANFL when they were struggling !
That's my point. I've got NO problem with handouts to be honest - because the SANFL needs the history and tradition - that's what makes the competition it is.
That truy is revolutionary thinking guys. I applaud the way you're gone and thought outside the square.
Bravo...BRAVO!
Make the most of it Booney......in 9 minutes you may no longer be pertinent to this site

Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:26 pm
by redandblack
I hope he is.
I don't want to see any club have to fold.
I'd think a Plan B of some sort might be agreed to.
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:29 pm
by am Bays
Mr Irate wrote:Booney wrote:That truy is revolutionary thinking guys. I applaud the way you're gone and thought outside the square.
Bravo...BRAVO!
Make the most of it Booney......in 9 minutes you may no longer be pertinent to this site

Booney will always be pertinent to this site, maybe not so much on the SANFL page but on this yes.
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:30 pm
by gadj1976
Something else to remember is that reducing from 9 team to 8, we will lose more than 1/9th of the supporter base completely. I can't see any Port supporter suddenly barracking for any other side.
I don't exactly know the machinations behind it all, but the SANFL would be derelict to let this happen to one of their clubs.
Re: A SANFL without the Port Magpies.

Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:31 pm
by Mr Irate
am Bays wrote:Mr Irate wrote:Booney wrote:That truy is revolutionary thinking guys. I applaud the way you're gone and thought outside the square.
Bravo...BRAVO!
Make the most of it Booney......in 9 minutes you may no longer be pertinent to this site

Booney will always be pertinent to this site, maybe not so much on the SANFL page but on this yes.
Purely in jest my friend.....