by bayman » Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:06 pm
by bloods08 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:35 pm
bayman wrote:with the advent of two more franchise teams joining the afl, i feel (good luck to them if they are) that they are trying to buy a flag before the player drain occurs with the inclusion of those teams
by Dog-boy » Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:43 pm
bloods08 wrote:bayman wrote:with the advent of two more franchise teams joining the afl, i feel (good luck to them if they are) that they are trying to buy a flag before the player drain occurs with the inclusion of those teams
So what if they are. If they have the money, then good luck to them. Id be disappointed if my club wasnt trying to do the same thing.
by bayman » Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:47 pm
bloods08 wrote:bayman wrote:with the advent of two more franchise teams joining the afl, i feel (good luck to them if they are) that they are trying to buy a flag before the player drain occurs with the inclusion of those teams
So what if they are. If they have the money, then good luck to them. Id be disappointed if my club wasnt trying to do the same thing.
by am Bays » Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:53 pm
Dog-boy wrote:bloods08 wrote:bayman wrote:with the advent of two more franchise teams joining the afl, i feel (good luck to them if they are) that they are trying to buy a flag before the player drain occurs with the inclusion of those teams
So what if they are. If they have the money, then good luck to them. Id be disappointed if my club wasnt trying to do the same thing.
I agree every team should be doing there best to improve there squads.
by Adelaide Hawk » Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:54 pm
by Barto » Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:00 pm
bayman wrote:bloods08 wrote:bayman wrote:with the advent of two more franchise teams joining the afl, i feel (good luck to them if they are) that they are trying to buy a flag before the player drain occurs with the inclusion of those teams
So what if they are. If they have the money, then good luck to them. Id be disappointed if my club wasnt trying to do the same thing.
'so what' you ask....i'm just asking a question to stimulate discussion as it has been very boring on here recently as for the money if sturt do have the money why were some players made to wait for theirs later than some of the more high profile players ???
by am Bays » Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:05 pm
Barto wrote:bayman wrote:'so what' you ask....i'm just asking a question to stimulate discussion as it has been very boring on here recently as for the money if sturt do have the money why were some players made to wait for theirs later than some of the more high profile players ???
Still trotting this one out are we?
by Voice » Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:18 pm
bayman wrote:bloods08 wrote:bayman wrote:with the advent of two more franchise teams joining the afl, i feel (good luck to them if they are) that they are trying to buy a flag before the player drain occurs with the inclusion of those teams
So what if they are. If they have the money, then good luck to them. Id be disappointed if my club wasnt trying to do the same thing.
'so what' you ask....i'm just asking a question to stimulate discussion as it has been very boring on here recently as for the money if sturt do have the money why were some players made to wait for theirs later than some of the more high profile players ???
by Voice » Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:21 pm
by bayman » Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:22 pm
Voice wrote:bayman wrote:bloods08 wrote:bayman wrote:with the advent of two more franchise teams joining the afl, i feel (good luck to them if they are) that they are trying to buy a flag before the player drain occurs with the inclusion of those teams
So what if they are. If they have the money, then good luck to them. Id be disappointed if my club wasnt trying to do the same thing.
'so what' you ask....i'm just asking a question to stimulate discussion as it has been very boring on here recently as for the money if sturt do have the money why were some players made to wait for theirs later than some of the more high profile players ???
BBBWWWWHHHAAAAAAAAA! ROFLMAO! You have no idea, do you? Sour grapes perhaps. We've got money, people are being paid as they should and people want to play for us. No sitting on our hands saying 'We made the GF this year so we should be able to win it next year" ala your mob.
Go to Matt Benson with your accusations and see what happens to you.
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:30 pm
bayman wrote: if sturt do have the money why were some players made to wait for theirs later than some of the more high profile players ???
bayman wrote:& i'll add this was NOT POSTED TO HAVE A GO AT STURT in any way, it was posted to create a discussion which it has
by Voice » Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:34 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:bayman wrote: if sturt do have the money why were some players made to wait for theirs later than some of the more high profile players ???bayman wrote:& i'll add this was NOT POSTED TO HAVE A GO AT STURT in any way, it was posted to create a discussion which it has
by bayman » Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:41 pm
Voice wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:bayman wrote: if sturt do have the money why were some players made to wait for theirs later than some of the more high profile players ???bayman wrote:& i'll add this was NOT POSTED TO HAVE A GO AT STURT in any way, it was posted to create a discussion which it has
Thank you Sleeping Giant, I thought somone else would pick up on the irony![]()
by G » Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:53 pm
by Jimmy » Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:36 pm
by gossipgirl » Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:41 am
by Barto » Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:57 am
gossipgirl wrote:I believe you can buy them at cheap as chips for about $2
by Booney » Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:00 am
Barto wrote:gossipgirl wrote:I believe you can buy them at cheap as chips for about $2
Except for Glenelg of course, they'd trip over and it would fall out of their hands on the way to the check out
by am Bays » Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:03 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |