Page 1 of 16
		
			
				South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:47 pmby aceman
				Clay Sampson in trouble.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: Sampson gone
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:50 pmby dodgingandweaving
				Joking.
Have heard he struggled tactically on game day, but to sack him just sums up the club.
Was the heart and soul of the club, but it comes as no surprise. We're talking about South Adelaide here.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: Sampson gone
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:51 pmby LBT
				Strewth, I hope they have a really good replacement lined up.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:57 pmby dodgingandweaving
				Jeez, well done Hutchy!!!!!
Has gone from being sacked, to being in trouble. Tool.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:57 pmby Dirko
				Where did you here this ?
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:59 pmby dodgingandweaving
				WOW
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:04 pmby am Bays
				I find this very hard to believe as Clay apparently is one of the persons conducting the review of the football operations (with Sharpe and Kavanagh) at South.  Very hard for a hog to butcher itself....
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:05 pmby dodgingandweaving
				Biggest newsbreaker in footy - Craig 'Aceman' Hutchison
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:12 pmby darley16
				Rubbish rubbish and more rubbish. Aceman you must be bored, if you have facts post them, otherwise go back to work.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: Sampson gone
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:17 pmby bloods08
				LBT wrote:Strewth, I hope they have a really good replacement lined up.
Maybe John Cahill. 

 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:21 pmby bloods08
				Seriously though, sacking Clay Sampon is the worst thing they can do right now.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:29 pmby Wedgie
				Surely not.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:35 pmby wycbloods
				Wedgie wrote:Surely not.
Agreed.  The club will be in more trouble than the early settlers if true.
 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:37 pmby darley16
				Quote from SAFC membership letter dated 3/8/09,"The board, and indeed the playing group ,are united in their desire for Clay to continue to lead our club". 
                                     End of story.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:43 pmby tipper
				Hate to sya it but isnt a public declaration that the players\board etc are behind the coach usually the first step to getting rid of them? 
How many times has it happened that that sort of declaration is made and shortly after the coach "steps aside"? didnt Norwood make a similar statement shortly before Trevor Hill resigned?
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:03 pmby PhilH
				I can remember not too far back at an SANFL club, the acting chairman getting up at a home match lunch I attended on a Sunday after specifically requesting the opportunity to speak publically on behalf of the board to reiterate the board's support of that coach, explain why a review was being done and answer a few questions. Only 33 hours later that same board, so publically keen to state their support, voted to sack the coach.
Early the next afternoon a rumour appeared on this site stating the coach was sacked. I thought the rumour was totally and utterly ridiculous, it was only 2 days ago the board's acting chairman had publically got up to state their support. Well on that day I was proven most wrong.
I hope I am not wrong here, personally with all the bias involved you wish to throw my way, they need to stick with Clay and give him the support to make it work at the Panthers. From my understanding of the members letter that will be the focus of any changes that need to be made.  And thats the way it should be.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:05 pmby pale ale
				Sorry Darley, I thought it was all crap as well but after a couple of phone calls i believe its TRUE
Better have a good replacement thats all I'm saying.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:17 pmby Chambo100
				If they sent a letter to members 4 days ago which was after last week's poor game, offering him support in his position as coach, if they sack him now, they should all, everyone of them resign too.
How can you intentionally mislead your membership like that?
I would have no support for the board, if I was a member of that club.
The members, should then call a meeting for a vote of 'no confidence' in the board and call for a vote on a new one.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:31 pmby Barto
				Tim Ginever.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: South rumour
				
Posted: 
Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:32 pmby saintal
				Surely not?  
 
   
 Even the thought of another coach getting the boot makes me sick