Page 1 of 8

RD21 Sturt v Glenelg @ Unley Preview (Sun 23/8)

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:42 pm
by baysman
Bring forth your fruitful opinions on next weeks match !

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:59 pm
by dsriggs
Going by the numbers, the Tigers should get up here, although the week off will hurt a bit.

But surely the real match here is Mills vs Chambers. Can Chambo avenge his 1 goal loss from their last confrontation?? :lol:

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:09 pm
by Voice
dsriggs wrote:Going by the numbers, the Tigers should get up here, although the week off will hurt a bit.

But surely the real match here is Mills vs Chambers. Can Chambo avenge his 1 goal loss from their last confrontation?? :lol:

Depends if our midfielders get the ball to him quickly, instaed of allowing the Bays to block us from getting our run as usual. This being the real reason Chambers doesn't kick many against Glenelg.

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:15 am
by Cambridge Clarrie
Should be one of the games of the year. Hopefully it's a fine weather day and they get 6,000+ there!

Sturt have proven over recent weeks that they have many more avenues to goal than just Chambo... I'm happy for the bays to hold him goal less so long as we win. I have a strange (and perhaps unfounded) sense of confidence that Sturt will be in this all day and hopefully get over the line...

Go Blues!!!

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:19 am
by dedja
History means sweet FA ... the side that is (even slightly) off the boil will lose.

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:25 am
by Jimmy
gonna be a beauty to listen to, cant wait.

go blues.

i'll tip the blues in an upset.

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:26 am
by Voice
dedja wrote:History means sweet FA ... the side that is (even slightly) off the boil will lose.

Agree. Both sides best is very good and it's hard to split them atm. By qtr time we'll know which team is switched on. Hopefully both which will make for a cracking game.

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:27 am
by CENTURION
GOING BY CURRENT FORM, $turd will win.

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:28 am
by Jimmy
CENTURION wrote:GOING BY CURRENT FORM, $turd will win.


who is $turd?

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:29 am
by Cambridge Clarrie
Jimmy wrote:
CENTURION wrote:GOING BY CURRENT FORM, $turd will win.


who is $turd?


We certainly don't have any $!

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:31 am
by dsriggs
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:
Jimmy wrote:
CENTURION wrote:GOING BY CURRENT FORM, $turd will win.


who is $turd?


We certainly don't have any $!

Unley does have plenty of turds though, so he's half right!

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:33 am
by Cambridge Clarrie
dsriggs wrote:
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:
Jimmy wrote:
CENTURION wrote:GOING BY CURRENT FORM, $turd will win.


who is $turd?


We certainly don't have any $!

Unley does have plenty of turds though, so he's half right!


Touche... (only after we've hosted the Bays supporters though...) ;)

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:34 am
by CUTTERMAN
Headed by Centurion, you guys act like morons concerning this crap.

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:36 am
by Voice
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:
Jimmy wrote:
CENTURION wrote:GOING BY CURRENT FORM, $turd will win.


who is $turd?


We certainly don't have any $!

I played this game with him the other day. He proceded to shut me up with quite a funny comment. He's quick, old CENTURION

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:39 am
by Cambridge Clarrie
CUTTERMAN wrote:Headed by Centurion, you guys act like morons concerning this crap.


He's probably a tad jealous that the turds he speaks of have a higher IQ than those that walk through the gates of the Ponderosa (and are more likely to lodge a tax return!) ;)

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:44 am
by dedja
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:Headed by Centurion, you guys act like morons concerning this crap.


He's probably a tad jealous that the turds he speaks of have a higher IQ than those that walk through the gates of the Ponderosa (and are more likely to lodge a tax return!) ;)


Now, now ... we can't all be Rhodes Scholars my friend. ;)

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:45 am
by The Apostle
I hope Glenelg and Sturt both beat the living suitcases out of each other. [-o< :axe: b-( :ympray:

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:45 am
by Jimmy
dedja wrote:
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:Headed by Centurion, you guys act like morons concerning this crap.


He's probably a tad jealous that the turds he speaks of have a higher IQ than those that walk through the gates of the Ponderosa (and are more likely to lodge a tax return!) ;)


Now, now ... we can't all be Rhodes Scholars my friend. ;)


thats right, i know plenty of smart people from elizabeff...we just never stay there ;)

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:46 am
by bayman
Jimmy wrote:gonna be a beauty to listen to, cant wait.

go blues.

i'll tip the blues in an upset.



why would it (sturt winning) be an upset ? i would think the betting would be pretty even & sturt at home might be marginal favourites, i'd expect this to go down to the wire & hopeful of a bay victory.....if sturt can't win or at least go the full 4 quarters given norMAL luck in the match i doubt they could beat us at footy park because mentally they'd be gone, which makes it a slightly more important game for sturt

Re: Bays v's Sturt

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:46 am
by dedja
The Apostle AK wrote:I hope Glenelg and Sturt both beat the living suitcases out of each other. [-o< :axe: b-( :ympray:


Likewise in R22 ... ;)