by magpie in the 80's » Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:43 pm
by MightyEagles » Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:48 pm
by eaglehaslanded » Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:51 pm
by MightyEagles » Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:51 pm
by spell_check » Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:03 pm
by smithy » Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:31 pm
by Aerie » Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:34 pm
by Cambridge Clarrie » Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:56 pm
by purch » Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:08 pm
by purch » Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:12 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:How good was Martin's work in front of the grandstand in the second qtr?!![]()
I think it was MAL who picked it earliest - this kid is going to be a champ...
by Cambridge Clarrie » Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:24 pm
purch wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:How good was Martin's work in front of the grandstand in the second qtr?!![]()
I think it was MAL who picked it earliest - this kid is going to be a champ...
Martin BOG by a mile IMO. He'll might get a call up before Birdbrain one would think.
Then again I just watched sports tonight and apperntly Birdman is ready to return to AwFL footy and he displayed his trademark leap to everyone today...???![]()
![]()
He was slaughtered (but he wasnlt alone)
by csbowes » Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:47 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:01 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:How good was Martin's work in front of the grandstand in the second qtr?!![]()
I think it was MAL who picked it earliest - this kid is going to be a champ...
by CUTTERMAN » Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:07 pm
wedgetail wrote:
Some factors to consider for this game - Eagles only 6 days to recover compared to Strut 7; Eagles will probably have heavy legs after their game on a soft oval (not sure what Waikerie Oval was like but would think it was firmer than Woodville); Eagles absorbed a lot of physical punishment from Port whereas Strut seemed to have a pretty soft game against West. These are purely observations that could, but hopefully not effect the Eags' performance. Strut suffered badly a few rounds earlier when they only had 5 days to recover. In the SANFL where the players have to work etc, a day or two less to recover is telling.
Having said that, I'll be very disappointed if we don't make up for that debacle against Strut earlier this year.
I don't think Sturt's break before the North game had anything to do with the result, if we faded in the last 1/4 and lost by a few goals then maybe, but not when you hardly give a whimper all game.
If your going to start making excuses for a "possible" loss 5 days before the game, at least show some sort of respect to the "possible" victor by spelling their name correctly instead of rehashing tired old cheap shots.
However, pygmy mentalities apart, I expect this to be very close, and hope to god Burton isn't playing. He seems to be very hungry and focused to get back to the Crows. Watch out anyone who will get in the way of that destiny.
by centrecirclelegend » Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:21 pm
by am Bays » Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:23 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:30 pm
by Mr Fuller » Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:06 pm
by FlyingHigh » Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:18 pm
by spell_check » Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:24 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Sturt are a good team and were far too good today, but I believe we can be this good. Our tactics in the second quarter were a disgrace. Trying to kick short off half-back with a 4-5 goal wind, when we needed at least 6 goal to 2 quarter to get back into the game. Especially when there was Salter, Passador (before injured) and the uncertainty of what Burton could do.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |