by Big Phil » Mon Jul 06, 2009 2:16 pm
by cd » Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:47 pm
by Big Phil » Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:50 pm
cd wrote:As a paid up member Big Phil you've got your tip wrong!!!
Col D
by Mickyj » Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:42 pm
by Big Phil » Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:56 pm
Mickyj wrote:For myself Sturt should have this game won.hanging my head in shame.
BUT after yesterday's game and if the majority of yesterday's side plays well anything is possible .
A functioning forward line like against Port could be a big help .If the mid field performs then that makes it easier for the forwards .And by this I mean getting the ruck taps and taking the ball from centre.BUT also closing down Sturts mid fielders like I watched the likes of fiacchi do against Port some very fine close in work there .
The biggest worry would be Full Back on Chambers IMHO.
GO U EAGLES !!!!
by dedja » Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:16 pm
by wedgetail » Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:45 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:26 pm
wedgetail wrote:Some factors to consider for this game - Eagles only 6 days to recover compared to Strut 7; Eagles will probably have heavy legs after their game on a soft oval (not sure what Waikerie Oval was like but would think it was firmer than Woodville); Eagles absorbed a lot of physical punishment from Port whereas Strut seemed to have a pretty soft game against West. These are purely observations that could, but hopefully not effect the Eags' performance. Strut suffered badly a few rounds earlier when they only had 5 days to recover. In the SANFL where the players have to work etc, a day or two less to recover is telling.
Having said that, I'll be very disappointed if we don't make up for that debacle against Strut earlier this year.
by Mickyj » Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:49 pm
wedgetail wrote: Eagles absorbed a lot of physical punishment from Port whereas Strut seemed to have a pretty soft game against West.
by spell_check » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:05 pm
Mickyj wrote:Last time Eagles failed against Sturt how many of yesterday's team actually were playing ? I bet a few in the Forward-line weren't.Perhaps even one or two who could match or equal 11 goals
by Mickyj » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:08 pm
spell_check wrote:Mickyj wrote:Last time Eagles failed against Sturt how many of yesterday's team actually were playing ? I bet a few in the Forward-line weren't.Perhaps even one or two who could match or equal 11 goals
9 - Allmond, Broadbent, Corbett, Dabrowski, P.Fiacchi, Hill, Jarrad, McGregor, Miles.
The other players yesterday were: Banner, Burton, Cheep, Cicolella, R.Fiacchi, Goldsworthy, McKenzie, Passador, Petrenko, Redden, Rimington, Salter.
by Aerie » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:17 pm
by spell_check » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:17 pm
Mickyj wrote:spell_check wrote:Mickyj wrote:Last time Eagles failed against Sturt how many of yesterday's team actually were playing ? I bet a few in the Forward-line weren't.Perhaps even one or two who could match or equal 11 goals
9 - Allmond, Broadbent, Corbett, Dabrowski, P.Fiacchi, Hill, Jarrad, McGregor, Miles.
The other players yesterday were: Banner, Burton, Cheep, Cicolella, R.Fiacchi, Goldsworthy, McKenzie, Passador, Petrenko, Redden, Rimington, Salter.
I may have written that wrong spelly by matching chambers 11 I was talking about Passador and Salter .
Pretty certain Passador was not playing last game .
by CUTTERMAN » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:26 pm
Aerie wrote:This is the Eagles last chance to stay in the race for a top 3 spot. Lose to Sturt and they'll be 1 and a half games behind 3rd spot and Sturt would still have a game in hand. As good as yesterday was in embedding us in the top 5 and putting Port out of the race, this week is even more important.
The Eagles have been up and down all season, but must bring their best to Unley Oval on Saturday. This is the classic "4 point" game.
by Mickyj » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:31 pm
spell_check wrote:Mickyj wrote:spell_check wrote:Mickyj wrote:Last time Eagles failed against Sturt how many of yesterday's team actually were playing ? I bet a few in the Forward-line weren't.Perhaps even one or two who could match or equal 11 goals
9 - Allmond, Broadbent, Corbett, Dabrowski, P.Fiacchi, Hill, Jarrad, McGregor, Miles.
The other players yesterday were: Banner, Burton, Cheep, Cicolella, R.Fiacchi, Goldsworthy, McKenzie, Passador, Petrenko, Redden, Rimington, Salter.
I may have written that wrong spelly by matching chambers 11 I was talking about Passador and Salter .
Pretty certain Passador was not playing last game .
The other 12 players did not play in the Sturt match but played yesterday. And in actual fact, Cheep also played in that match as well, so 10 players who played yesterday also played then.
by eddie eagle » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:32 pm
by Aerie » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:34 pm
eddie eagle wrote:Unfortunately $kurt will win by 5 goals, no match up for chambers apparent.
by dedja » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:36 pm
Aerie wrote:eddie eagle wrote:Unfortunately $kurt will win by 5 goals, no match up for chambers apparent.
Zac Hier will come in and do the job. Besides last game, he has generally done well on Chambers. It also depends on how much pressure our midfield puts on theirs. Last time it was non-existant.
by spell_check » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:44 pm
eddie eagle wrote:Unfortunately $kurt will start white hot favourites to win. No match up for chambers apparent. Didn't west only just beat chambers by less than a goal?
by once_were_warriors » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:44 pm
Aerie wrote:eddie eagle wrote:Unfortunately $kurt will win by 5 goals, no match up for chambers apparent.
Zac Hier will come in and do the job. Besides last game, he has generally done well on Chambers. It also depends on how much pressure our midfield puts on theirs. Last time it was non-existant.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |