State Game review

All discussions to do with the SANFL

State Game review

Postby scott » Sat May 23, 2009 6:19 pm

Code: Select all
Match Scores
WAFL           3.0   7.4   7.7  12.10   (82)
SANFL          4.3   5.4   8.8  12.9    (81)

Goals
WAFL: Jetta 3, Lecras 3, Richardson 2, Farmer, McGrath, Salecic, Chartres.
SANFL: Chambers 5, Evans 3, White 2, Backwell, Zorzi.

Leading Players

WAFL:
LeCras 15 kicks, 9 marks, 5 handballs
Hildebrandt 12 kicks, 6 marks, 12 handballs
Oliver 14 kicks, 8 marks, 8 handballs
Robinson 12 kicks, 8 marks, 9 handballs
Parker 8 kicks, 7 marks, 13 handballs
Bell 11 kicks, 7 marks, 10 handballs
Farmer 13 kicks, 5 marks, 9 handballs

SANFL:
Backwell 16 kicks, 5 marks, 17 handballs
Sheedy 20 kicks, 4 marks, 9 handballs
Gum 15 kicks, 7 marks, 8 handballs
Panozzo 13 kicks, 4 marks, 13 handballs
White 10 kicks, 9 marks, 7 handballs
Clayton 11 kicks, 4 marks, 13 handballs
Chambers 10 kicks, 6 marks, 3 handballs


Match Stats                     WAFL                      SANFL
                           Q1  Q2  Q3  Q4    T - T    Q1  Q2  Q3  Q4
Long Kicks                  7  15   9  15   46 - 49   11   6  18  20
Short Kicks                26  30  31  24  111 - 90   23  28  18  21
General Kicks              50  57  61  53  222 - 213  52  56  48  57
(Backwards Kicks)           3   9   3   3  (18 - 10)   3   3   3   1 

Effective Handballs        22  40  44  26  132 - 162  43  35  51  33
Total Handballs            29  50  54  33  166 - 189  49  40  59  41

Effective Disposals        55  85  86  65  291 - 305  77  70  87  71
Ineffective Disposals      24  22  29  22   97 - 97   24  26  20  27
Total Disposals            79 107 115  87  388 - 402 101  96 107  98
Efficiency %               70% 79% 75% 75% 75% - 76%  76% 73% 81% 72%

Unconstested Marks         26  32  26  22  106 - 81   21  28  10  22
Contested Marks             3   6   1   3   13 - 16    3   2   6   5
Total Marks                29  38  27  25  119 - 97   24  30  16  27
Play on from Mark %        41% 37% 33% 40% 38% - 52%  42% 53% 38% 67%

Contested Possessions      26  33  31  37  127 - 132  32  25  40  35
Uncontested Possessions    53  75  82  51  261 - 262  68  70  66  58

Hard Ball Gets              6  11  12  14   43 - 56   18  13  11  14
Loose Ball Gets             9  11  11  13   44 - 43    7   6  18  12
Handball Receives          22  39  43  25  129 - 160  43  35  50  32

Tackles                    13  12   7  11   43 - 27    7  12   4   4
Ground Ball Gets           42  65  79  56  242 - 280  72  61  85  62

Total Hit Outs              7   8   2   4   21 - 43    9  14  12   8
Hit Outs to Adv             0   2   0   1    3 - 6     2   3   1   0
% of H/Os to Adv            0% 25%  0% 25% 14% - 14%  33% 21%  8%  0%

Centre Clearances           2   1   0   5    8 - 12    4   2   3   3
Throw In Clearances         1   1   0   1    3 - 8     0   3   4   1
Ball Up Clearances          1   3   3   2    9 - 17    4   8   2   3
Total Clearances            4   5   3   8   20 - 37    8  13   9   7

Inside 50s                 11  14   8  12   45 - 50   10   7  16  17
Rebound 50s                 6   5  13  12   36 - 32    8  10   7   7

Knock Ons                   4   1   3   0    8 - 4     1   0   3   0
Spoils                      5   6   4   4   19 - 16    4   3   7   2
Smothers                    0   0   0   1    1 - 6     0   4   1   1
Shepherds                   1   0   6   1    8 - 8     2   2   3   1
Total One Percenters       29  30  32  31  122 - 117  32  34  29  22
 
Free Kicks                  8   5   7   7   27 - 17    4   4   5   4
50m Penalties               1   0   1   1    3 - 0     0   0   0   0
Kicks OOF                   2   0   1   1    4 - 1     0   0   0   1
Dropped Marks               2   2   3   0    7 - 2     1   1   0   0
Clangers                   12  10  16   9   47 - 54   14  11  14  15

Stoppages        Q1  Q2  Q3  Q4    T
Centre Bounce     8   6   4  10   28
Throw In          4   4   5   2   15
Ball Up           6  16   6   7   35
Total            18  26  15  19   78
User avatar
scott
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3760
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Noarlunga Oval
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: State Game review

Postby The Apostle » Sat May 23, 2009 6:32 pm

Whatever I said in the live score thread will do for a comment from me for now...too physically and emotionally drained at the moment...I feel like curling up in a ball in the corner and having a good cry...
The Apostle
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1696
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: State Game review

Postby whufc » Sat May 23, 2009 6:34 pm

Have spoke about it on the other thread but will say, the majority of people on SAFooty questioned a few of the selections decisions, which i think we were justified by the performance on the field.

Considering the inside 50 count i thought the defence player fairly well as a whole with Ryan Williams probably been the excpetion, he had an absolute shocker especially his disposal.

The midfield won plenty of ball, as well as clearances, but due to lack of abiltiy to kick the ball long and get forward, they didn't hurt WA even the slightest. I thought the slow movement through the midfield made it alot harder for the forwards to function with structure, as the WA talls were able to dop back.

Up forward, Chambers, White, Evans and Gum were effective especially considering how slow the ball was coming down.

We may have had no crumbers but the lack of midfielders willing to get inside 50 and try and kick a goal didn't help are cause.

Like i have said a few times it's all good and well for the midfielders to pick up 30 possesions but unless they can convert some of them into scoring oppurtunties or progress the ball inside 50 its not going to hurt the opposition.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28566
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5910 times
Been liked: 2826 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: State Game review

Postby Sojourner » Sat May 23, 2009 6:50 pm

Congratulations to the WAFL who until next time we meet wear the label of being the second best competition in Oz after the AFL. Gutsy play from a side whose players are paid considerably less than us and train often with lesser facilities. Bluntly they wanted it more and they earned it today.

I hope the recruiting staff of the SANFL clubs were watching today, at the end of the year if they are looking for recruits, I saw a few today that look like they could play quite o.k in the SANFL competiton!

Anyway good luck to them, I am sure we will get our opportunity to square it up at some stage in the next few years!
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: State Game review

Postby leftlegger » Sat May 23, 2009 7:01 pm

Exciting game.
But.... I cant help but thinking if we had the Gowans twins + O Sullivan + Cranston we would have won easily.
Having said that, I'm also glad Cranny didnt play.

I thought Sheedy, Backwell & White were our best on the day, and home town umpiring decisions late in the game cost us dearly.
Very dissapointing from an SA patriot's point of view
Yeah, Naah,..... Bollocks!
User avatar
leftlegger
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: PHOS Camden

Re: State Game review

Postby Mr66 » Sat May 23, 2009 7:08 pm

The Apostle AK wrote:Whatever I said in the live score thread will do for a comment from me for now...too physically and emotionally drained at the moment...I feel like curling up in a ball in the corner and having a good cry...


..and after you've done that, obtaining a life would be the next step. :? :D
If one person does it, it's insanity. If millions do it, it's religion.

http://www.beyondblue.org.au
User avatar
Mr66
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4392
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:08 pm
Location: Where the Streets Have No Name
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: State Game review

Postby westozfalcon » Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm

Yooouuu little beeeaauuuty \:D/

The WA boys played for the jumper all the way and deserved the win.

There was a fair degree of arrogance shown by some posters on this site suggesting SA were going to smash us but they'll be tucking into their humble pie now. :lol:
westozfalcon
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Perth WA
Has liked: 113 times
Been liked: 28 times

Re: State Game review

Postby Barto » Sat May 23, 2009 8:41 pm

One bloody point. Devastated. :(
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: State Game review

Postby am Bays » Sat May 23, 2009 9:00 pm

BOG and most couragous has to go to those two female WA trainers in the shorts.
Love your work girls. As an SA Trainer Barto, surely there had to be some high beam showing there???
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19619
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2090 times

Re: State Game review

Postby EAGLES » Sat May 23, 2009 9:20 pm

i blame alleway
Has he even kicked a goal or taken more then a few marks in any games in the last month
EAGLES
Member
 
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:07 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: State Game review

Postby Barto » Sat May 23, 2009 9:24 pm

am Bays wrote:BOG and most couragous has to go to those two female WA trainers in the shorts.
Love your work girls. As an SA Trainer Barto, surely there had to be some high beam showing there???


I was too busy running to notice! Definitely a higher pace at that level than what there is normally in the WAFL (yes, I have had a look there!)

BTW: the news gets worse for South. Parry will miss a fair few games after damaging his AC. Was in a lot of pain after the game as the injection was wearing off. Iced it up for him, but I wouldn't like to have a bumpy ride home if I were him.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: State Game review

Postby Chambo100 » Sat May 23, 2009 9:47 pm

You can't pick players with 10 games experience in a state game.
It showed up big time on a bigger stage.
Martin (one of my team's guys), Schmitt and a few other first timers, just weren't up to it.

Why you pick a coach who can't get gig elsewhere (ok he may not want one) and an assistant who is struggling just to get a side to be competitive, is beyond me.

We had many guys who looked like they were running on the spot and didn't even look like they wanted to challenge the man with the ball. Our overall skill level and decision making did nothing to verify that these are the best blokes going around in our comp.

In heavy conditions I really don't think you can have a White / Alleway up forward and especially when there is nobody parked at their boot laces. This art of crumbing is a forgotten doctrine these days.

Let's face it, nobody seems to be totally serious about state footy, so maybe don't bother until you are. How may people showed up to the game - it looked like the Colosseum on Christmas Day!

The state games that have been promoted as big events in my lifetime, and I can't really recall one since 1989, have been absolute crackers.

Yes this is only state league and not AFL, but if you settle for second best, then it will be.

I made a comment today that I reckon the SANFL and WAFL could be promoted more effectively by their respective adminstrations, but would that tread on their AFL marketing allegiances? Not sure totally about that, but worth considering.

For me, I hate what the AFL has become and really couldn't give a toss about it. State league footy is where it has always been real and honours past traditions that are very worthwhile preserving.

Just look at the umpteen-thousand posts on this site. There some very passionate (and maybe at times imbalanced) people who hold this philosophy dear.

To everyone (which must be about 95+ % of you) who applauded Peter Carey's indoctrination into the Hall of Fame - then that is vindication of what I am saying.

........It is fair that the Jumbo Prince is next!
User avatar
Chambo100
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:25 pm
Location: In Front of The Harry Mackay Stand
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: State Game review

Postby The Apostle » Sat May 23, 2009 10:26 pm

westozfalcon wrote:There was a fair degree of arrogance shown by some posters on this site suggesting SA were going to smash us but they'll be tucking into their humble pie now. :lol:


Example(s)? If they were saying that then they were in a very small minority...you could fit their names on a small post-it note.
The Apostle
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1696
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: State Game review

Postby bulldogs » Sat May 23, 2009 10:30 pm

didnt see the game but biggest stat to come out of the run down was the free kick count WA 27 SA 17 and 50s WA 3 SA 0.
bulldogs
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: State Game review

Postby Barto » Sat May 23, 2009 10:52 pm

Chambo100 wrote:Let's face it, nobody seems to be totally serious about state footy, so maybe don't bother until you are. How may people showed up to the game - it looked like the Colosseum on Christmas Day!

The state games that have been promoted as big events in my lifetime, and I can't really recall one since 1989, have been absolute crackers.

Yes this is only state league and not AFL, but if you settle for second best, then it will be.

I made a comment today that I reckon the SANFL and WAFL could be promoted more effectively by their respective adminstrations, but would that tread on their AFL marketing allegiances? Not sure totally about that, but worth considering.

For me, I hate what the AFL has become and really couldn't give a toss about it. State league footy is where it has always been real and honours past traditions that are very worthwhile preserving.

Just look at the umpteen-thousand posts on this site. There some very passionate (and maybe at times imbalanced) people who hold this philosophy dear.

To everyone (which must be about 95+ % of you) who applauded Peter Carey's indoctrination into the Hall of Fame - then that is vindication of what I am saying.

........It is fair that the Jumbo Prince is next!


The players appeared to take it seriously, believe me they were going in hard and the talk before the game was all about state pride and pride in the clubs they represent.

I'm gutted by the lack of turn out today, a big let down after the big one 6 years ago at Freo Oval. There were at least 7000 people there IIRC, yet today you could fire a machine gun and be unlucky to hit someone. In fairness the weather has been absolutely shocking and people just aren't that dedicated on a Saturday afternoon when there's other options.

As for promotion, there is never enough for the local comps. When people asked me what I was up to this weekend and I told them, not one person had a clue this event was on.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: State Game review

Postby Barto » Sat May 23, 2009 10:53 pm

westozfalcon wrote:Yooouuu little beeeaauuuty \:D/

The WA boys played for the jumper all the way and deserved the win.

There was a fair degree of arrogance shown by some posters on this site suggesting SA were going to smash us but they'll be tucking into their humble pie now. :lol:


Honestly, having been involved in both leagues, I thought SA would have smashed the local boys.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: State Game review

Postby Thiele » Sat May 23, 2009 10:58 pm

Ferguson isn't a ruckman. Should of kept him on LeCras
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28397
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 173 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: State Game review

Postby Wedgie » Sat May 23, 2009 11:50 pm

Thiele wrote:Ferguson isn't a ruckman. Should of kept him on LeCras


They had no choice when Parry did his AC and I think Ferguson did an admiral job in ruck considering he wouldn't normally play there. I also thought the time he spent on LeCras was the only time LeCras was beaten as LeCras even beat Damon White early on before White got moved up forward to play a pivotal role.
r&b might be winning me over. :D
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: State Game review

Postby Wedgie » Sun May 24, 2009 12:22 am

I know hindsight is a wonderful thing but this is different as most of us if not all of us called it before the game but how different would the result have been if we'd had Cranston, Mieklejohn, the Gowans and O'Sullivan instead of Dabrowski, Parry, Wright, Schmidt, Meyer and Martin?
Admittedly the state side was a bit unlucky losing Parry who was playing well IMHO and Allan and even though Alleway had a shocker he was a must have.
I think we need a complete overhaul from here on in, despite Harty having a great state record and I'm not sure if the interest is there but wouldn't it be great to see Laird coach the side?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: State Game review

Postby NFC » Sun May 24, 2009 1:21 am

Chambo100 wrote:You can't pick players with 10 games experience in a state game.
It showed up big time on a bigger stage.
Martin (one of my team's guys), Schmitt and a few other first timers, just weren't up to it.!

What the heck was wrong with his game? :?
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |