Page 1 of 2

Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:38 am
by EAGLES
Rumours of (an)other great divide in the playing group?

Two senior players at logger heads with each other?

Half the playing group is behind one and half is behind the other?

Would it to HANDBY to find out who one of the players is?????????????????????????

As soon as South (oops sorry, the Panthers) joins the SFL the better for our comp.

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:58 am
by redandblack
Yes, then we could relegate the next bottom team, then the next, then the next, then your team, then the next and finish with a 2 team competition.

Sturt were bottom for years on end, then came back to win a premiership.

I support West and we're doing it tough, but I also back every club in the league (well, maybe Port are an exception ;) ) to survive and have some success.

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 1:05 pm
by Sojourner
EAGLES wrote:Rumours of (an)other great divide in the playing group?

Two senior players at logger heads with each other?

Half the playing group is behind one and half is behind the other?

Would it to HANDBY to find out who one of the players is?????????????????????????

As soon as South (oops sorry, the Panthers) joins the SFL the better for our comp.


Maybe we could merge with another SANFL side and lose a record number of premierships - oh wait a minute....... :roll:

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 1:11 pm
by Wedgie
At least they're 2 points ahead of Port on the table when they've imploded! :lol:

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 1:13 pm
by Mickyj
Is this an encounter bay thing pretty sure the playing group was at war when The Eagles played them down there.

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 2:41 pm
by bayman
in 1965

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:29 pm
by saintal
You seem to know a lot eh...

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:19 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
maybe the Eagles should join the amateur league

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:45 pm
by prowling panther
Wow! two players talk tactics to each other at 3/4 time and all of a sudden we have some one who hears something from someone else who wasnt there, but heard it from someone else who is a second cousin to the doorkeeper and the water boy.

FFS the sooner you stick to the facts and spread the rumors about what actually happened the better off you will be.

So MYOB and FO

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:21 pm
by EAGLES
subpol wrote:Wow! two players talk tactics to each other at 3/4 time and all of a sudden we have some one who hears something from someone else who wasnt there, but heard it from someone else who is a second cousin to the doorkeeper and the water boy.

FFS the sooner you stick to the facts and spread the romurs abiout what actually happened the better off you will be.

So MYOB and FO




Who mentioned 3/4 time?

Now I am interested, please tell all?

This has been brewing for a month mate.

It's ok, if it makes you feel better you can keep on kidding yourself and tell yourself that nothing is wrong at all.

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:36 pm
by Bluedemon
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:maybe the Eagles should join the amateur league


They already have, there name is the Henley (Sharks) Eagles

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:14 pm
by EAGLES
boom
Will sambo undermine the south coach as usual
Oh
Hang on

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:12 pm
by smac
Yes, they certainly have appeared to.

Not strong enough and not skilled enough today, a long way to go before they are a really competitive side.

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:19 pm
by smithy
The SANFL should make sure that South never get on TV again.
They are embarrassing our competition nationally with televised performances like that.

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:21 pm
by southee
smac wrote:Yes, they certainly have appeared to.

Not strong enough and not skilled enough today, a long way to go before they are a really competitive side.


Yep...been since 1964 and it has been a long way to go since then!!!

It was like watching a horror movie that performance!!!! :evil:

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:18 pm
by Tassie Blues
no way have the imploded this would mean they had rebuilt from last years imploding there just sh*% like they were last year.

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:23 pm
by StrayDog
!! zzzzzziF

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:02 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
smac wrote:Yes, they certainly have appeared to.

Not strong enough and not skilled enough today, a long way to go before they are a really competitive side.


Hmph......Must only have been Dog fans who did not know this.

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:21 pm
by spell_check
EAGLES wrote:Rumours of (an)other great divide in the playing group?

Two senior players at logger heads with each other?

Half the playing group is behind one and half is behind the other?

Would it to HANDBY to find out who one of the players is?????????????????????????

As soon as South (oops sorry, the Panthers) joins the SFL the better for our comp.


No team needs to go anywhere, what South does is their business.

Re: Have South imploded?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:00 pm
by Dog_ger
spell_check wrote:
EAGLES wrote:Rumours of (an)other great divide in the playing group?

Two senior players at logger heads with each other?

Half the playing group is behind one and half is behind the other?

Would it to HANDBY to find out who one of the players is?????????????????????????

As soon as South (oops sorry, the Panthers) joins the SFL the better for our comp.


No team needs to go anywhere, what South does is their business.


Agreed Spelly.

South have to do something, not just stand there.