by Jimmy » Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:07 pm
by Jimmy » Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:08 pm
Dutchy wrote:Jimmy wrote:The Apostle AK wrote:I still think it's "funny" that Sturt were crying poor back in Octoberand now suddenly seem to have their own pot of gold.
good business plans AK!
i cant remember the club crying poor, just ppl reporting on our situation.
Talking to a long time Sturt man during the week, he said he went to the AGM last year and the talk of the financial situation was very dire, and here we are 12 months later and things are looking very positive...at the end of the say I think its great they have turned it around, it has just suprised me how quick it has been
by Mickyj » Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:56 pm
Wedgie wrote:Mickyj wrote:Wedgie wrote:Mickyj wrote:
This seems to have been going on this site this pre-season.If its not sturt its the eagles not having money for transfer fees!!
And seeing none of us have seen any of the clubs finances its probably just a baited hook thrown out to get bite by some bored posters
Must admit I haen't seen or heard anything about the Eagles on here, thought they were fairly healthy.
Club's finances are pretty well known by most, its not like they're a secret as they're reported fairly publicly every year. I would say most of us have seen club's finances, definately not "none".
Perhaps u should read a post by the sleeping giant he was trying to say Eagles had transfer fee problems .But no one answered him![]()
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=24829&p=870573#p870573
Well I haven't seen any club finances but have heard the Eagles have improved greatly .
1 poster making an ill informed comment hardly speaks for the entire site like you mentioned in your post.
I personally thought the Eagles had been doing OK since opening their establishment on Port Rd a few years back.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Dec 20, 2009 4:05 pm
Wedgie wrote:Mickyj wrote:Wedgie wrote:Mickyj wrote:
This seems to have been going on this site this pre-season.If its not sturt its the eagles not having money for transfer fees!!
And seeing none of us have seen any of the clubs finances its probably just a baited hook thrown out to get bite by some bored posters
Must admit I haen't seen or heard anything about the Eagles on here, thought they were fairly healthy.
Club's finances are pretty well known by most, its not like they're a secret as they're reported fairly publicly every year. I would say most of us have seen club's finances, definately not "none".
Perhaps u should read a post by the sleeping giant he was trying to say Eagles had transfer fee problems .But no one answered him![]()
http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php? ... 73#p870573
Well I haven't seen any club finances but have heard the Eagles have improved greatly .
1 poster making an ill informed comment hardly speaks for the entire site like you mentioned in your post.
I personally thought the Eagles had been doing OK since opening their establishment on Port Rd a few years back.
by Mickyj » Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:37 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:FFS.
It's not ill informed. Comes from an excellent source. The Eagles couldn't afford the transfer fee for James Boyd. They have thrown bucket loads at Scott Welsh and Craig Parry.
You can choose not to believe what I have heard MickyJ, but remember, other club supporters may know whats going on at your club.
p.s. Never said your lot were in financial trouble. Maybe your transfer fee budget has been blown already.
by locky801 » Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:42 pm
Mickyj wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:FFS.
It's not ill informed. Comes from an excellent source. The Eagles couldn't afford the transfer fee for James Boyd. They have thrown bucket loads at Scott Welsh and Craig Parry.
You can choose not to believe what I have heard MickyJ, but remember, other club supporters may know whats going on at your club.
p.s. Never said your lot were in financial trouble. Maybe your transfer fee budget has been blown already.
Funny how I woke you up Sleeping Giant .Just for what its worth I passed on your thoughts to the Eagles CEO thursday night (Matt1 saw me talking with him).He laughed at what you said and told me we are in much better shape than this time last year.
So for forum Readers you can weigh up sleeping giant versus Eagles CEO.
I'll let u decide .
No idea about what they have spent except what I was told by a south player about the amount paid for Parry.
Cheers
by Mickyj » Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:49 pm
locky801 wrote:Mickyj wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:FFS.
It's not ill informed. Comes from an excellent source. The Eagles couldn't afford the transfer fee for James Boyd. They have thrown bucket loads at Scott Welsh and Craig Parry.
You can choose not to believe what I have heard MickyJ, but remember, other club supporters may know whats going on at your club.
p.s. Never said your lot were in financial trouble. Maybe your transfer fee budget has been blown already.
Funny how I woke you up Sleeping Giant .Just for what its worth I passed on your thoughts to the Eagles CEO thursday night (Matt1 saw me talking with him).He laughed at what you said and told me we are in much better shape than this time last year.
So for forum Readers you can weigh up sleeping giant versus Eagles CEO.
I'll let u decide .
No idea about what they have spent except what I was told by a south player about the amount paid for Parry.
Cheers
Lets just hope you get your moneys worth
by Voice » Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:07 pm
Jimmy wrote:lachlan wrote:Barto,
I'm just agreeing with Voice about the fact that sturt are too old & too slow.
At least with all the tranfer fees you have paid out it means that the clubs cash flow is very strong hence you will now be able to pay all your players on time
too old? too slow?
i actually think we are pretty young...only nelson would be over 30 i think. sheedy and chambo would be 29.
by Pseudo » Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:12 pm
Voice wrote:We are nowhere near old or slow.
by Voice » Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:18 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:24 pm
by lachlan » Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:47 pm
by whufc » Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:51 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Ak, Stuffed if I'm gonna quote the half page of insight and stuff up everyone else on this forum. So I'll do it this way-
To quote you-
"So, they've gone from crying poor 2 months ago to throwing around money left, right and centre (they've paid atleast $75,000 in transfer fees of late)."
left right and centre? mate give up on the exaggerations, FFS.
Do you understand that we have basically got Hassan and,(take your pick) Hinge or Giles for almost the same price you've paid in transfer fees for Boyd! Do you understand that? Entiendo? Sabes tonto?
Where do you base the $75k at?
Not to mention the "at least" bit.
2 months ago? What orrifice do you find this informative lint in?
Recruit 3 players and it's a sin! I couldn't give a **** how we afford it! If we can then we can. If players see a better future and playing enviroment at Sturt then good. Other's misfortune. Call the Vatican!
One thing you need to look at is the amount of players that have left Sturt to another SANFL club recently, how many of those have gone on to become prominent players, THEN, you want to have a look at how many players have come to Sturt recently, stayed and become better players.
So AK, going on that, once you've done the research, (apart from the paper gossip), try to determine the thinking of the players coming to the club based on recent history and any reasons why they want to leave their present/recent club.
here's a list for you going back when we WERE monetarily ******.
Atkinson, Squire, Threadgold, Conway, Bratton, McGlone, Cubillo, Gum, Vassal, Johncock are just off the top of my head, all have stayed for a good amount of time, become better players/medalists/captains and clubmen, none of these have walked out, only retired.
by Voice » Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:11 pm
lachlan wrote:Voice didn't take it seriously at all your comments about Sturt being too slow & Too Old.
I was writing CRAP like you do
by Bunton » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:06 pm
Mickyj wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:FFS.
It's not ill informed. Comes from an excellent source. The Eagles couldn't afford the transfer fee for James Boyd. They have thrown bucket loads at Scott Welsh and Craig Parry.
You can choose not to believe what I have heard MickyJ, but remember, other club supporters may know whats going on at your club.
p.s. Never said your lot were in financial trouble. Maybe your transfer fee budget has been blown already.
Funny how I woke you up Sleeping Giant .Just for what its worth I passed on your thoughts to the Eagles CEO thursday night (Matt1 saw me talking with him).He laughed at what you said and told me we are in much better shape than this time last year.
So for forum Readers you can weigh up sleeping giant versus Eagles CEO.
I'll let u decide .
No idea about what they have spent except what I was told by a south player about the amount paid for Parry.
Cheers
by spell_check » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:12 pm
by Bunton » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:16 pm
spell_check wrote:Still worried about transfer fees, I see.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:22 pm
Mickyj wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:FFS.
It's not ill informed. Comes from an excellent source. The Eagles couldn't afford the transfer fee for James Boyd. They have thrown bucket loads at Scott Welsh and Craig Parry.
You can choose not to believe what I have heard MickyJ, but remember, other club supporters may know whats going on at your club.
p.s. Never said your lot were in financial trouble. Maybe your transfer fee budget has been blown already.
Funny how I woke you up Sleeping Giant .Just for what its worth I passed on your thoughts to the Eagles CEO thursday night (Matt1 saw me talking with him).He laughed at what you said and told me we are in much better shape than this time last year.
So for forum Readers you can weigh up sleeping giant versus Eagles CEO.
I'll let u decide .
No idea about what they have spent except what I was told by a south player about the amount paid for Parry.
Cheers
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:28 pm
Bunton wrote:
Ask him this specific question ...
"Did the Eagles say they would take james Boyd in the proviso they could pay the $40k in installments, to which South said no"?
by CUTTERMAN » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:30 pm
whufc wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Ak, Stuffed if I'm gonna quote the half page of insight and stuff up everyone else on this forum. So I'll do it this way-
To quote you-
"So, they've gone from crying poor 2 months ago to throwing around money left, right and centre (they've paid atleast $75,000 in transfer fees of late)."
left right and centre? mate give up on the exaggerations, FFS.
Do you understand that we have basically got Hassan and,(take your pick) Hinge or Giles for almost the same price you've paid in transfer fees for Boyd! Do you understand that? Entiendo? Sabes tonto?
Where do you base the $75k at?
Not to mention the "at least" bit.
2 months ago? What orrifice do you find this informative lint in?
Recruit 3 players and it's a sin! I couldn't give a **** how we afford it! If we can then we can. If players see a better future and playing enviroment at Sturt then good. Other's misfortune. Call the Vatican!
One thing you need to look at is the amount of players that have left Sturt to another SANFL club recently, how many of those have gone on to become prominent players, THEN, you want to have a look at how many players have come to Sturt recently, stayed and become better players.
So AK, going on that, once you've done the research, (apart from the paper gossip), try to determine the thinking of the players coming to the club based on recent history and any reasons why they want to leave their present/recent club.
here's a list for you going back when we WERE monetarily ******.
Atkinson, Squire, Threadgold, Conway, Bratton, McGlone, Cubillo, Gum, Vassal, Johncock are just off the top of my head, all have stayed for a good amount of time, become better players/medalists/captains and clubmen, none of these have walked out, only retired.
I acutally think it's great other teams are getting out there and recruiting good on sturt for being pro active BUT is think his basing the $75 000 on what Kris Grant said about the $25000 being the standard transfer fee for a league regular footballer which all them three were. Comparing it to Central is a slight bit different in that we haven't came out and said we are short of cash or in financial danger or anything as such.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |