CK wrote:[On the question of older lists, without doing all the calculations, I wouldn't be surprised if it was actually North Adelaide that would go close on average age of the squad.
Off track I know, but...
Because it is late Friday afternoon AND it is quiet in the office AND I'm killing time until 5pm AND as I mentioned earlier, I found a Budget from Round 1 of season 2010, I thought I would do some quick calculations myself:
* This list shows the avergae age for each club based purely on the total age count divided by number of players listed in the Budget for Round 1 (Central's based on Round 2 as they had the first up bye) action from the start of the 2010 season.
I know it doesn't take into consideration injured players who didn't play, AFL players not playing, players that didn't actually play in Round 1, Retirements, Recruits etc etc but it is all that I could work from for the time being.1. West - 598 total age / 25 players listed = 23.92 average age
2. Nw'd - 568 total age / 24 players listed = 23.67 average age
3. Strt - 539 total age / 23 players listed = 23.43 average age
4. Eags - 559 total age / 24 players listed = 23.29 average age
5. Port - 512 total age / 22 players listed = 23.27 average age
6. Dogs - 558 total age / 24 players listed = 23.25 average age
7. Gl'ng - 477 total age / 21 players listed = 22.71 average age
8. Panf - 474 total age / 22 players listed = 21.55 average age
9. N'rth - 492 total age / 22 players listed = 21.39 average age