5 year deal beginning in 2014, player movements to begin next year.
VERY sad day for state footy!

by MATT IN WA » Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:07 am
by Go Legs » Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:27 am
by holden78 » Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:30 am
by Go Legs » Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:43 am
holden78 wrote:The big difference in SA is the Candy Crows can't be trusted and Port Flowers are that low and broke, they won't get anywhere near the SANFL comp now![]()
It's DEAD as an issue now and both clubs have done it to themselves which is fantastic!
by Jim05 » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:35 am
by PhilH » Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:01 am
by JamesH » Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:39 am
by Booney » Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:44 am
holden78 wrote:The big difference in SA is the Candy Crows can't be trusted and Port Flowers are that low and broke, they won't get anywhere near the SANFL comp now![]()
It's DEAD as an issue now and both clubs have done it to themselves which is fantastic!
by beenreal » Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:54 am
by JamesH » Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:55 am
PhilH wrote:I didn't beleive it until I read it but here it is.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/a/-/sport/15261650/2014-wafl-kick-off-for-eagles-dockers-as-cash-seals-the-deal/
30 pieces of silver is now $100,000
In a strange case of history repeating itself once again (as in 1986) the WAFL has caved in first and the pessimist in me says it will only be a matter of time before the SANFL has to follow.
Enjoy the SANFL next season, who knows what lies ahead in 2014 and beyond.
by JamesH » Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:58 am
by Jim05 » Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:37 pm
JamesH wrote:The VFL have already stated the will NOT take an Adelaide or Port reserves team.
National reserves are NOT on the AFL agenda.
The SANFL is not powerful anymore as it has lost its financial security and Football Park is on its way out.
by PhilH » Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:41 pm
by JK » Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:51 pm
JamesH wrote:The SANFL is not powerful anymore as it has lost its financial security and Football Park is on its way out.
by JamesH » Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:58 pm
PhilH wrote:I think the comparison is a valid one.
This is about a major change to the nature of the state league competition.
The last time such a major change occurred was when the AFL came to WA & SA.
On that occassion WA blinked first
Of this occassion re maintaining the integrity of our state league competition, WA blinked first.
It not about SANFL v VFL/AFL, it is about
- the SANFL still being a competition in its own right where every league side is 100% foucussed on winning the premiership
- its about media coverage being about all the clubs and games not just focussed on the crows / powers reserves sides which will be what happen in years to come.
- you only have to see coverage (what there is of it) of the modern VFL to see that it is branded as a reserves comp. I never want the SANFL to end up that way.
- maintaining the Magpies as "existing" to win premierships. If the Magpies league become the Port reserves and their #1 focus becomes devloping Power players then why would you need a Magpies reserves or Under 18's or a zone ... over time I can only see it being the end of the Magpies at first as we know them, eventually in total.
Of interest from the article is that there appears to have been no to minimal imput / vote from the 7 "non aligned" WAFL clubs.
by JamesH » Wed Oct 31, 2012 1:00 pm
JK wrote:JamesH wrote:The SANFL is not powerful anymore as it has lost its financial security and Football Park is on its way out.
I don't understand how the SANFL has lost it's financial security .. Sure they're probably hocked up to the eyeballs at the moment, but the minute Footy Park becomes available that land at West Lakes is worth a mint, surely they can provide their own security with money generated from it?
by JK » Wed Oct 31, 2012 1:56 pm
JamesH wrote:JK wrote:JamesH wrote:The SANFL is not powerful anymore as it has lost its financial security and Football Park is on its way out.
I don't understand how the SANFL has lost it's financial security .. Sure they're probably hocked up to the eyeballs at the moment, but the minute Footy Park becomes available that land at West Lakes is worth a mint, surely they can provide their own security with money generated from it?
Because it has an AFL club on life support that sent it into debt.
sale of the land will clear some debts..... but after that the SANFL will own nothing and have a small office at Adelaide Oval
by Ronnie » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:04 pm
JK wrote:JamesH wrote:JK wrote:JamesH wrote:The SANFL is not powerful anymore as it has lost its financial security and Football Park is on its way out.
I don't understand how the SANFL has lost it's financial security .. Sure they're probably hocked up to the eyeballs at the moment, but the minute Footy Park becomes available that land at West Lakes is worth a mint, surely they can provide their own security with money generated from it?
Because it has an AFL club on life support that sent it into debt.
sale of the land will clear some debts..... but after that the SANFL will own nothing and have a small office at Adelaide Oval
by UK Fan » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:44 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Booney » Wed Oct 31, 2012 3:10 pm
UK Fan wrote:Bye bye SANFL . Congrats AFL its taken 20 odd years but mission accomplished.
At least Power/Crows supporters are happy. Screw the rest I say
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |