mal wrote:GL couldnt beat CD on thier own Burkes Backyard earlier this season when they were trounced
This after that folklorish effort by CD who were down to about 9 fit players[it will be down to about 3 in years to come


by Dogwatcher » Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:38 am
mal wrote:GL couldnt beat CD on thier own Burkes Backyard earlier this season when they were trounced
This after that folklorish effort by CD who were down to about 9 fit players[it will be down to about 3 in years to come
by bayman » Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:38 am
mal wrote:bayman wrote:Dutchy wrote:Wouldnt read too much into it, 5 day break shouldnt happen in SANFL, esp this time of year, Why wouldnt you play this game on Sunday with no AFL on in town?
crap, we were insipid, woeful & no matter how good your opponent is you should at least match them with desire, committment, determination which we did not...........................................................by the way how did norwood go who also played on monday ?
Disunity amongst our Glenelg barrackers
The 3rd umpire needs to intervene b4 Dutchy and Bayman , dare I say it, implode with each other
5 DAY BREAKS
You would be deluding yourself if you think a 5 day break does not make some difference some of the time
NW made a mockery of the 5 day break with a dominant 2nd half v SA
GL were mauled by CD
So in one game it did, the other it didnt
WHY
GL played a potential premier, in an away game on the Ponderosa
NW played a potential wooden spooner on Burkes Backyard
Forgetting who played who
It is probably harder to play on a BIG oval compared to a sMALl oval with a 5 day break
MIND GAMES
GL couldnt beat CD on thier own Burkes Backyard earlier this season when they were trounced
This after that folklorish effort by CD who were down to about 9 fit players[it will be down to about 3 in years to come]
They played a really tough game against NW 5 days earlier and then had to face an awesome CD outfit
I say there is a real possibility that GL were a beaten side about 90 seconds after the NW game
by Mr Irate » Sun Jun 19, 2011 12:38 pm
bayman wrote:mal wrote:bayman wrote:Dutchy wrote:Wouldnt read too much into it, 5 day break shouldnt happen in SANFL, esp this time of year, Why wouldnt you play this game on Sunday with no AFL on in town?
crap, we were insipid, woeful & no matter how good your opponent is you should at least match them with desire, committment, determination which we did not...........................................................by the way how did norwood go who also played on monday ?
Disunity amongst our Glenelg barrackers
The 3rd umpire needs to intervene b4 Dutchy and Bayman , dare I say it, implode with each other
5 DAY BREAKS
You would be deluding yourself if you think a 5 day break does not make some difference some of the time
NW made a mockery of the 5 day break with a dominant 2nd half v SA
GL were mauled by CD
So in one game it did, the other it didnt
WHY
GL played a potential premier, in an away game on the Ponderosa
NW played a potential wooden spooner on Burkes Backyard
Forgetting who played who
It is probably harder to play on a BIG oval compared to a sMALl oval with a 5 day break
MIND GAMES
GL couldnt beat CD on thier own Burkes Backyard earlier this season when they were trounced
This after that folklorish effort by CD who were down to about 9 fit players[it will be down to about 3 in years to come]
They played a really tough game against NW 5 days earlier and then had to face an awesome CD outfit
I say there is a real possibility that GL were a beaten side about 90 seconds after the NW game
mal, dutchy was not there, he did not witness a training drill by central & that is what it was, if dutchy is correct tell me why was glenelgs 'best' quarter the last quarter ? whatever the situation is you can at least COMPETE & that DID NOT HAPPEN (apart from todd grima & maybe 1 or 2 more)
by CedeNullis » Sun Jun 19, 2011 12:42 pm
by bulldog2004 » Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:08 pm
HOORAY PUNT wrote:Thanks , I thought you may have come up with something a bit better than that though Deidree . Maybe post a picture , now there is a novel idea for you . Speaking of novel maybe post your thoughts on the game today ,where did Central win it ? Where did the Bays lose it ? You know that kind of stuff. Did you go today ? I heard not many Bay fans went at all , in fact I'm told it was an embarassing turn out from Glenelg fans?
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:18 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:24 pm
The Apostle AK wrote:Anyone know the crowd figure for the match?
by Dogwatcher » Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:54 pm
bulldog2004 wrote:HOORAY PUNT wrote:Thanks , I thought you may have come up with something a bit better than that though Deidree . Maybe post a picture , now there is a novel idea for you . Speaking of novel maybe post your thoughts on the game today ,where did Central win it ? Where did the Bays lose it ? You know that kind of stuff. Did you go today ? I heard not many Bay fans went at all , in fact I'm told it was an embarassing turn out from Glenelg fans?
Weslo helped with the numbers.
by Pseudo » Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:12 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Pseudo wrote:I for one am very happy with the result. Was fearing a total blowout before the game but am glad that Glenelg kept the margin to a respectable level. Onward and upwards Bays!
Wow, you're a glass half full kinda guy aren't ya?
by Grahaml » Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:20 pm
by whufc » Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:33 pm
by whufc » Sun Jun 19, 2011 5:34 pm
by Squawk » Sun Jun 19, 2011 5:59 pm
The Apostle AK wrote:HOORAY PUNT wrote:I heard not many Bay fans went at all , in fact I'm told it was an embarassing turn out from Glenelg fans ?
There was a patch of Glenelg supporters underneath the grandstand and some lurking in the family friendly outer area but apart from that there wasn't a whole lot there...nothing to be embarrassed about...with Norwood's massive match attendances, they seem to have even less turn up to Elizabeth...
The Apostle AK wrote:Great to see plenty of Norwood supporters turn up and with their flags(which I didn't see get used!)
BTW, WHERE HAS ALL THE CENTRAL SUPPORTERS GONE???
by Dutchy » Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:21 pm
whufc wrote:Dutchy, you might want to read the Glenelg vs Central preview thread from the game at the Bay earlier in the year.
I mentioned i thought Central may struggle because they were coming off a short break etc etc.
You were the first one to dismiss this claming i was just making excuses etc etc etc the bays have had to do it before etc etc.
The wheel has turned.
by whufc » Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:25 pm
Dutchy wrote:whufc wrote:Dutchy, you might want to read the Glenelg vs Central preview thread from the game at the Bay earlier in the year.
I mentioned i thought Central may struggle because they were coming off a short break etc etc.
You were the first one to dismiss this claming i was just making excuses etc etc etc the bays have had to do it before etc etc.
The wheel has turned.
That game was correctly programmed as a Sunday game to at least give CD a 6 day break, same thing should of happened this week. And why didnt it? It clashes with local soccer![]()
![]()
by Hazydog » Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:33 pm
Wedgie wrote:Dutchy wrote:Your the one comparing South and Centrals, enough said...
Good point, South have won more flags, and they won them when the comp was a stronger competition relatively speaking!
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:35 pm
by Squawk » Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:44 pm
whufc wrote:Dutchy wrote:whufc wrote:Dutchy, you might want to read the Glenelg vs Central preview thread from the game at the Bay earlier in the year.
I mentioned i thought Central may struggle because they were coming off a short break etc etc.
You were the first one to dismiss this claming i was just making excuses etc etc etc the bays have had to do it before etc etc.
The wheel has turned.
That game was correctly programmed as a Sunday game to at least give CD a 6 day break, same thing should of happened this week. And why didnt it? It clashes with local soccer![]()
![]()
Serious question - is the local soccer season finished by the time SANFL finals are played on Sundays in September and October?
Local soccer does make up a fair portion of the supporter base and would effect our crowds if we were to play games on a Sunday.
Crowd numbers already down we dont need to alienate a group of our current supporter base.
by whufc » Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:47 pm
Squawk wrote:whufc wrote:Dutchy wrote:whufc wrote:Dutchy, you might want to read the Glenelg vs Central preview thread from the game at the Bay earlier in the year.
I mentioned i thought Central may struggle because they were coming off a short break etc etc.
You were the first one to dismiss this claming i was just making excuses etc etc etc the bays have had to do it before etc etc.
The wheel has turned.
That game was correctly programmed as a Sunday game to at least give CD a 6 day break, same thing should of happened this week. And why didnt it? It clashes with local soccer![]()
![]()
Serious question - is the local soccer season finished by the time SANFL finals are played on Sundays in September and October?
Local soccer does make up a fair portion of the supporter base and would effect our crowds if we were to play games on a Sunday.
Crowd numbers already down we dont need to alienate a group of our current supporter base.
by Dogwatcher » Sun Jun 19, 2011 8:17 pm
Pseudo wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Pseudo wrote:I for one am very happy with the result. Was fearing a total blowout before the game but am glad that Glenelg kept the margin to a respectable level. Onward and upwards Bays!
Wow, you're a glass half full kinda guy aren't ya?
My optimism is well founded. It seems that despite the scoreboard, the win was awarded to Glenelg! Look at the ladder on the inside back page of the Sunday Mail. The Bays have 5 wins, 5 losses and a draw (totalling 9 match points), after being 4-5-1 last week. Central must have played with an extra interchange player!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |