Psyber wrote:
I don't like it, which was why I chose to play a less brutal sport myself.
I don't think being pompous is a sport.
by cennals05 » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:41 am
Psyber wrote:
I don't like it, which was why I chose to play a less brutal sport myself.
by CENTURION » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:42 am
cennals05 wrote:Psyber wrote:
I don't like it, which was why I chose to play a less brutal sport myself.
I don't think being pompous is a sport.
by Psyber » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:42 am
Read it again - they do it very well - as did Port Adelaide in the past and the Brisbane Lions!CENTURION wrote:What a load of chosen poppycock. If We are such brutal thugs, how come We are nearly the least reported side? Sure Wingnut cleaned him up, who wouldn't have? He didn't want to break his jaw, that was accidental. Sorry We won the fights too.Psyber wrote:The Phillips issue was predictable - it had to happen to somebody.
Central have long demonstrated that they have learned from the Port Adelaide of old, and from the Brisbane Lions under Leigh Matthews.
They work out the way the Umpires are responding and take every opportunity to push the limits and bruise and wear down the opposition.
I don't blame them because that is the way the "game" is played, and they won fair and square in the terms that apply.
Norwood have needed bruisers too to be successful in the past.
I don't like it, which was why I chose to play a less brutal sport myself.
I'd enjoy Aussie rules more without the focus on "taking out" the opposition.
by Apachebulldog » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:44 am
by Brucetiki » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:45 am
Booney wrote:Any discussion about the bump on Phillips is through ( red and blue ) rose coloured glasses.
Pure and simple Phillips was completely oblivious to the fact that there was any traffic near him at all.
Sadly, the reaction to another GF win by Centrals is, on here, a reflection of the SA Football community's ho-hum reaction to another Dogs win. Dont get me wrong, their achievements are unsurpassed and we must all dip our lids to them.
But aren't we all just sick and tired of it?
by CENTURION » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:46 am
by Psyber » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:47 am
What was pompous about that?cennals05 wrote:I don't think being pompous is a sport.Psyber wrote: I don't like it, which was why I chose to play a less brutal sport myself.
by am Bays » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:48 am
Booney wrote:But aren't we all just sick and tired of it?
by Voice » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:49 am
Booney wrote:Any discussion about the bump on Phillips is through ( red and blue ) rose coloured glasses.
Pure and simple Phillips was completely oblivious to the fact that there was any traffic near him at all.
Sadly, the reaction to another GF win by Centrals is, on here, a reflection of the SA Football community's ho-hum reaction to another Dogs win. Dont get me wrong, their achievements are unsurpassed and we must all dip our lids to them.
But aren't we all just sick and tired of it?
by Brucetiki » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:54 am
CENTURION wrote:Here it comes, now the dust has settled, the whingeing starts. Sorry Constance, Squawk, Topsy, some of your mob............
by The Apostle » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:55 am
by CENTURION » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:56 am
by Voice » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:56 am
The Apostle AK wrote:Updated signature says it all!!!
Always knew that Norwood would die in the arse...
Dogs kicking all those goals in the 3rd quarter after Norwood had Centrals on the ropes at 1/2 quarter time and Norwood kicking 2.5 in the last is what won it for Centrals/lost it for Norwood.
I'm off to the family day.
by The Apostle » Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:02 am
Voice wrote:The Apostle AK wrote:Updated signature says it all!!!
Always knew that Norwood would die in the arse...
Dogs kicking all those goals in the 3rd quarter after Norwood had Centrals on the ropes at 1/2 quarter time and Norwood kicking 2.5 in the last is what won it for Centrals/lost it for Norwood.
I'm off to the family day.
Had a big night AK?![]()
by The Apostle » Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:07 am
by Apachebulldog » Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:10 am
by Brucetiki » Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:15 am
The Apostle AK wrote:Did any Dogs fans who went to the after-party find the security a bit oppressive??? Not the ones in black but the ones in blue??? About a dozen cars, a paddy wagon or three, atleast four ponies and atleast one sniffer dog (I was told there was three there).
by TEX07 » Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:16 am
CENTURION wrote:Well guys, We'll give you a chance next year.MAYBE no more Schell, Spurr, McKenzie, Gowans x 2, Sibenaler, Cochrane, Switala.....excited now?
by Psyber » Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:19 am
I agree. It applies to all the teams Centrals have dominatedam Bays wrote:Nup, and I know I'll get howled down for this and the Glenelg jibes will start, I'm not sick of Centrals winning I'm sick of my lot not rising to the challenge and doing something about it..Booney wrote:But aren't we all just sick and tired of it?
by Dogmatic » Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:21 am
fester69 wrote:A fair hip and shoulder that resulted in Phillips spending last night in hospital having his jaw wired? When was the rule allowing head high contact introduced?
Callinan killed us, got the only holding the ball decision of the day and deserved the Oatey. But if anyone tells me that Central weren't told to take out Flipper then I will call you a liar!!! Simply put Flipper stays on,we win.
My only regret is Norwood don't have a thug in our team to reciprocate.
Sour Grapes? Of course.
Do I care? Of course not.
I watched my team throw away a Premiership yesterday.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |