'Stirling'gate
89 posts
• Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: 'Stirling'gate
by Dogwatcher » Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:24 am
Eureka! I found a photo of Psyber.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
- Dogwatcher
- Coach
-
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
- Location: The Bronx
- Has liked: 1425 times
- Been liked: 1152 times
- Grassroots Team: Elizabeth
Re: 'Stirling'gate
by Dogwatcher » Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:25 am
Is it entirely probable that this thread is off topic?
Deliciously so.
Deliciously so.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
- Dogwatcher
- Coach
-
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
- Location: The Bronx
- Has liked: 1425 times
- Been liked: 1152 times
- Grassroots Team: Elizabeth
Re: 'Stirling'gate
by sjt » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:38 pm
Re: 'Stirling'gate
by Dogwatcher » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:07 pm
The Leading Teams concept would've been introduced by Healy, given Ray McLean's involvement at the CDFC in around 99/00.
Healy would've seen the benefits there.
Given Jawoskyj's (spelling???) comments, it'll be interesting to see if the set-up remains at North next season.
Healy would've seen the benefits there.
Given Jawoskyj's (spelling???) comments, it'll be interesting to see if the set-up remains at North next season.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
- Dogwatcher
- Coach
-
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
- Location: The Bronx
- Has liked: 1425 times
- Been liked: 1152 times
- Grassroots Team: Elizabeth
Re: 'Stirling'gate
by Barto » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:43 pm
Leading Teams; what a load of wank.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
Re: 'Stirling'gate
by smac » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:37 pm
Barto wrote:Leading Teams; what a load of wank.
Righto, I'll make sure Centrals drop the concept then. It has had no bearing whatsoever in the change in culture at the club over the last 20 years. Glad you've let us know, we can stop wasting our time and money now.
Re: 'Stirling'gate
by sjt » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:47 pm
Many believe it works, many believe it doesn't. Premiership teams have had it in place and some haven't. Sorry not SANFL related, but I thought some of Akermanis's views on it seemed reasonable. Would largely depend on the actual leadership at a club, personalities involved and reaction to criticism (I would think).
Re: 'Stirling'gate
by Barto » Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:45 am
sjt wrote:Many believe it works, many believe it doesn't. Premiership teams have had it in place and some haven't. Sorry not SANFL related, but I thought some of Akermanis's views on it seemed reasonable. Would largely depend on the actual leadership at a club, personalities involved and reaction to criticism (I would think).
Exactly. It's exclusionary by nature.
Newman nailed it when he talked about "amateur psychologists".
It's all the SANFL's fault.
89 posts
• Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Football SANFL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests
Advertisements by Advertisement Management