Voice wrote:Surprised you didn't pick up on the fact that there is 119 pages. Very relevant number for your Cats and for Port.
It was deliberate on my behalf mate.
Saved ??
87 posts
• Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: Saved ??
by Wedgie » Sat Feb 13, 2010 10:58 am
It was deliberate on my behalf mate.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
-
Wedgie - Site Admin
-
- Posts: 51721
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
- Has liked: 2153 times
- Been liked: 4093 times
- Grassroots Team: Noarlunga
Re: Saved ??
by UK Fan » Sat Feb 13, 2010 10:59 am
Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:I know who has my backing in this war between the two Ports and its not those with a gay shade of turquoise that lose grand finals by almost 20 goals, its the club that has tradition, spirit and over 30 premierships.
Very selective,is your memory.
Yoda ????
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
Re: Saved ??
by Mic » Sat Feb 13, 2010 11:08 am
Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:I know who has my backing in this war between the two Ports and its not those with a gay shade of turquoise that lose grand finals by almost 20 goals, its the club that has tradition, spirit and over 30 premierships.
Or win Grand Finals by 7 goals to stop a might powerful team achieveing 4 in a row? Very selective,is your memory.
They had a few opportunities to do that in the previous years.
Re: Saved ??
by Booney » Sat Feb 13, 2010 11:12 am
Mic wrote:Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:I know who has my backing in this war between the two Ports and its not those with a gay shade of turquoise that lose grand finals by almost 20 goals, its the club that has tradition, spirit and over 30 premierships.
Or win Grand Finals by 7 goals to stop a might powerful team achieveing 4 in a row? Very selective,is your memory.
They had a few opportunities to do that in the previous years.
True. very true. ( thanks for the reminder )
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
Re: Saved ??
by zipzap » Sat Feb 13, 2010 11:14 am
am Bays wrote:I think the Apostle beat me to the assertion though...
I think it was alluded to on the first page of this thread, but play on...
"A no vote from any club means there is some sort of risk involved in our entry into the competition not working," Steven Trigg.
Re: Saved ??
by Voice » Sat Feb 13, 2010 11:35 am
Wedgie wrote:Voice wrote:Surprised you didn't pick up on the fact that there is 119 pages. Very relevant number for your Cats and for Port.
It was deliberate on my behalf mate.
Bummer. It would have been funnier if it was a co-incidence, eg. the fact that the Power cheer squad sit in bay 119 at FP.
-
Voice - League - Best 21
-
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:24 am
- Location: :noitacoL
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
- Grassroots Team: Kenilworth
Re: Saved ??
by Mr Irate » Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:09 pm
Saved ?? Not looking that way after the article in the paper today......more money wanted from the SANFL.......we seem to be getting into a game of "pass the blame baton" for when the magpies get wound up.......
"This windfall from the Adelaide Oval decision cannot be turned into a moment when the SANFL sells off the farm to underwrite its lazy league clubs."
-
Mr Irate - Reserves
-
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 12:54 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
87 posts
• Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Football SANFL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: arthur and 32 guests
Advertisements by Advertisement Management