by Harry the Horse » Mon Jun 10, 2013 12:51 pm
by Cambridge Clarrie » Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:04 pm
by kickinit » Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:06 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Can someone explain to me how much better off all the clubs will be financially if Crows/Power get teams in the SANFL league?
by Harry the Horse » Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:08 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Can someone explain to me how much better off all the clubs will be financially if Crows/Power get teams in the SANFL league?
by whufc » Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:09 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Can someone explain to me how much better off all the clubs will be financially if Crows/Power get teams in the SANFL league?
by Reddeer » Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:18 pm
by Cambridge Clarrie » Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:21 pm
Reddeer wrote:Apparently it keeps Port in the competition and gets rid of the bye are two major items.
So much for the destruction of the comp and watching years of Port v Crows Grand Finals.
Even though this is expected not to happen as the teams will have so many weak top up players . Oh Yeah!!!
My support of the Crows is waning, back to my original Essendon I think
by Reddeer » Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:25 pm
by Dutchy » Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:36 pm
Reddeer wrote:Apparently it keeps Port in the competition and gets rid of the bye are two major items.
So much for the destruction of the comp and watching years of Port v Crows Grand Finals.
Even though this is expected not to happen as the teams will have so many weak top up players . Oh Yeah!!!
My support of the Crows is waning, back to my original Essendon I think
by UK Fan » Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:38 pm
Dutchy wrote:Reddeer wrote:Apparently it keeps Port in the competition and gets rid of the bye are two major items.
So much for the destruction of the comp and watching years of Port v Crows Grand Finals.
Even though this is expected not to happen as the teams will have so many weak top up players . Oh Yeah!!!
My support of the Crows is waning, back to my original Essendon I think
Getting rid of the bye is a reason for those desperate for reasons, while not ideal when it happened I reckon its now great for the comp to have a bye every 8 weeks, players love it also. Even the AFL have brought the bye in.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by whufc » Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:40 pm
UK Fan wrote:Dutchy wrote:Reddeer wrote:Apparently it keeps Port in the competition and gets rid of the bye are two major items.
So much for the destruction of the comp and watching years of Port v Crows Grand Finals.
Even though this is expected not to happen as the teams will have so many weak top up players . Oh Yeah!!!
My support of the Crows is waning, back to my original Essendon I think
Getting rid of the bye is a reason for those desperate for reasons, while not ideal when it happened I reckon its now great for the comp to have a bye every 8 weeks, players love it also. Even the AFL have brought the bye in.
X2
by Barto » Mon Jun 10, 2013 2:08 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Can someone explain to me how much better off all the clubs will be financially if Crows/Power get teams in the SANFL league?
by Barto » Mon Jun 10, 2013 2:10 pm
whufc wrote:UK Fan wrote:Dutchy wrote:Reddeer wrote:Apparently it keeps Port in the competition and gets rid of the bye are two major items.
So much for the destruction of the comp and watching years of Port v Crows Grand Finals.
Even though this is expected not to happen as the teams will have so many weak top up players . Oh Yeah!!!
My support of the Crows is waning, back to my original Essendon I think
Getting rid of the bye is a reason for those desperate for reasons, while not ideal when it happened I reckon its now great for the comp to have a bye every 8 weeks, players love it also. Even the AFL have brought the bye in.
X2
X3
The players LUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUV it!!!!!!!
by CENTURION » Mon Jun 10, 2013 2:12 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 10, 2013 2:45 pm
Barto wrote:whufc wrote:UK Fan wrote:Dutchy wrote:[quote="Reddeer"]Apparently it keeps Port in the competition and gets rid of the bye are two major items.
So much for the destruction of the comp and watching years of Port v Crows Grand Finals.
Even though this is expected not to happen as the teams will have so many weak top up players . Oh Yeah!!!
My support of the Crows is waning, back to my original Essendon I think
Getting rid of the bye is a reason for those desperate for reasons, while not ideal when it happened I reckon its now great for the comp to have a bye every 8 weeks, players love it also. Even the AFL have brought the bye in.
X2
X3
The players LUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUV it!!!!!!!
by whufc » Mon Jun 10, 2013 2:49 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:06 pm
whufc wrote:UK Fan wrote:Dutchy wrote:Reddeer wrote:Apparently it keeps Port in the competition and gets rid of the bye are two major items.
So much for the destruction of the comp and watching years of Port v Crows Grand Finals.
Even though this is expected not to happen as the teams will have so many weak top up players . Oh Yeah!!!
My support of the Crows is waning, back to my original Essendon I think
Getting rid of the bye is a reason for those desperate for reasons, while not ideal when it happened I reckon its now great for the comp to have a bye every 8 weeks, players love it also. Even the AFL have brought the bye in.
X2
X3
The players LUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUV it!!!!!!!
by SANFLnut » Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:12 pm
by kickinit » Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:21 pm
SANFLnut wrote:I wonder if the "One Club" arrangement over the last couple of years will form part of the SANFL's discussions with the clubs? Seems that the Magpies-Power relationship has advanced beyond the boundaries of what was agreed by the clubs. This has been largely unaddressed/unpunished to this point. Port are now going to go to the other eight clubs and ask for a big favour and in doing so make a number of commitments about how they will conduct their team. Hysterical references to 1990 etc. are not relevant IMHO, however the last couple of years certainly are. Hope this is raised and openly debated.
by on the rails » Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:28 pm
kickinit wrote:SANFLnut wrote:I wonder if the "One Club" arrangement over the last couple of years will form part of the SANFL's discussions with the clubs? Seems that the Magpies-Power relationship has advanced beyond the boundaries of what was agreed by the clubs. This has been largely unaddressed/unpunished to this point. Port are now going to go to the other eight clubs and ask for a big favour and in doing so make a number of commitments about how they will conduct their team. Hysterical references to 1990 etc. are not relevant IMHO, however the last couple of years certainly are. Hope this is raised and openly debated.
what should be raised and debated is how the SANFL clubs where stupid enough to allow it to happen. Hopefully this time those same people are smart enough to have any stipulations put in writing instead of just words.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |