Salary Cap Issues - Norwood, West & Port

[dedja]

stay on topic Booney ...

[Fricky]

Don't me Son ...

Keep out of it and get that defence ready for salary cap rorting ... and maybe get a new piss-o-meter

Norwood werent over the salary cap DJ, just forgot to lodge some papers .

[dedja]

I know, but it's too much fun to keep stoking the embers ...

[Brodlach]

I know, but it's too much fun to keep stoking the embers ...

You call yours " the embers"?

[dedja]

there's no ' r ' ... good humour attempt though, I nearly giggled

[Brodlach]

there's no ' r ' ... good humour attempt though, I nearly giggled

[SANFLnut]

Lots more to come on the Norwood front. Have had it confirmed by an impeccable source that Norwood have submitted several deliberately false contracts to the SANFL. The story that Norwood are trying to spin about Mcguinness' adjustment being lodged incorrectly is just a smokescreen to try and explain it away.

Expect book to be thrown at them as it is not their first breach in recent times. Unfortunate for SANFL as it leaves them open to criticism for having a tainted premier.

[topsywaldron]

Lots more to come on the Norwood front. Have had it confirmed by an impeccable source that Norwood have submitted several deliberately false contracts to the SANFL. The story that Norwood are trying to spin about Mcguinness' adjustment being lodged incorrectly is just a smokescreen to try and explain it away.

Expect book to be thrown at them as it is not their first breach in recent times. Unfortunate for SANFL as it leaves them open to criticism for having a tainted premier.

Is your source Bunton?

[Jimmy_041]

Two in 20 years, us Pies are doin' ok.

And when was the last one before that?

3 in 40 years ... the Bays are doing alright

4 premierships in 92 years
Yeah real well

[CENTURION]

Lots more to come on the Norwood front. Have had it confirmed by an impeccable source that Norwood have submitted several deliberately false contracts to the SANFL. The story that Norwood are trying to spin about Mcguinness' adjustment being lodged incorrectly is just a smokescreen to try and explain it away.

Expect book to be thrown at them as it is not their first breach in recent times. Unfortunate for SANFL as it leaves them open to criticism for having a tainted premier.

I heard the same thing yesterday.

[Apachebulldog]

Cheats !

[The Apostle]

Lots more to come on the Norwood front. Have had it confirmed by an impeccable source that Norwood have submitted several deliberately false contracts to the SANFL. The story that Norwood are trying to spin about Mcguinness' adjustment being lodged incorrectly is just a smokescreen to try and explain it away.

Expect book to be thrown at them as it is not their first breach in recent times. Unfortunate for SANFL as it leaves them open to criticism for having a tainted premier.

I heard the same thing yesterday.

Same here too. The SANFL has all the evidence they need and they just given Norwood to the 25th of March to stew on their own juices. Considering that Norwood haven't fessed up to it and have just flogged it off as a minor thing I expect the SANFL to hammer Norwood hard. I fully expect Norwood to lose bulk coin and have recruiting restrictions imposed on them.

[whufc]

Whose at fault for all these leaks, everyone is getting these stories and so far they have seemed to be pretty much around the mark.

What's going on at SANFL HQ

[Psyber]

Lots more to come on the Norwood front. Have had it confirmed by an impeccable source that Norwood have submitted several deliberately false contracts to the SANFL. The story that Norwood are trying to spin about Mcguinness' adjustment being lodged incorrectly is just a smokescreen to try and explain it away.

Expect book to be thrown at them as it is not their first breach in recent times. Unfortunate for SANFL as it leaves them open to criticism for having a tainted premier.

It appears nothing is established and no fine has been issued, and that so far the only concern is paperwork about the contract of one player (presumably McGuinness).
The $50K is a maximum fine if there is to even be one once the paper work is examined..
From the SANFL site: http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/1950/

The Investigation Committee highlighted concerns relating to the memorandum of payments submitted to the SANFL in both March and October 2012, which in their belief does not include the total extent of contractual benefits provided to one NFC player.

[whufc]

I haven't read through every post BUT

Has the SANFL (not Norwood) officially said this was just an admin error and not a deliberate breach.

[SDK]

Yep.

[Ian]

where?

When?

I can only recall Norwood saying that

[SDK]

The SANFL they never said Norwood exceeded the salary cap.

[whufc]

The SANFL they never said Norwood exceeded the salary cap.

The SANFL have said Norwood 'breached' salary cap rules, the breach wasnt exceeding the salary cap but there is a breach of some form.

Norwood are saying the breach was nothing more than an admin error, but they also denied they were even under investigation.

Have they said that this 'breach' is just purely an admin error or a deliberate 'breach', surely this will make a huge difference in the penalty handed down.

What im also getting at is that if the SANFL have officially come out and said its nothing more than an accidental admin error then that puts an end to the latest rumours on this site.

[Ian]

The SANFL they never said Norwood exceeded the salary cap.

Have they actually said they didn't?