National 2nd Tier Competiton Discussion

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby CENTURION » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:17 am

dedja wrote:
Dutchy wrote:We talking 1991? :?



Steve Sims ... all class. :roll:

typical North.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby DOC » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:19 am

CENTURION wrote:
DOC wrote:But not many others . Weak as urine.

sorry but We'll stick to the important things......like trying to win Premierships in The SANFL, after all, isn't that what it's all about?


Winning what?
User avatar
DOC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19282
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:15 pm
Has liked: 861 times
Been liked: 2340 times

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby DOC » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:25 am

Now I'm in trouble, just read Cornseys column.
User avatar
DOC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19282
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:15 pm
Has liked: 861 times
Been liked: 2340 times

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby mr o » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:30 am

I thought i would never say this in my life time, but i have to agree with graham cornes collem in the advertiser today.Lets go back to when we didnt have the bye and we were playing escort cup preseason, thats how it is meant to be people, remember, the bye is there because of two sides merging, not because we whant it there.For some of the top sides this week to come out and say that they need the bye to rest their players in the quest for a premiship at the end of the season is laughable.Are these top sides that are in our comp saying , they are not as strong as teams from twenty and thirty years ago because they need the bye to rest up there players, i hope not.In the words of graham cornes in this weeks saturday advertiser, HARDEN THE #UCK UP.
User avatar
mr o
Member
 
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 6:42 pm
Location: Mnt Gambier
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby CENTURION » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:32 am

mr o wrote:I thought i would never say this in my life time, but i have to agree with graham cornes collem in the advertiser today.Lets go back to when we didnt have the bye and we were playing escort cup preseason, thats how it is meant to be people, remember, the bye is there because of two sides merging, not because we whant it there.For some of the top sides this week to come out and say that they need the bye to rest their players in the quest for a premiship at the end of the season is laughable.Are these top sides that are in our comp saying , they are not as strong as teams from twenty and thirty years ago because they need the bye to rest up there players, i hope not.In the words of graham cornes in this weeks saturday advertiser, HARDEN THE #UCK UP.


footy is a lot more intense these days, they train harder & for longer plus there is far more on the line.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby CENTURION » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:42 am

I came to play for Centrals, to play in the quest for a SANFL Premiership, no other reason (maybe to get better at footy & have a crack at making it into The AFL). For the Club &/or the SANFL to change my job description half way through my contract is not what I set out to do in the first place & totally unacceptable.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby auto » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:57 am

Agree...weak as piss Central, Norwood etc etc.
User avatar
auto
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2803
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 9:49 am
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 29 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby CENTURION » Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:00 am

automaticwicky wrote:Agree...weak as piss Central, Norwood etc etc.

no worries, you battle it out for the spoon, We'll battle it out for The Flag.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby Hopeful Jelly » Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:17 am

mr o wrote:I thought i would never say this in my life time, but i have to agree with graham cornes collem in the advertiser today.Lets go back to when we didnt have the bye and we were playing escort cup preseason, thats how it is meant to be people, remember, the bye is there because of two sides merging, not because we whant it there.For some of the top sides this week to come out and say that they need the bye to rest their players in the quest for a premiship at the end of the season is laughable.Are these top sides that are in our comp saying , they are not as strong as teams from twenty and thirty years ago because they need the bye to rest up there players, i hope not.In the words of graham cornes in this weeks saturday advertiser, HARDEN THE #UCK UP.

It's alright to include the Escort Cup, playing midweek, etc, etc in the argument but the facts are that when this was occurring it was the same situation for all teams - no teams were disadvantaged.

If you made the Champions League a preseason competition I think you may find a different response from some of those teams that have declined their invitation.

His argument is very much based in the 1980's when things were different ... shown by his reference to WWT as Woodville. :roll:
Hopeful Jelly
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 4:41 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 14 times

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby DOC » Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:22 am

Jim05 wrote:Yep trying to wrestle the title from the dogs is a much bigger priority than playing a bunch of scrubbers.
Our u18's would wipe the floor with half the sides in this comp.


So why not play them?
User avatar
DOC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19282
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:15 pm
Has liked: 861 times
Been liked: 2340 times

Re: National 2nd Tier Competiton Discussion

Postby Hopeful Jelly » Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:32 am

PhilH wrote:Hi Jas

I could be wrong ... but hard to see logistically how the SANFL can finalise a schedule until it knows when North Port & West need their byes to play in the champions league.

There was already a reported draft schedule issued that allocated games with the AFL Matches. Replace Central with Port to give them that Magpies / Power doubleheader v Ainslie.

Then send West to Sydney, North to Brisbane or vice versa ..... then let us get on with our league schedules.

My guess is that West/North/Port would replace Central/Norwood/Eagles respectively as it seemed that the games were worked out based on rankings in their respective competitions.

If I recall correctly, the SCG game versus East Coast Eagles that Port would play is prior to Sydney vs Power so the AFL would be quite happy with how that worked out.
Hopeful Jelly
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 4:41 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 14 times

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby EasyE » Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:46 am

Hopeful Jelly wrote:His argument is very much based in the 1980's when things were different ... shown by his reference to WWT as Woodville. :roll:


The 1980's was probably the last time his opinion on anything SANFL related was relevant.

"The football gods have a habit of noticing things like this." I'd love to see the evidence to support that claim, Graham? Unless of course that when he is referring to the football gods he means Demetriou, Anderson and Murdoch!
User avatar
EasyE
Member
 
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:17 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: National 2nd Tier Competiton Discussion

Postby ORDoubleBlues » Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:04 pm

FWIW I completely agree with the comments of Andy Collins in yesterday's Advertiser and I'm not sure why the byes of the clubs involved couldn't be concentrated around the period of when this competition occurs to avoid burnout, etc.
R.I.P. Patrice Lumumba 1925 - 1961
User avatar
ORDoubleBlues
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Wisanger

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby mr o » Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:04 pm

I think its great disopointment not to see the best in our comp stand up to the best in the wafl and vfl. with centrals being so dominent for so long, surly centrals supporters must have some interest to see if their game plain can match it with the best from interstate.As a supporter of westies, i know i would like to see that
User avatar
mr o
Member
 
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 6:42 pm
Location: Mnt Gambier
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby once_were_warriors » Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:25 pm

mr o wrote:I thought i would never say this in my life time, but i have to agree with graham cornes collem in the advertiser today.Lets go back to when we didnt have the bye and we were playing escort cup preseason, thats how it is meant to be people, remember, the bye is there because of two sides merging, not because we whant it there.For some of the top sides this week to come out and say that they need the bye to rest their players in the quest for a premiship at the end of the season is laughable.Are these top sides that are in our comp saying , they are not as strong as teams from twenty and thirty years ago because they need the bye to rest up there players, i hope not.In the words of graham cornes in this weeks saturday advertiser, HARDEN THE #UCK UP.



Look at it the other way the 3 teams playing in the Murdoch Cup potentially play 4 more games , whilst the 6 other SANFL teams don't.
You can't tell me playing 4 additional games won't have an impact.
If at first you don't succeed , then destroy all evidence that you tried in the first place
once_were_warriors
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: under Scoreboard Woody Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: National 2nd Tier Competiton Discussion

Postby holden78 » Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:50 pm

Wedgie , its a sure sign of desperation and a lack of genuine belief in your future prospects ( ha ha ) when you have to wheel out the tired old history lessons to everyone . Simply the clubs with REAL focus for 2011 arent going to dance for Vlad the Shafter , unless its for the same reason as what makes the whole GAYFL circus turn .... $$$$$$$ right ! Everyone wants and should be rewarded for their work , especially when its an obvious one off ! And whats with taking all our one dimensional back up ruckmen , thought you would have had a guts full of the last one ;)
holden78
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1945
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:43 am
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 55 times

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby Hondo » Sat Dec 18, 2010 1:24 pm

once_were_warriors wrote:Look at it the other way the 3 teams playing in the Murdoch Cup potentially play 4 more games , whilst the 6 other SANFL teams don't.
You can't tell me playing 4 additional games won't have an impact.


It's not that long ago we played 22 games per season compared to the current 20. AFL teams play 22 games per season. Back in the day there were also 2 state games, Escort cup games during the week and SANFL teams played in the VFL night series.

So I'm not convinced that doing what players did 20+ years ago before the science of sports fitness was so advanced is a convincing argument. The argument is that the competition from other state's teams will be weak so, if so, it's a great training run. It's also a chance for supporters to travel interstate as a group with the players.

Once one of the top 3 teams jumped then their nearest competitors for the 2011 really had no choice. If there was no foxtel comp, I wonder if they would all put out a joint press release (bar Glenelg - kudos for being able to speak for yourselves :o ) to "announce" that they didn't think it was appropriate that players from the top 5 teams play state football anymore. Would their supporters be as strong in their support of their clubs decision then?

I respect the clubs' decision but to hear some of the supporters now out and about parrotting their club CEO's and now dismissing the sort of comp many had previously called for is getting my goat a bit.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby Mickyj » Sat Dec 18, 2010 1:48 pm

CENTURION wrote:
DOC wrote:But not many others . Weak as urine.

sorry but We'll stick to the important things......like trying to win Premierships in The SANFL, after all, isn't that what it's all about?


As will the Eagles .Let the lower teams go forth and weaken themselves in this Champions league .
My understanding seeing this thread was started by a south Fan .South are really upset they could not play in it !!
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby Mickyj » Sat Dec 18, 2010 1:53 pm

EasyE wrote:
Hopeful Jelly wrote:His argument is very much based in the 1980's when things were different ... shown by his reference to WWT as Woodville. :roll:


The 1980's was probably the last time his opinion on anything SANFL related was relevant.

"The football gods have a habit of noticing things like this." I'd love to see the evidence to support that claim, Graham? Unless of course that when he is referring to the football gods he means Demetriou, Anderson and Murdoch!


Its hard to take Graham Cornes seriously as a football commentator .He only runs down the WWTFC .Just look back to 2006 him and his mate KG were having kittens over the jumper we wore to win the flag.

And that summer fill in Wilde is so far up the afl's backside he need a snorkel to breathe!!!

No club sposnors on jumper !!!
$40'000 prize money to the winning team .Just pays for players and support staff.
What happens to injured SANFL players interstate ? How are they cared for how do they come back to Adelaide .And who would pay for it all !!!
Cornes come on man give us the Answer your mr know everything.
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: North and West have a bit of ticker

Postby SDK » Sat Dec 18, 2010 1:56 pm

Just bought some Christmas presents, AFL puppets in the shape of West Adelaide and North Adelaide morons !
SDK
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 51 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: wedgetail and 31 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |