by smac » Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:53 am
by TroyGFC » Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:04 am
by Benchwarmer » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:01 am
by FlyingHigh » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:09 am
by Pseudo » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:22 am
TroyGFC wrote:I think the "Your Shout!" section should be a good read next week.
by Benchwarmer » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:24 am
by TroyGFC » Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:15 pm
Pseudo wrote:TroyGFC wrote:I think the "Your Shout!" section should be a good read next week.
So your reaction to this moron is to buy the damn newspaper?!?
Treat it with the contempt it deserves.
by pipers » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:24 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:We're quick to give Rucci "Brickbats" on this site, in most cases warranted, but he deserves "Bouquets" too: case in point the footnote in his artice today on KG and the Hall of Fame:
<snip>
Full article: http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,22129972-21546,00.html
BTW KG is a long last behind those august names and behind G Phillips too, IMO
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:37 pm
by am Bays » Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:29 pm
fatalberton wrote:I don't know about a long way... KG umpired in the days when there was one central umpire and has been a constant in the media since he hung up his whistle, with his 5:30 "KG's Footy Show" being compulsory viewing when I was a kid. He can be a peanut sometimes, but generally is pretty correct in what he says. His passion for footy is unquestionable, and while he often gets criticised for not paying the SANFL too much attention, you can't really expect him to when he is paid by 5AA and Ch 9 (?) who don't give it much coverage themselves.
He would be a worthy HoF'er in my view.
And he is humble too...
by Aerie » Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:58 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:We're quick to give Rucci "Brickbats" on this site, in most cases warranted, but he deserves "Bouquets" too: case in point the footnote in his artice today on KG and the Hall of Fame:
by heater31 » Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:56 pm
Aerie wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:We're quick to give Rucci "Brickbats" on this site, in most cases warranted, but he deserves "Bouquets" too: case in point the footnote in his artice today on KG and the Hall of Fame:
Perhaps I'm cynical, but surely this is all staged. Fjeldstad being the sacraficial lamb to get talk and Rucci some popularity. Wouldn't surprise me if Rucci helped pen Fjeldstad's work.
by bayman » Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:31 pm
by pipers » Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:41 pm
bayman wrote:maybe the boys at 5rph can get him on & ask why ? then barrell him with the truth, especially d.smith after all he played in the 70's & 80's & jesper would probably not know that
how could a parent call a child jesper ? it sounds like caspers sister![]()
![]()
by fly » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:03 pm
by bayman » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:08 pm
fly wrote:Have met Jesper tried to talk sensibly with him about footy he is clueless about all aspects of the game absolutely no idea. In short dont get upset by a fool with no real grip on the game.
by pipers » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:13 pm
bayman wrote:fly wrote:Have met Jesper tried to talk sensibly with him about footy he is clueless about all aspects of the game absolutely no idea. In short dont get upset by a fool with no real grip on the game.
well if this is correct & i believe you how then how the hell can he write on it ? (not just last weeks article either)
by fly » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:21 pm
by silent hour » Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:45 am
fly wrote:Rucci, Feldstad a good combination clearly the worst footy journos in the land.The Advertiser/Mail is the sporting joke of the nation when it comes to writing about footy.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |