The Legs finished far superior than the rest in 2012.
My hard earned money will be on the Redlegs.

by Dog_ger » Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:45 pm
by bulldogproud2 » Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:50 pm
by wildcat » Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:35 am
Booney wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:topsywaldron wrote:No, what's really funny is a Glenelg fan still looking at an SANFL website in September.
![]()
![]()
etc etc
theres nothing wrong with dreaming about being as good as centrals
Aim higher though, like 36 premierships high.
by udogs01 » Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:18 am
by passionatelegsfan » Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:27 pm
by topsywaldron » Wed Sep 19, 2012 3:13 pm
udogs01 wrote:Sorry folks but it would be a tradegy for the SANFL for either of these teams to win the premiership.............both play such boring footy. If it's not he Dogs this year then I would hope it's Norths, at least there is some element of entertainment in their style of play.
by maccad » Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:59 pm
by udogs01 » Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:05 pm
maccad wrote:norwood 254 goals 222 behinds, one loose man in defence centrals 271 195 west well i did not bother looking at their goals but on sunday they had a 9 man backline we played central twice this year and won by 20 and 23 point and in both games won comfortably but did not kick straight. yes we we play a defensive style but our whole game is not based on either side not scoring i think you are getting our poor conversion mixed up with defensive mindset. you should do your research before making biased decisions.
by legsman » Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:12 pm
udogs01 wrote:maccad wrote:norwood 254 goals 222 behinds, one loose man in defence centrals 271 195 west well i did not bother looking at their goals but on sunday they had a 9 man backline we played central twice this year and won by 20 and 23 point and in both games won comfortably but did not kick straight. yes we we play a defensive style but our whole game is not based on either side not scoring i think you are getting our poor conversion mixed up with defensive mindset. you should do your research before making biased decisions.
Don't need to research, it's my opinion not a decision.
by CENTURION » Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:16 pm
legsman wrote:udogs01 wrote:maccad wrote:norwood 254 goals 222 behinds, one loose man in defence centrals 271 195 west well i did not bother looking at their goals but on sunday they had a 9 man backline we played central twice this year and won by 20 and 23 point and in both games won comfortably but did not kick straight. yes we we play a defensive style but our whole game is not based on either side not scoring i think you are getting our poor conversion mixed up with defensive mindset. you should do your research before making biased decisions.
Don't need to research, it's my opinion not a decision.
Spoken like a true feral
by MatteeG » Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:24 pm
udogs01 wrote:Sorry folks but it would be a tradegy for the SANFL for either of these teams to win the premiership.............both play such boring footy. If it's not the Dogs this year then I would hope it's Norths, at least there is some element of entertainment in their style of play.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by leggies » Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:54 pm
MatteeG wrote:
But I'll forgive some of you because no doubt some posters here have never experienced a losing (minor) final before....lucky bastards
by sjt » Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:58 pm
leggies wrote:MatteeG wrote:
But I'll forgive some of you because no doubt some posters here have never experienced a losing (minor) final before....lucky bastards
Is that because they only got on the wagon when they started winning flags and never knew that they were in the competition in 84, 88, 89, 95 etc?
by gossipgirl » Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:04 pm
udogs01 wrote:Sorry folks but it would be a tradegy for the SANFL for either of these teams to win the premiership.............both play such boring footy. If it's not the Dogs this year then I would hope it's Norths, at least there is some element of entertainment in their style of play.
by fish » Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:21 pm
by bulldogproud2 » Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:31 pm
gossipgirl wrote:udogs01 wrote:Sorry folks but it would be a tradegy for the SANFL for either of these teams to win the premiership.............both play such boring footy. If it's not the Dogs this year then I would hope it's Norths, at least there is some element of entertainment in their style of play.
Obviously not watched the Dogs for the last 10 years. Very ironic a centrals fan complaining about boring footy. The reality is if it wins games like the doggies have for years then it doesnt really matter.
by MatteeG » Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:54 pm
bulldogproud2 wrote:The difference between the Central game plan and the Norwood and West game plans is that Central have never had a game plan that revolved around stacking numbers into defence.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by bulldogproud2 » Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:16 pm
MatteeG wrote:bulldogproud2 wrote:The difference between the Central game plan and the Norwood and West game plans is that Central have never had a game plan that revolved around stacking numbers into defence.
Rubbish. You blokes just flooded better than the rest.
by leggies » Thu Sep 20, 2012 8:47 pm
bulldogproud2 wrote:MatteeG wrote:bulldogproud2 wrote:The difference between the Central game plan and the Norwood and West game plans is that Central have never had a game plan that revolved around stacking numbers into defence.
Rubbish. You blokes just flooded better than the rest.
Spoken from a supporter of the team that brought flooding to the SANFL![]()
Honestly, Central have rarely employed flooding tactics. They have pretty much always backed themselves in to beat their opposition without relying on it.
Cheers
by Jim05 » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:23 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |