Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

[staritski]

North played the worse half of SANFL football i have seen in the 25 years i have watched SANFL football

I have seen North serve up loads of disgraceful crap football in quarters, halves and full matches in my time following them but for you to make that comment even allowing for the fact that you have some issues when you drink too much and post crap but that comment takes the cake!

Did you sleep through the Havelberg goal fest when you beat Norwood by 160 points a few years back? Norwood served up a better half that day than North today?

Your comment doesn't exactly do justice to your own team then given how dominant for 11 years they have been but they couldn't thrash a record score against a team who played the worst half of SANFL football for 25 years.

BTW - I can remember a game in 1975 where your team conceded 49 goals - I wonder how you would have assessed that?

Time to think about posting sober or learning how to be a gracious winner?

Saved me from posting something similar, on the rails.
whufc, you are going to reap what you have sown.
Just because you can type, doesn't mean you know anything about football.

Thanks you said it nicer than i would , whufc you basically just post crap week in week out and expect people not to pick you up on it .

Hear Hear!

[The Apostle]

Tom Dunne reported for Central - those that saw it, what do you think, will he get a game(s)?

It won't make the tribunal...

[The Sleeping Giant]

I'd advise him to plead guilty.

[The Sleeping Giant]

Tosser !! spend some time posting sober you little dweeb !!

Geez its getting easy to stir up the same few each week.

For all my crap posts you will never see me abusing other posters or taking their personal life etc etc into account.

Thats cool though keep up the insighful thoughts of what you saw at the football.

North first quarter was a debacle, Central should have been 10 goals up but we were nearly as bad.

As i said we play like that next week Norwood will beat us by 10 goals.

My advice would be give yourself 24hrs before you post. No need to jump on here with a skin full and angry.

Also try and find another "troll topic". Your constant snipes at James Allan are getting tiresome, and not even remotely funny any more. If Allan wins another MM this year, save yourself posting comments. I'll post them for you.

[sjt]

M westhoff should be back in two weeks.

[Jim05]

Central just get the job done time after time and i expect the same this week. Those saying they will lose to Norwood by 10 goals are kidding arent they? They will lift this week, should be a cracker and with no AFL in Adelaide on Saturday should get a decent crowd

[whufc]

Was told by a mate who was with a Central league player last night that Lairdy didnt let the players sing the club song after the game and took them straight into the meeting room.

Can anyone confirm or deny!

[The Apostle]

M westhoff should be back in two weeks.

What is going on with him??? There's been rumours on here and elsewhere saying that he's leaving Centrals but, at the last 2 matches at the Playmander, he's been sighted at either the 1/4 or 3/4 time huddles. Doesn't come across to me as a player who wants to leave. Injured???

[The Sleeping Giant]

Was told by a mate who was with a Central league player last night that Lairdy didnt let the players sing the club song after the game and took them straight into the meeting room.

Can anyone confirm or deny!

What a spoil sport.

[sjt]

M westhoff should be back in two weeks.

What is going on with him??? There's been rumours on here and elsewhere saying that he's leaving Centrals but, at the last 2 matches at the Playmander, he's been sighted at either the 1/4 or 3/4 time huddles. Doesn't come across to me as a player who wants to leave. Injured???

Recovering from hammy, nothing else.

[CedeNullis]

Was told by a mate who was with a Central league player last night that Lairdy didnt let the players sing the club song after the game and took them straight into the meeting room.

Can anyone confirm or deny!

Don't know whufc, but wouldn't be surprised if that did happen. Roy would not have been happy with our lack of pressure on North in the 2nd and 3rd Quarters.

[Dogwatcher]

That's great. North nearly beat the top side, yet I think 1 Centrals supporter has given North any credit.

TSG, you are a troll and no less.
In the first two pages of this thread all you’ve done is look to pick a ‘fight’.
Nowhere on the first two pages have I seen you comment on why you thought North Adelaide were so bloody good and ran the premier right to the line.
Actually, I haven’t seen any North supporters do that in the first two pages.
All of these posts were made prior to you claiming “only one supporter has given North credit”.
Sadly, due to the nature of your posts, neither have you. It’s up to YOU to give credit for your side’s performance, not the opposition supporters.

Today's match also showed North will probably be one of the best wooden spoon sides in the competition's history. They are not that bad (certainly not in the calibre of South last year or the North side of 2003), they just lack that winning instinct.

North played well. Good run from the backline. Missed a couple of easy goals. I didn't think centrals played that badly. Glad to get the win. The umps bought the crowd into the game.

Centrals didn't play well today and North didn't let them. They ran the ball better from the backlines.

North very impressive in the second half with Alleway outstanding. Took the game on by playing on at all costs and had players running and creating options. The Dogs run stopped and in the end they were lucky to win as either side were a chance with minutes remaining.

[Dogwatcher]

Actually, could someone, anyone post why North played so well?
Also, has our long injury list come to roost?

WHUFC, come on mate. Ease up.

[The Sleeping Giant]

Didn't hear it. Didn't see it. From stats and scores North did a hell of a lot better than anyone expected.

Your post shows you don't need brains to be a mod. 2 of those posts you quoted are after my post you quoted. Also hardly think Brucetiki's quote is giving any credit to North, seeing as though the season is not even half over.

[sjt]

Didn't hear it. Didn't see it. From stats and scores North did a hell of a lot better than anyone expected.

Your post shows you don't need brains to be a mod. 2 of those posts you quoted are after my post you quoted. Also hardly think Brucetiki's quote is giving any credit to North, seeing as though the season is not even half over.

Mate, I think you should edit your post above, makes you look a bit foolish. Mine and Brucetiki posts were on the first page. Cennals post was about 13 before yours and Hazy's about 7 before. Not sure which of the two were supposedly posted after yours???
Maybe you should have a quick look back before asserting Dogwatcher has no brains.

[The Sleeping Giant]

Right you are sjt. No need to edit though. My thoughts remain the same.

Let's all hope Centrals win well this week. Look how some go on when you nearly loose.

[sjt]

Right you are sjt. No need to edit though. My thoughts remain the same.

Let's all hope Centrals win well this week. Look how some go on when you nearly loose.

And if North lose, that they get a few more than four complimentary posts by the opposition supporters.

[The Sleeping Giant]

We are playing the Eagles this week.

[on the rails]

I didn't see the game so to hard to comment on whether North were really good or Centrals poor for the middle two quarters so I have refrained from comment. I will say plenty of good comments from Dogs supporters re North's effort however I did comment on WHUFC's ridiculous post last night which even the most "parochial" Dogs fans would agree was rubbish. Funny enough he hasn't even had the balls to retract it - I wonder why?

[whufc]

I didn't see the game so to hard to comment on whether North were really good or Centrals poor for the middle two quarters so I have refrained from comment. I will say plenty of good comments from Dogs supporters re North's effort however I did comment on WHUFC's ridiculous post last night which even the most "parochial" Dogs fans would agree was rubbish. Funny enough he hasn't even had the balls to retract it - I wonder why?

I retract it!

Happy Sir,