Is Roo serious?

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Jim05 » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:26 pm

redden whites wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:The GF will never be played anywhere else but Victoria.
The Brownlow has never been held anywhere else but Victoria.
The Brownlow is just another tired VFL hangover.
The tribunal is only ever held in Victoria, thus non Vic based players have to fly in order to put fwd a valid not guilty case before the tribunal, not helpful if their team is travelling for the next round or has just travelled.
I hate to say it, I can never give credence to a comp when a club like Power are not able to take their history into the AFL when Victorian clubs can.

Hang on, didn't the two S.A. sides join THEIR competition?? The world didn't start the day the Crows were formed :roll:

Correct.
The vic teams didnt come over here and join the SANFL. The two adelaide clubs joined an expanded VFL, surely they knew what they were getting into. The GF should never be anywhere but MCG but have no problem with brownlow being put on rotation
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48400
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1131 times
Been liked: 3849 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby tigerpie » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:30 pm

crowds are up for two reasons i believe.

1. ITS PROPER FOOTY!!!!!!

2. BETTER VALUE!!!!!

The AFL can go #&*@emselves. Leave our comp the @!&* alone and fix your own!!!!!
tigerpie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5082
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Has liked: 636 times
Been liked: 524 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby HOORAY PUNT » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:46 pm

Jim05 wrote:
redden whites wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:The GF will never be played anywhere else but Victoria.
The Brownlow has never been held anywhere else but Victoria.
The Brownlow is just another tired VFL hangover.
The tribunal is only ever held in Victoria, thus non Vic based players have to fly in order to put fwd a valid not guilty case before the tribunal, not helpful if their team is travelling for the next round or has just travelled.
I hate to say it, I can never give credence to a comp when a club like Power are not able to take their history into the AFL when Victorian clubs can.

Hang on, didn't the two S.A. sides join THEIR competition?? The world didn't start the day the Crows were formed :roll:

Correct.
The vic teams didnt come over here and join the SANFL. The two adelaide clubs joined an expanded VFL, surely they knew what they were getting into. The GF should never be anywhere but MCG but have no problem with brownlow being put on rotation


I understand the GF arguement ,that is simple business sense.

SA did join the competition which was called THE AFL - AUSTRALIAN football league . West Coast joined the VFL think. If you want to promote it as an Australian comp then do so but you must also ensure it is an Australian comp and at times compromise $ for the equality of the competition.
HOORAY PUNT
 

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby goraw » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:53 pm

redden whites wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:The GF will never be played anywhere else but Victoria.
The Brownlow has never been held anywhere else but Victoria.
The Brownlow is just another tired VFL hangover.
The tribunal is only ever held in Victoria, thus non Vic based players have to fly in order to put fwd a valid not guilty case before the tribunal, not helpful if their team is travelling for the next round or has just travelled.
I hate to say it, I can never give credence to a comp when a club like Power are not able to take their history into the AFL when Victorian clubs can.

Hang on, didn't the two S.A. sides join THEIR competition?? The world didn't start the day the Crows were formed :roll:



but the AFL did. thus meaning its an australian football league, not a victorian league.but i do think it is very victorian bias, so i will not attend .dont get mewrong im passionate about the AFC, but the whole feel about the competition doesnt satisfy me enough to go.when the crows were formed i went every week but havent been for years. as an interested observer because my love for the game, i do watch most of the footy shows. and the victorian bias is putrid.id much much rather the SANFL.
goraw
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:16 am
Location: prospect
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby redden whites » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:56 pm

It was and still is the AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL league not the AUSTRALIAN football league.
User avatar
redden whites
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:09 am
Location: On the way to Bonnie Doon
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby redden whites » Wed Apr 20, 2011 9:05 pm

goraw wrote:
redden whites wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:The GF will never be played anywhere else but Victoria.
The Brownlow has never been held anywhere else but Victoria.
The Brownlow is just another tired VFL hangover.
The tribunal is only ever held in Victoria, thus non Vic based players have to fly in order to put fwd a valid not guilty case before the tribunal, not helpful if their team is travelling for the next round or has just travelled.
I hate to say it, I can never give credence to a comp when a club like Power are not able to take their history into the AFL when Victorian clubs can.

Hang on, didn't the two S.A. sides join THEIR competition?? The world didn't start the day the Crows were formed :roll:



but the AFL did.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
redden whites
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:09 am
Location: On the way to Bonnie Doon
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby goraw » Wed Apr 20, 2011 9:17 pm

redden whites wrote:It was and still is the AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL league not the AUSTRALIAN football league.


no it was the VFL, VICTORIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE, which i had no interest in at all.because i had SANFL. although i was partial to hawthorn when the best player to ever enter a footy field,D.JARMAN played for them. ;)
goraw
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:16 am
Location: prospect
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby LPH » Wed Apr 20, 2011 9:59 pm

Actually, the AFL formed in 1990.

I think you will find that the 1990 premiership cup had the AFL on it, as did the flag.
The Crows didn't play until '91.

Perhaps I am 'splitting hairs' but my understanding was that on GF Day 1990, the 'injuction' wasn't even being invoked, that came a few weeks later. Am I right?

I am certain that the presentation of the cup to Collingwood mentioned the AFL name though.
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:45 am
Location: Craven Cottage
Has liked: 541 times
Been liked: 326 times
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:20 pm

Twas 1990. Collingwood won the first AFL premiership.
I have a few thoughts on this debate and will put together something discussing this in coming weeks that I'm sure will prompt some comments here.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Mic » Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:23 pm

'AFL' is just a name.
User avatar
Mic
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:17 pm
Has liked: 171 times
Been liked: 156 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby whufc » Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:24 pm

Mic wrote:'AFL' is just a name.


exactly just like how the Major League Baseball's finals series is called 'the world series'
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28772
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2852 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby goraw » Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:34 pm

Mic wrote:'AFL' is just a name.



exactly!! still run and controlled in every way, by victorians.
goraw
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:16 am
Location: prospect
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby CUTTERMAN » Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:47 pm

Naming, who joined who, if's, buts and maybes. None were my point but many are valid. My point was that SA punters are starting to feel disenfranchised as a part of the AFL, in my opinion this is largely due to the Victorian centric direction the comp has taken a turn towards in the last 5 or so years. I think people are sick of being fed the same old chicken feed via the same old routine.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby goraw » Wed Apr 20, 2011 11:02 pm

CUTTERMAN wrote:Naming, who joined who, if's, buts and maybes. None were my point but many are valid. My point was that SA punters are starting to feel disenfranchised as a part of the AFL, in my opinion this is largely due to the Victorian centric direction the comp has taken a turn towards in the last 5 or so years. I think people are sick of being fed the same old chicken feed via the same old routine.


pretty much.
goraw
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:16 am
Location: prospect
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Barto » Wed Apr 20, 2011 11:21 pm

redden whites wrote:It was and still is the AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL league not the AUSTRALIAN football league.


Clever way of putting it.

Reading some of the anti-SANFL comments on that article is the footy equivalent of living in Vichy France, they may as well be Victorians themselves the way they want to destroy the local comp. Hooray Punt pointed it out well about the solid foundation aspect of the game.

Today I went and did some work at the U16's carnival. All the lads that played come from far and wide in the WAFL zones and the local clubs put in a lot of hard work developing these young blokes. The post game speech emphasised what we're all doing there and that's to not only develop players for the local league clubs, but to ensure that as many of those kids that are capable of playing at the top level get the best grounding. Anyone who thinks that destroying that framework will benefit the top tier has rocks in their heads.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby redandblack » Wed Apr 20, 2011 11:34 pm

The article is just a lightweight piece of ill-thought out nonsense which just harms any respect Roo gained on the football field.
redandblack
 

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Dutchy » Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:01 am

whufc wrote:
Mic wrote:'AFL' is just a name.


exactly just like how the Major League Baseball's finals series is called 'the world series'


Which relates to a sponsor, nothing to do with the the planet we live on
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46272
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2650 times
Been liked: 4322 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Jim05 » Thu Apr 21, 2011 6:19 am

Dutchy wrote:
whufc wrote:
Mic wrote:'AFL' is just a name.


exactly just like how the Major League Baseball's finals series is called 'the world series'


Which relates to a sponsor, nothing to do with the the planet we live on

Yes the WORLD newspaper sponsored the first baseball championship and the name has stuck
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48400
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1131 times
Been liked: 3849 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby holden78 » Thu Apr 21, 2011 2:57 pm

Look hes not too bright , I think most of us realise that , so lets ignore him as he thinks having two SANFL memberships entitles him to have a credible opinion on how each club is good enough to be able to squeeze a small profit from a very difficult business / sporting enviroment ! What about the SANFL giving the PAPs a few million last year .... he conveniently ignores that little fact ! Hes had too many late nights kissing bull bars on country roads :roll:
redandblack wrote:The article is just a lightweight piece of ill-thought out nonsense which just harms any respect Roo gained on the football field.
holden78
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1945
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:43 am
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 55 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Apachebulldog » Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:15 pm

SANFL = REAL FOOTBALL and not the fast running ,pretty, over sanitised, money grabbing, TV version, yearly rule changing AFL crap. The SANFL crowds are up because some people have finally realised this new AFL TOUCH BALL is not the original game of AUSSIE RULES, it has morphed into an insipid, obscene, voracious money hungry enterprise for the gullible at the present can afford to attend however in time down the distant the future it will only be attended by the rich.

So these ex so called AFL footballers really have no idea, i guess they have to be loyal to the AFL as they have been paid millions in the past.

Shame on ya all.

Long live the SANFL the best footy in the land.
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: On the prairie
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 115 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |