Round 3 - Norwood v Glenelg @ Norwood - 7.40pm Fri 15/4/11

[am Bays]

W@nkers.

That raises a really interesting point. As Port are now one club, would this supposedly justify any movement of Power players between AFL and SANFL ranks that favoured the Magpies' cause?

Well given the Power dropped Hitchy to us to play Port Adelaide last week and took Banner as the travelling emergency I'd say no.

However Pseudo's description remains valid.....

[85 WAS A GOOD YEAR]

Local Footy SA Glenelg Team has too many forward lines.

Maybe it was a really long selection meeting on Wed night at The Bay, and they couldn't make up their minds which one to name.

Ty Allen's return is a big one. Welcome back Ty

McGinty's inclusion to cover Kirk's injury and give Trev Ruck support is a given.

Personally I'm really looking forward to Nick Cane and Chris Curran's debut. Have both been very solid players for past 13 mths in Reserves.

Good Luck to Shanon Snook who returns to League after a couple of games last season - Love the Snooky's

[Dirko]

come on guys, it's 1 player, you are sounding like your season relies upon AFL players to get you through, you will be fine.

It's the principal of the matter.

Why would Port need to "rest" a bloke 3 games in.

Then they have to play him next week (AFL) as the Bays have the bye. Surely they wouldn't want him running around for the reserves for the bottom side....

Then they'd be condescending pricks if they did that as they'd blow the theory as to why they're not letting him play tonight...

[JK]

Surely Kane must have an injury niggle of some description that the Power want rested.

[Dirko]

Surely Kane must have an injury niggle of some description that the Power want rested.

If so wouldn't they just declare it? Even if they made up some bullshit injury.

[CENTURION]

come on guys, it's 1 player, you are sounding like your season relies upon AFL players to get you through, you will be fine.

It's the principal of the matter.

Why would Port need to "rest" a bloke 3 games in.

Then they have to play him next week (AFL) as the Bays have the bye. Surely they wouldn't want him running around for the reserves for the bottom side....

Then they'd be condescending pricks if they did that as they'd blow the theory as to why they're not letting him play tonight...

yeah, good point.

[The Sleeping Giant]

You guys are making too much out of this. No need to hit the panic button just yet. Give it a few more weeks.

[CENTURION]

You guys are making too much out of this. No need to hit the panic button just yet. Give it a few more weeks.

still a good point though, it smacks of conspiracy theory to me!

[The Sleeping Giant]

Stop stoking the fire Centurion.

[CENTURION]

Stop stoking the fire Centurion.

who, ME? Nah......

[JK]

Surely Kane must have an injury niggle of some description that the Power want rested.

If so wouldn't they just declare it? Even if they made up some bullshit injury.

Not always, might be the Jared Crouch approach?

[Booney]

Peter Rhode said on AA that whilst Kane may have wanted to play for the Tigers, in the end the Power decided the rest was best and that it wouldn't have been fair to the Bays players, some of whom wouldn't have met Kane, seeing as though he hadn't trained with them at all.

With the PAP smears now having a vested interest in the performance of one particular SANFL team - and thus in the relative performance of all SANFL teams as a whole - it would be fairer to the Bays players and indeed the rest of the SANFL if they kept their moral stance to themselves.

W@nkers.

Just missing something here, you that is, he is first and foremost a Port Adelaide player, yes?

W@nkers.

That raises a really interesting point. As Port are now one club, would this supposedly justify any movement of Power players between AFL and SANFL ranks that favoured the Magpies' cause?

Well given the Power dropped Hitchy to us to play Port Adelaide last week and took Banner as the travelling emergency I'd say no.However Pseudo's description remains valid.....

[Barto]

Surely Kane must have an injury niggle of some description that the Power want rested.

If so wouldn't they just declare it? Even if they made up some bullshit injury.

Exactly. Why didn't Port just say that Kane Cornes was injured? If he's not playing for the Bays, then he technically hasn't been dropped.

Even just a "general soreness" as they like to say in exchange for rested.

[Go Legs]

You guys are making too much out of this. No need to hit the panic button just yet. Give it a few more weeks.

still a good point though, it smacks of conspiracy theory to me!

Glad you said that, now I won't have to cop a flack full from HBT who suspects I always think there is a conspiracy going on

Cheers,

[Dutchy]

Glenelg fans arent whinging cause we think Kane will help us tonight, moreso that there is an opportunity for us to see Kane put on the black and gold again where he grew up as a kid and learnt the game.

[pels]

Hopefully we get a great crowd and a cracking game and a legs victory, will make the pales taste a lot better.

[The Sleeping Giant]

Like that will matter, ya drunk.

[hottie]

Very strange read that Kane was told to go back to Glenelg,get as many posessions as possible.Tonight Graham said on radio,Kane has been told to rest this weekend and had a hard training session on Friday morning.

[CENTURION]

WILL WE EVER KNOW THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE, SORDID TRUTH??

[The Sleeping Giant]

Have heard Kevin Costner has bought the movie rights to the conspiracy. We will know the truth soon enough. The Cornes family will be entirely CGI. Like Gollum in LOTR.