by dedja » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:46 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:58 am
NO-MERCY wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Bull crap. The standard of football was below average. The only reason people are saying great game was because it was close.
Considering the conditions TSG i think your being very hard, yes there were alot of turnovers but i bet every other game in those conditions would of been as bad if not worse.
I take the conditions into consideration & as frustrating as is was at times i thought it was a great game to watch.
by dedja » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:07 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:08 am
by HOORAY PUNT » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:15 am
dedja wrote:can't argue they didn't deserved it ... I think people forget how many close games the Magpies lost last year.
by dedja » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:21 am
by HOORAY PUNT » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:31 am
by dedja » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:35 am
by pipers » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:55 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Hitting the opposition on the chest, handballs at the feet and just general fumbling of the ball. Yes it was windy, but it's not an excuse.
Not sure why people get so defensive when there team is involved in an ugly game of football.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:56 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:58 am
pipers wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Hitting the opposition on the chest, handballs at the feet and just general fumbling of the ball. Yes it was windy, but it's not an excuse.
Not sure why people get so defensive when there team is involved in an ugly game of football.
Well go and watch AFL then...
by smac » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:24 am
dedja wrote:It didn't look good standing behind Soders either ...
by johntheclaret » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:42 am
dedja wrote:can't argue they didn't deserved it ... I think people forget how many close games the Magpies lost last year.
by cje » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:59 am
by Lynwood » Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:56 am
by FlyingHigh » Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:03 pm
by bayman » Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:44 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Bull crap. The standard of football was below average. The only reason people are saying great game was because it was close.
Considering the conditions TSG i think your being very hard, yes there were alot of turnovers but i bet every other game in those conditions would of been as bad if not worse.
I take the conditions into consideration & as frustrating as is was at times i thought it was a great game to watch.
Maybe being harsh NM, but it didn't look good on TV.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:39 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Here's a pearler from the country edition of the Sunday Mail
"They (Port) put enormous pressure on Glenelg as they did in last year's finals series."
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Which is probably just as well because the match write-up is 15 pages in from the back.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:48 pm
bayman wrote:
obviously no breeze on the tv
ps, i thought north were worse than both port & glenelg as far as skill level was concerned in the 2 games i watched yesterday (without a tv)
by CK » Sun Apr 10, 2011 7:23 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |