Andy Collins

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Andy Collins

Postby lachlan » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:30 pm

I don' think you can blamne the coach.
The factas are Westies haven't got the cattle

we need

1. 2 Ruckman

2. a Couple of Forwards

3. 2 class midfielders
lachlan
Member
 
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: Andy Collins

Postby on the rails » Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:03 pm

lachlan wrote:I don' think you can blamne the coach.
The factas are Westies haven't got the cattle

we need

1. 2 Ruckman

2. a Couple of Forwards

3. 2 class midfielders


Too simplistic - the West game plan is not exactly set up for attack and high scoring is it based on the majority of the year?

North had 3 ruckman of league standard, enough forwards early on to create a real selection headache and some very good midfielders and look what happened to us with our horrible game plan.
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: Andy Collins

Postby nickname » Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm

whufc wrote:
personally i cant see how west can get ahead of any of the five sides above them in 2011


What if, say, we improved?
nickname
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Andy Collins

Postby Booney » Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:39 pm

Looks like Collins has had the time to implement his game style only to find the top of the table clubs play the exact opposite to what he likes to play.

Even the Magpies like to play open attacking football. Sure, we dont have the cattle but I think we have the right formula to succeed.

IMO, Westies at best were treading water in 2010.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61743
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8218 times
Been liked: 11948 times

Re: Andy Collins

Postby Ronnie » Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:13 pm

Booney wrote:Looks like Collins has had the time to implement his game style only to find the top of the table clubs play the exact opposite to what he likes to play.

Even the Magpies like to play open attacking football. Sure, we dont have the cattle but I think we have the right formula to succeed.
IMO, Westies at best were treading water in 2010.


Which is why Bamford had an impressive debut season as coach with only a bunch of kids at his disposal, while Collins is buying himself time with these mind numbing tactics
Ronnie
Reserves
 
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: Andy Collins

Postby topsywaldron » Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:32 pm

Ronnie wrote:while Collins is buying himself time with these mind numbing tactics


Given he's signed a new two year contract I'd say that worked then.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Andy Collins

Postby redandblack » Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:03 pm

I note that Glenelg, kicking with a gale, had all 18 men in defence at some stage against Central, according to the write-up.

All, repeat all, teams get numbers around the contest. The teams that score are the teams with damaging runners, better skills and effective forwards.
redandblack
 

Re: Andy Collins

Postby ca » Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:12 pm

lachlan wrote:I don' think you can blamne the coach.
The factas are Westies haven't got the cattle

we need

1. 2 Ruckman

2. a Couple of Forwards

3. 2 class midfielders


Along with just about every other club. I think West have a reasnoble list, good enough to play finals with the right coach.
User avatar
ca
Reserves
 
Posts: 874
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:00 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Andy Collins

Postby redandblack » Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:13 pm

We've got the right coach and the list is reasonable, but having the list on the park a bit more often would have helped.

Losing Ronaldson left our ruck stocks thin and meant Willits couldn't play forward. That might be a blessing, as he's stepped up a level. Losing Ferguson for half the season was a huge negative, Hartlett only played a few games, Anderson only played a few games and although Schmidt is a Crows player, he went from a rookie at the start of the year to playing mostly at AFL level.

Despite that and others, we won 10 games which is often enough to make the finals. We weren't good enough against the top teams, but the base has improved greatly, with our Reserves in the finals and the Under 18's second on percentage.

It's easy to just pan the supposed game plan, but a bit of good recruiting might make a significant difference to a team improving each year.
redandblack
 

Re: Andy Collins

Postby MagareyLegend » Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:18 pm

Sorry, I don't think you have got the right coach.
"Cousins, runs away from Carr ... not the first time we've seen that this season." - Dennis Commetti
MagareyLegend
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:12 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Andy Collins

Postby blood bath » Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:43 pm

MagareyLegend wrote:Sorry, I don't think you have got the right coach.


Im starting to think that too. Collins maybe in the Neil Craig catergory of looking good on paper with the personal playing achievements and professional employment + study, yet is stubborn and question marks over his game day coaching and reading of the game.

Take yesterday for instance.

Firstly, he didnt make any changes until 1/2 time, when it was too late. We needed to attack as it was a must win, however we continue to flood back, with not one player in our attacking half for much of the first half.

With heavy rain in the 2nd Q we had Bennett, Hartlett and Lobbe in the forward 50, yet no rover in sight (F Caruso and Rowe, both proven goal kickers in such conditions on the bench at this stage)

He allowed Nwd to have extra numbers in defence all day, with McGuiness running the ball out at will as there was no contest due to a lack of numbers.

People are questioning the cattle, I dont think Norwood's line up is any better than ours. Just they play a better style of footy, giving themselves a chance to win every contest, something i wish we did
blood bath
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:32 pm
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 26 times

Re: Andy Collins

Postby hottie » Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:53 pm

Totally agree,seen West play,the first game against North was fantastic attacking footy,other games was so defensive it was just a no confidence plan.When the ball would arrive in the forward line,their would be one West player against two or three defenders,near enough possible to score or even to keep the ball down it would be easy to rebound.Roy Laird and Nathan Bassett both said during the season it was a good test for their own teams to play against West and have to learn to play a different game,where patience was needed and work the way through the defensive tactics.
hottie
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:18 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Callington

Re: Andy Collins

Postby Blacky » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:02 pm

MagareyLegend wrote:Sorry, I don't think you have got the right coach.

dont think you got the right one either :roll:
Current image:
Maximum dimensions; width: 100 pixels, height: 100 pixels, file size: 20.51 KiB
The avatar functionality is currently DISABLED.
Blacky
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1027
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Front bar at WESTIES
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 50 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Re: Andy Collins

Postby southee » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:03 pm

lachlan wrote:I don' think you can blamne the coach.
The factas are Westies haven't got the cattle

we need

1. 2 Ruckman

2. a Couple of Forwards

3. 2 class midfielders


Dont we all..... :?
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 870 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Andy Collins

Postby redandblack » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:14 pm

hottie wrote:Totally agree,seen West play,the first game against North was fantastic attacking footy,other games was so defensive it was just a no confidence plan.When the ball would arrive in the forward line,their would be one West player against two or three defenders,near enough possible to score or even to keep the ball down it would be easy to rebound.Roy Laird and Nathan Bassett both said during the season it was a good test for their own teams to play against West and have to learn to play a different game,where patience was needed and work the way through the defensive tactics.

"
So you're saying Collins had an attacking game plan in Round 1, won convincingly and then said "we'd better play a defensive style from now on :roll: "

Norwood play a very defensive style, but they're better at it.
redandblack
 

Re: Andy Collins

Postby whufc » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:38 pm

redandblack wrote:
hottie wrote:Totally agree,seen West play,the first game against North was fantastic attacking footy,other games was so defensive it was just a no confidence plan.When the ball would arrive in the forward line,their would be one West player against two or three defenders,near enough possible to score or even to keep the ball down it would be easy to rebound.Roy Laird and Nathan Bassett both said during the season it was a good test for their own teams to play against West and have to learn to play a different game,where patience was needed and work the way through the defensive tactics.

"
So you're saying Collins had an attacking game plan in Round 1, won convincingly and then said "we'd better play a defensive style from now on :roll: "

Norwood play a very defensive style, but they're better at it.


i personally think collins doesnt have enough confidence in his players.

whenever they play teams above them especially central they were putting men behind the ball from the opening bounce.

to say westies didnt put more men behind the ball or play a very defensive style of football is blind loyalty. the only team that played more defensive was north adelaide.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28771
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2849 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Andy Collins

Postby on the rails » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:50 pm

Wrong whufc - when we beat West in our second encounter they flooded worse than us and as a result we won easily and we flooded that day. It only took us or should I say Healy after getting some choice words from a few senior players at halftime of the round 20 game against South to throw out some of the defensive rubbish and half attack!
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: Andy Collins

Postby lachlan » Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:00 pm

West has the right coach for sure. Its very simple to blame the coach

Our Midfield against Norwood was, Ezard, N. Caruso. Rowe, Davies, Piasente & Hill

Norwood's midfield was, Gallagher, Lower, Trotter, Weatherald, Zorzi & Phillips.


No disrespect to the Westies boys they are all hard working players but I know which midfield I would like
lachlan
Member
 
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: Andy Collins

Postby redandblack » Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:20 pm

on the rails wrote:Wrong whufc - when we beat West in our second encounter they flooded worse than us and as a result we won easily and we flooded that day. It only took us or should I say Healy after getting some choice words from a few senior players at halftime of the round 20 game against South to throw out some of the defensive rubbish and half attack!


Thanks for that, otr. I spent years listening to your lectures about my club being unprofessional and having no support. I've watched your club and have decided there's not much there to learn from, so I no longer take much notice of your predictable outpourings any more on the subject of West Adelaide, except to enjoy the venom :D

I'll now retreat to my bomb shelter to survive your next onslaught ;)
redandblack
 

Re: Andy Collins

Postby Bunton » Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:06 am

struggling to cop the "poor Collo - the only reason he is not a premiership coach, is because he has a crap list" train of thinking. The Club has bought in more recruits than you could poke a stick at over the three years that he has been there. Some great, many ordinary like Birss, Krakour, Langford, etc, and some that came and went very quickly, but the point is Andy picked them all, and also moved on many players there were there when he arrived. If the list is crap, then that it his fault - no club in the SANFL has provided more autonomy and transfer-fee cash in recent times than Westies have for Collins.

He needs to live and die by his results - after three years, the excuses are no longer relevant.
Bunton
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:41 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |