by maccad » Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:13 am
by Dutchy » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:42 am
by on the rails » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:00 pm
Squawk wrote:whufc wrote:no beat a very much under strength side on there home deck which is not comparable to any ground the finals will be played at.
Norwood were also missing Bown, Trotter, Young, Doyle and Gorringe.
Walker a wild card to play 2 more games and qualify for finals.
2 sides, 21 players each. Rare to see two sides both at full strength play one another, so at the end of the day 2pts is 2pts.
by Rik E Boy » Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:18 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Whats a "real deal"?
Premiership contender? No way.
Making up the numbers? You bet.
by Rik E Boy » Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:21 pm
whufc wrote:no beat a very much under strength side on there home deck which is not comparable to any ground the finals will be played at.
If they get a run like that with the umpires ever again ill become a port supporter.
If thats the closest competition to the Dogs we are home and hosed for premiership number 9
by doggies4eva » Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:28 pm
by SDK » Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:44 pm
by GWW » Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:06 pm
by bayman » Wed Jun 09, 2010 9:02 pm
G wrote:bayman are you a slow learner ???????
I told you over a month ago that they were and Im surprised that such a learned local footy follower as yourself, has taken this long to get up to scratch with the program![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |